Comparison of External Fixation and Supplementary Kirschner-Wires Fixation With Volar Locking Plate for the Treatment of Intra- Articular Distal End Radius Fractures

R. Dwivedi, M. Khatri, Arjun Kc
{"title":"Comparison of External Fixation and Supplementary Kirschner-Wires Fixation With Volar Locking Plate for the Treatment of Intra- Articular Distal End Radius Fractures","authors":"R. Dwivedi, M. Khatri, Arjun Kc","doi":"10.22502/JLMC.V8I2.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are controversies regarding the benefit of open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plates over closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires fixation for intra-articular distal end radius fracture. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes between external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires with volar locking plate in the treatment of intra-articular distal end radius fractures. Methods: This prospective, observational and analytical study was conducted over one and a half years. Forty-seven adults with displaced intra-articular distal end radius fracture were included in the study. Twenty-one cases were treated with closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires, whereas 26 patients were treated with open reduction and volar locking plate fixation. Results: At the end of three months, as per the Green and O’Brien scoring, the mean functional outcome score in the volar plate group was significantly better 80.77(±11.46) than the external fixation group 70.24(±10.66) (p=0.002). However, at the end of six months, the mean score in the volar plate group 86.15(±7.39) was not significantly different from the external fixation group 81.43(±9.63) (p= 0.63). Fracture reduction was achieved and maintained better in the volar locking plate group. Conclusion: Functional outcome of closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires is comparable with open reduction and internal fixation by volar locking plate in treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. Radiological correction is achieved and maintained better with volar locking plates.","PeriodicalId":16109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22502/JLMC.V8I2.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are controversies regarding the benefit of open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plates over closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires fixation for intra-articular distal end radius fracture. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes between external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires with volar locking plate in the treatment of intra-articular distal end radius fractures. Methods: This prospective, observational and analytical study was conducted over one and a half years. Forty-seven adults with displaced intra-articular distal end radius fracture were included in the study. Twenty-one cases were treated with closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires, whereas 26 patients were treated with open reduction and volar locking plate fixation. Results: At the end of three months, as per the Green and O’Brien scoring, the mean functional outcome score in the volar plate group was significantly better 80.77(±11.46) than the external fixation group 70.24(±10.66) (p=0.002). However, at the end of six months, the mean score in the volar plate group 86.15(±7.39) was not significantly different from the external fixation group 81.43(±9.63) (p= 0.63). Fracture reduction was achieved and maintained better in the volar locking plate group. Conclusion: Functional outcome of closed reduction and external fixation along with supplementary Kirschner wires is comparable with open reduction and internal fixation by volar locking plate in treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. Radiological correction is achieved and maintained better with volar locking plates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volar锁定钢板外固定与Kirschner钢丝辅助固定治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的比较
导读:对于桡骨远端关节内骨折,开放复位和掌侧锁定钢板内固定优于闭合复位和外固定并辅助克氏针内固定存在争议。因此,本研究旨在比较外固定带克氏针辅助掌侧锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的效果。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性和分析性研究进行了一年半。47例成人桡骨远端关节内移位骨折纳入研究。21例采用闭合复位外固定联合克氏针,26例采用开放复位和掌侧锁定钢板固定。结果:三个月后,根据Green和O 'Brien评分,掌侧钢板组的平均功能结局评分为80.77(±11.46)分,显著优于外固定组70.24(±10.66)分(p=0.002)。6个月后,掌侧钢板组平均评分86.15(±7.39)分与外固定架组81.43(±9.63)分差异无统计学意义(p= 0.63)。掌侧锁定钢板组骨折复位和维持较好。结论:桡骨远端移位性关节内骨折采用克氏针辅助闭合复位外固定与掌侧锁定钢板切开复位内固定疗效相当。使用掌侧锁定钢板可以更好地实现和维持放射矫正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Variations of Renal Artery in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography of Abdomen: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study Knowledge, Practices and Anxiety related to Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID -19) among Nursing Students in Nepal Clinical Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude on Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study Pregnant Women’s Mental Health Status and its Related Factors Amidst COVID-19: A Cross- Sectional Study Morphological Variation of Circle of Willis in Nepali Population: A 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1