[Normal and Near Normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Data Analysis: Two-Year Major Adverse Cardiac Event].

Q3 Nursing Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).09
Li-Hua Tang, Yih-Hwen Huang, Chien-Jung Chen, R. Yen, Min-Hsuan Tsai, C. Chen
{"title":"[Normal and Near Normal Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Data Analysis: Two-Year Major Adverse Cardiac Event].","authors":"Li-Hua Tang, Yih-Hwen Huang, Chien-Jung Chen, R. Yen, Min-Hsuan Tsai, C. Chen","doi":"10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the method most commonly used to assess patients with suspected coronary artery disease for the presence of myocardial ischemia and risk of subsequent adverse cardiac events. Studies are limited on the incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with normal MPI results.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThe aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of MACE in patients with normal or near-normal MPI results.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this single-center retrospective chart review study, patients who had received MPI tests at a nuclear medicine department of a medical center in 2017 were consecutively enrolled. All of the participants in this study were patients with normal or near-normal MPI results, and were followed for two years to assess the incidence of MACE (death, hospitalized for percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, heart failure and stroke). Participants with or without MACE were compared to determine whether demographic, comorbidity, and MPI data were significant risk factors.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 1,629 participants (age = 70.4 ± 11.3 years, 49.4% male) enrolled, 387 (23.8%) were classified into the normal MPI group and 1,242 (76.2%) were classified into the near-normal MPI group. Notably, 61 participants (15.8%) in the normal MPI group and 206 (16.6%) in the near-normal MPI group experienced MACE events during the two-year follow-up. The risk factors of MACE identified in this study included being older in age, being male, and having poor myocardial perfusion parameters (i.e., ejection fraction) during MPI.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\nOver the two-year study period, 15.8% of the participants with normal MPI results and 16.6% of those with near-normal MPI results experienced major adverse cardiac events. Thus, it is critical to inform patients regarding the potential risk of MACE risk and to educate them on how to mitigate this risk by actively managing their hyperlipidemia level and left ventricular ejection fraction.","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"69 3 1","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the method most commonly used to assess patients with suspected coronary artery disease for the presence of myocardial ischemia and risk of subsequent adverse cardiac events. Studies are limited on the incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with normal MPI results. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of MACE in patients with normal or near-normal MPI results. METHODS In this single-center retrospective chart review study, patients who had received MPI tests at a nuclear medicine department of a medical center in 2017 were consecutively enrolled. All of the participants in this study were patients with normal or near-normal MPI results, and were followed for two years to assess the incidence of MACE (death, hospitalized for percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, heart failure and stroke). Participants with or without MACE were compared to determine whether demographic, comorbidity, and MPI data were significant risk factors. RESULTS Of the 1,629 participants (age = 70.4 ± 11.3 years, 49.4% male) enrolled, 387 (23.8%) were classified into the normal MPI group and 1,242 (76.2%) were classified into the near-normal MPI group. Notably, 61 participants (15.8%) in the normal MPI group and 206 (16.6%) in the near-normal MPI group experienced MACE events during the two-year follow-up. The risk factors of MACE identified in this study included being older in age, being male, and having poor myocardial perfusion parameters (i.e., ejection fraction) during MPI. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Over the two-year study period, 15.8% of the participants with normal MPI results and 16.6% of those with near-normal MPI results experienced major adverse cardiac events. Thus, it is critical to inform patients regarding the potential risk of MACE risk and to educate them on how to mitigate this risk by actively managing their hyperlipidemia level and left ventricular ejection fraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【正常和接近正常心肌灌注成像数据分析:两年主要心脏不良事件】。
背景心肌灌注成像(MPI)是最常用于评估疑似冠状动脉疾病患者是否存在心肌缺血和随后发生心脏不良事件的风险的方法。MPI结果正常的患者的主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率研究有限。目的本研究的目的是调查MPI结果正常或接近正常的患者中MACE的发生率和危险因素。方法在这项单中心回顾性图表回顾研究中,2017年在医疗中心核医学科接受MPI检测的患者被连续纳入。本研究的所有参与者均为MPI结果正常或接近正常的患者,并随访两年以评估MACE的发生率(死亡,因经皮冠状动脉介入治疗住院;冠状动脉搭桥术,心力衰竭和中风)。比较有或没有MACE的参与者,以确定人口统计学、共病和MPI数据是否是重要的风险因素。结果在入选的1629名参与者(年龄=70.4±11.3岁,49.4%为男性)中,387人(23.8%)被分为正常MPI组,1242人(76.2%)被划分为接近正常MPI组。值得注意的是,在两年的随访中,正常MPI组有61名参与者(15.8%)和接近正常MPI组的206名参与者(16.6%)经历了MACE事件。本研究中确定的MACE的危险因素包括年龄较大、男性以及MPI期间心肌灌注参数(即射血分数)较差。结论/实践意义在两年的研究期间,15.8%MPI结果正常的参与者和16.6%MPI结果接近正常的参与者经历了重大心脏不良事件。因此,重要的是告知患者MACE风险的潜在风险,并教育他们如何通过积极管理高脂血症水平和左心室射血分数来减轻这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
[A Guide to Network Meta-Analysis Using Generative AI and No-Code Tools]. [A Study on the Life Attitudes, Fear of Death, and Dying Care Abilities of Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Institutions]. [Analysis of the Effectiveness of a Fall Prevention Program Incorporating an Interprofessional Team Collaboration Model on Reducing Fall Risk in Elderly Living in Long-term Care Facilities]. [Application of Artificial Intelligence Models in Nursing Research]. [Caregiving Experience With a Young Father With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Renal Dialysis and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1