Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Technology Pedagogy and Education Pub Date : 2022-03-11 DOI:10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215
Zhonggen Yu, Liheng Yu, Qingkun Xu, Wei Xu, Ping Wu
{"title":"Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning","authors":"Zhonggen Yu, Liheng Yu, Qingkun Xu, Wei Xu, Ping Wu","doi":"10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mobile learning technologies and social media tools have not been studied to an exhaustive extent in terms of student engagement and learning outcomes. Using a quasi-experimental research method, the authors randomly selected 101 participants who were divided into three groups. Each group received English teaching assisted by mobile learning technology (Rain Classroom), a social media tool (WeChat) and the traditional multimedia projecting system for one semester. The authors concluded that mobile learning technologies could significantly improve behavioural, social, cognitive and emotional engagements and English learning outcomes compared with social media tools. The traditional teaching tools did not improve behavioural, social, cognitive and emotional engagements and learning outcomes as much as Rain Classroom and WeChat did. Future research could focus on development of serious games to improve student engagement and learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":46992,"journal":{"name":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mobile learning technologies and social media tools have not been studied to an exhaustive extent in terms of student engagement and learning outcomes. Using a quasi-experimental research method, the authors randomly selected 101 participants who were divided into three groups. Each group received English teaching assisted by mobile learning technology (Rain Classroom), a social media tool (WeChat) and the traditional multimedia projecting system for one semester. The authors concluded that mobile learning technologies could significantly improve behavioural, social, cognitive and emotional engagements and English learning outcomes compared with social media tools. The traditional teaching tools did not improve behavioural, social, cognitive and emotional engagements and learning outcomes as much as Rain Classroom and WeChat did. Future research could focus on development of serious games to improve student engagement and learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动学习技术和社交媒体工具对学生参与度和英语学习结果的影响
摘要移动学习技术和社交媒体工具尚未在学生参与度和学习成果方面得到详尽的研究。采用准实验研究方法,作者随机选择101名参与者,分为三组。每个小组都接受了一个学期的移动学习技术(Rain Classroom)、社交媒体工具(WeChat)和传统多媒体投影系统的英语教学。作者得出结论,与社交媒体工具相比,移动学习技术可以显著改善行为、社交、认知和情感参与以及英语学习结果。传统的教学工具并没有像Rain Classroom和微信那样改善行为、社交、认知和情感参与以及学习结果。未来的研究可能侧重于开发严肃的游戏,以提高学生的参与度和学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Technology Pedagogy and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Student teacher learning with Ozobots and Makey Makeys during a workshop and field experience Scripted synergy: elevating EFL writing and creativity through collaborative digital storytelling Unmasking the depoliticisation of ICT in digital competence frameworks for educators: a critical discourse study WhatsApp for pedagogy: initiatives, instructional practices and the nature of knowledge in Israel’s secondary education A testing load: a review of cognitive load in computer and paper-based learning and assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1