The economics of soft power: Reliance on economic resources and instrumentality in economic gains

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Economic and Political Studies-EPS Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1080/20954816.2020.1865620
Daniele Carminati
{"title":"The economics of soft power: Reliance on economic resources and instrumentality in economic gains","authors":"Daniele Carminati","doi":"10.1080/20954816.2020.1865620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Soft power is commonly presented as an alternative or a complement to harder forms of power, such as military and economic might. However, while it is safer to say that soft power does not depend on military capabilities, it is not as straightforward to separate soft power from its economic counterpart. Juxtaposing various soft power rankings with a country’s economic assets may reveal how soft power relies on economic resources. Moreover, when closely scrutinised, it is possible to appreciate how dynamics of attraction are also closely intertwined with economic gains. In an increasingly connected world, soft power could prove to be instrumental in achieving economic success. Economic effects are expected to be more consistent, observable, and attainable when compared to political ones, such as spreading democracy. Far from arguing that soft power is unable to assist in achieving political goals in the long term, this paper aims instead to highlight how a narrow culture-centred analysis of soft power greatly limits the understanding of this power in the real world, and results in the underestimation of its value and impact. China’s quest to connect the world through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a topical case through which to further explore the soft–economic power nexus.","PeriodicalId":44280,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Political Studies-EPS","volume":"10 1","pages":"19 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20954816.2020.1865620","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Political Studies-EPS","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2020.1865620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Soft power is commonly presented as an alternative or a complement to harder forms of power, such as military and economic might. However, while it is safer to say that soft power does not depend on military capabilities, it is not as straightforward to separate soft power from its economic counterpart. Juxtaposing various soft power rankings with a country’s economic assets may reveal how soft power relies on economic resources. Moreover, when closely scrutinised, it is possible to appreciate how dynamics of attraction are also closely intertwined with economic gains. In an increasingly connected world, soft power could prove to be instrumental in achieving economic success. Economic effects are expected to be more consistent, observable, and attainable when compared to political ones, such as spreading democracy. Far from arguing that soft power is unable to assist in achieving political goals in the long term, this paper aims instead to highlight how a narrow culture-centred analysis of soft power greatly limits the understanding of this power in the real world, and results in the underestimation of its value and impact. China’s quest to connect the world through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a topical case through which to further explore the soft–economic power nexus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软实力经济学:经济收益对经济资源和工具的依赖
摘要软实力通常被认为是对军事和经济实力等硬实力的替代或补充。然而,虽然说软实力不取决于军事能力更安全,但将软实力与经济实力区分开来并不是那么简单。将各种软实力排名与一个国家的经济资产并列,可以揭示软实力对经济资源的依赖程度。此外,当仔细观察时,可以发现吸引力的动态与经济收益是如何紧密交织在一起的。在一个日益互联的世界里,软实力可能对实现经济成功起到重要作用。与传播民主等政治影响相比,经济影响预计将更加一致、可观察和可实现。本文并没有认为软实力无法长期帮助实现政治目标,而是旨在强调对软实力的狭隘文化中心分析如何极大地限制了对现实世界中这种力量的理解,并导致低估其价值和影响。中国寻求通过其“一带一路”倡议倡议(BRI)连接世界,这是进一步探索软实力与经济实力关系的一个热门案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Political Studies-EPS
Economic and Political Studies-EPS SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Understanding the digital economy in China: Characteristics, challenges, and prospects The affordability of access to health care for older adults in China Youth voting and institutional change in the post-Arab Spring MENA region No more free lunch: The increasing popularity of machine learning and financial market efficiency The value of FinTech innovations for the finance industry: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1