On MNC-host government relations: How Finnish firms respond to national and regional policies in ASEAN

Q3 Social Sciences Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies Pub Date : 2017-03-22 DOI:10.22439/CJAS.V34I2.5306
E. Kettunen
{"title":"On MNC-host government relations: How Finnish firms respond to national and regional policies in ASEAN","authors":"E. Kettunen","doi":"10.22439/CJAS.V34I2.5306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combining literature from international political economy, international business, and institutional approaches to business studies, this article discusses foreign firms' relationship with the public sector in Southeast Asia. It focuses on the perceptions of the firms on host country policies toward foreign direct investments (FDI) and the impact of global financial crises and regional economic integration on the firms' strategies. The multinational company (MNC)-host government relationship is seen as a cooperative and continual bargaining within a specific institutional framework. Based on interviews with managers of subsidiaries originating from Finland, it is found that the regulatory environment of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries varies from easy to difficult with regard to policies, bureaucracy and protectionism. These pose institutional constraints for the firms, with additional economic constraints caused by global financial crises. Contrary to expectations, the ASEAN free trade agreement does not figure in the firms' investment strategies. This is explained by three findings: most of the firms serve the domestic host country market; the firms operate global rather than ASEAN-wide regional production chains; the firms represent industries that are not typical in Southeast Asian regional production networks.","PeriodicalId":35904,"journal":{"name":"Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/CJAS.V34I2.5306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Combining literature from international political economy, international business, and institutional approaches to business studies, this article discusses foreign firms' relationship with the public sector in Southeast Asia. It focuses on the perceptions of the firms on host country policies toward foreign direct investments (FDI) and the impact of global financial crises and regional economic integration on the firms' strategies. The multinational company (MNC)-host government relationship is seen as a cooperative and continual bargaining within a specific institutional framework. Based on interviews with managers of subsidiaries originating from Finland, it is found that the regulatory environment of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries varies from easy to difficult with regard to policies, bureaucracy and protectionism. These pose institutional constraints for the firms, with additional economic constraints caused by global financial crises. Contrary to expectations, the ASEAN free trade agreement does not figure in the firms' investment strategies. This is explained by three findings: most of the firms serve the domestic host country market; the firms operate global rather than ASEAN-wide regional production chains; the firms represent industries that are not typical in Southeast Asian regional production networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨国公司东道国政府关系:芬兰公司如何回应东盟国家和地区政策
本文结合国际政治经济学、国际商业和商业研究的制度方法的文献,讨论了东南亚外国公司与公共部门的关系。它侧重于企业对东道国外国直接投资政策的看法,以及全球金融危机和区域经济一体化对企业战略的影响。跨国公司与东道国政府的关系被视为在特定制度框架内的合作和持续谈判。根据对芬兰子公司经理的访谈,发现东南亚国家联盟(东盟)国家的监管环境在政策、官僚主义和保护主义方面有易有难。这些给企业带来了制度约束,全球金融危机也带来了额外的经济约束。与预期相反,东盟自由贸易协定没有出现在这些公司的投资战略中。这可以通过三个发现来解释:大多数公司服务于东道国国内市场;这些公司经营全球而非东盟范围的区域生产链;这些公司所代表的行业在东南亚地区生产网络中并不典型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies
Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Foreword Beyond Methodological Nationalism Pasts of the Present Fūdo in Foreign Language Learning in Japan and Finland Alessandro Rippa, Borderland Infrastructures: Trade, Development and Control in Western China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1