Assessing and Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of Predictive Analytics: An Empirically Tested Design Framework

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07421222.2022.2063549
Weifeng Li, Yidong Chai
{"title":"Assessing and Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of Predictive Analytics: An Empirically Tested Design Framework","authors":"Weifeng Li, Yidong Chai","doi":"10.1080/07421222.2022.2063549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As predictive analytics increasingly applies supervised machine learning (SML) models to inform mission-critical decision-making, adversaries become incentivized to exploit the vulnerabilities of these SML models and mislead predictive analytics into erroneous decisions. Due to the limited understanding and awareness of such adversarial attacks, the predictive analytics knowledge and deployment need a principled technique for adversarial robustness assessment and enhancement. In this research, we leverage the technology threat avoidance theory as the kernel theory and propose a research framework for assessing and enhancing the adversarial robustness of predictive analytics applications. We instantiate the proposed framework by developing a robust text classification system, the ARText system. The proposed system is rigorously evaluated in comparison with benchmark methods on two tasks extensively enabled by SML: spam review detection and spam email detection, which then confirmed the utility and effectiveness of our ARText system. Results from numerous experiments revealed that our proposed framework could significantly enhance the adversarial robustness of predictive analytics applications.","PeriodicalId":50154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":"542 - 572"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2063549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT As predictive analytics increasingly applies supervised machine learning (SML) models to inform mission-critical decision-making, adversaries become incentivized to exploit the vulnerabilities of these SML models and mislead predictive analytics into erroneous decisions. Due to the limited understanding and awareness of such adversarial attacks, the predictive analytics knowledge and deployment need a principled technique for adversarial robustness assessment and enhancement. In this research, we leverage the technology threat avoidance theory as the kernel theory and propose a research framework for assessing and enhancing the adversarial robustness of predictive analytics applications. We instantiate the proposed framework by developing a robust text classification system, the ARText system. The proposed system is rigorously evaluated in comparison with benchmark methods on two tasks extensively enabled by SML: spam review detection and spam email detection, which then confirmed the utility and effectiveness of our ARText system. Results from numerous experiments revealed that our proposed framework could significantly enhance the adversarial robustness of predictive analytics applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和增强预测分析的对抗稳健性:一个经验检验的设计框架
随着预测分析越来越多地应用监督机器学习(SML)模型来为关键任务决策提供信息,攻击者会受到激励,利用这些SML模型的漏洞,误导预测分析做出错误的决策。由于对这种对抗性攻击的理解和认识有限,预测分析知识和部署需要一种原则性的技术来评估和增强对抗性鲁棒性。在本研究中,我们利用技术威胁规避理论作为核心理论,提出了一个评估和增强预测分析应用的对抗鲁棒性的研究框架。我们通过开发一个健壮的文本分类系统ARText系统来实例化所提出的框架。与SML广泛启用的两个任务(垃圾邮件审查检测和垃圾邮件检测)的基准方法进行了严格的评估,从而证实了我们的ARText系统的实用性和有效性。大量实验结果表明,我们提出的框架可以显著增强预测分析应用程序的对抗鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information Systems is a widely recognized forum for the presentation of research that advances the practice and understanding of organizational information systems. It serves those investigating new modes of information delivery and the changing landscape of information policy making, as well as practitioners and executives managing the information resource.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Vulnerability Prioritization in Cloud Computing Using Multi-View Representation Learning Creating and Capturing Value with Physical-Digital Experiential Consumer Offerings Unintended Consequences of Disclosing Recommendations by Artificial Intelligence versus Humans on True and Fake News Believability and Engagement Board Interlocks with Information Technology Firms and Innovation Outcomes: A Resource Dependence Perspective Engagement and Crowding-Out Effects of Leaderboard Gamification on Medical Crowdfunding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1