How Much Reform?

Lioubov Pogorelova
{"title":"How Much Reform?","authors":"Lioubov Pogorelova","doi":"10.52214/jmetc.v13i1.9017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though the curriculum reform movement that began in 1989 has had a significant impact on calculus pedagogy and content (Windham, 2008), the question remains to what extent reform-based calculus textbooks reflect these reforms. This paper explores this question by analyzing the mathematical content and pedagogical approach of the chapter on functions in Hughes-Hallett et al.’s (2018) reform-based college textbook Calculus: Single and Multivariable (CS&M). To conduct this analysis, the paper first synthesizes Hwang et al.’s (2021) framework for analyzing mathematics textbooks along with Sood and Jitendra’s (2007) framework for comparing traditional and reform-based mathematics textbooks. The paper then applies the synthesized frameworks to identify elements of reform from the big ideas, contextual features, mediated scaffolding, problem solving activities, and STEM integration found in the CS&M chapter. The results suggest that, although the chapter  integrates many reform-based principles, there may be scope for further integration. Such efforts, however, may be constrained by influential stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":30179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/jmetc.v13i1.9017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though the curriculum reform movement that began in 1989 has had a significant impact on calculus pedagogy and content (Windham, 2008), the question remains to what extent reform-based calculus textbooks reflect these reforms. This paper explores this question by analyzing the mathematical content and pedagogical approach of the chapter on functions in Hughes-Hallett et al.’s (2018) reform-based college textbook Calculus: Single and Multivariable (CS&M). To conduct this analysis, the paper first synthesizes Hwang et al.’s (2021) framework for analyzing mathematics textbooks along with Sood and Jitendra’s (2007) framework for comparing traditional and reform-based mathematics textbooks. The paper then applies the synthesized frameworks to identify elements of reform from the big ideas, contextual features, mediated scaffolding, problem solving activities, and STEM integration found in the CS&M chapter. The results suggest that, although the chapter  integrates many reform-based principles, there may be scope for further integration. Such efforts, however, may be constrained by influential stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多少改革?
尽管始于1989年的课程改革运动对微积分教学法和内容产生了重大影响(Windham,2008),但问题仍然是基于改革的微积分教科书在多大程度上反映了这些改革。本文通过分析Hughes-Hallett等人(2018)基于改革的大学教科书《微积分:单变量与多变量》(CS&M)中函数一章的数学内容和教学方法来探讨这个问题。为了进行这一分析,本文首先综合了Hwang等人(2021)的数学教科书分析框架,以及Sood和Jitendra(2007)的传统和改革数学教科书比较框架。然后,本文应用综合框架,从CS&M章节中的大思想、背景特征、中介脚手架、问题解决活动和STEM整合中确定改革要素。结果表明,尽管本章综合了许多基于改革的原则,但可能还有进一步综合的余地。然而,这种努力可能会受到有影响力的利益攸关方的制约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing Number Sense with Number Talks About the Authors and Reviewer Acknowledgement How Pre-Service Teachers Define “Good” Mathematics Teaching and Learning Briefly Recalling Moments in Mathematics Education History: The Gender factor and New Technologies in the Comprehension of Probabilities: Evidence from the Perceptions of Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1