Comparison of Environmental Costs in Divisions with Different Geographical Action and their Significance in Environmental Management

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Management Systems in Production Engineering Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.2478/mspe-2023-0027
K. Teplická, S. Hurná
{"title":"Comparison of Environmental Costs in Divisions with Different Geographical Action and their Significance in Environmental Management","authors":"K. Teplická, S. Hurná","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relevance of the decision of this scientific research is related to the requirements of Industry 4.0. orientated to environmental sustainability. This article summarizes the scientific discussion on the issue of the comparison of environmental costs in various divisions such as Slovakia, Italy, Brazil, Mexico, China. The main goal of this article is to compare costs in divisions of the parent company with different geographical working. The object of the research was the parent company EMBRACO. Methods of research were focused on using economic analysis with indicators of the cost function, chain index, and cost structure. The results of the research show environmental costs of the divisions are at the level of €1.9-€3.1 million. The total state of the environmental costs by individual country represents the lowest value in Italy and Slovakia. The lowest environmental costs are for the category of air costs for all divisions and the second category of costs with low values are other environmental costs, while Brazil and Mexico do not record this category of costs in the accounting. The key category for minimizing environmental costs is water costs for Slovakia and China and other waste costs for Italy, Brazil, and Mexico. The hazardous waste category represents (0.9-32%). Based on these results, the parent company can decide on the possibilities of positioning its divisions in terms of strategic business.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":"248 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The relevance of the decision of this scientific research is related to the requirements of Industry 4.0. orientated to environmental sustainability. This article summarizes the scientific discussion on the issue of the comparison of environmental costs in various divisions such as Slovakia, Italy, Brazil, Mexico, China. The main goal of this article is to compare costs in divisions of the parent company with different geographical working. The object of the research was the parent company EMBRACO. Methods of research were focused on using economic analysis with indicators of the cost function, chain index, and cost structure. The results of the research show environmental costs of the divisions are at the level of €1.9-€3.1 million. The total state of the environmental costs by individual country represents the lowest value in Italy and Slovakia. The lowest environmental costs are for the category of air costs for all divisions and the second category of costs with low values are other environmental costs, while Brazil and Mexico do not record this category of costs in the accounting. The key category for minimizing environmental costs is water costs for Slovakia and China and other waste costs for Italy, Brazil, and Mexico. The hazardous waste category represents (0.9-32%). Based on these results, the parent company can decide on the possibilities of positioning its divisions in terms of strategic business.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同地理作用区划的环境成本比较及其在环境管理中的意义
本次科研决策的相关性与工业4.0的要求有关。注重环境的可持续性。本文总结了斯洛伐克、意大利、巴西、墨西哥、中国等国家对环境成本比较问题的科学讨论。本文的主要目的是比较不同地域工作的母公司各部门的成本。研究对象是母公司恩布拉科。研究方法侧重于运用经济分析方法,以成本函数、链指数和成本结构为指标。研究结果显示,各部门的环境成本在190万欧元至310万欧元之间。各个国家的环境成本总额在意大利和斯洛伐克是最低的。最低的环境成本是所有部门的空气成本类别,价值较低的第二类成本是其他环境成本,而巴西和墨西哥在会计中没有记录这一类成本。使环境成本最小化的关键类别是斯洛伐克和中国的水成本以及意大利、巴西和墨西哥的其他废物成本。危险废物类别占(0.9% -32%)。根据这些结果,母公司可以决定在战略业务方面定位其部门的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mortar Method for 2D Elastic Bounded Contact Problems Developing Industry 5.0 To Effectively Harness Production Capacities A Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Research Publications on Lean Manufacturing: Identifying Key Themes and Trends Study of a Low-Cost Method for Estimating Energy Fuel Resources in Anthropogenic Sediments Application of Methods of Decentralized Systems in Management in Lean Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1