Vocational education, tertiary education, and skill use across career stages

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY European Sociological Review Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcac074
W. Schulz, Heike Solga, Reinhard Pollak
{"title":"Vocational education, tertiary education, and skill use across career stages","authors":"W. Schulz, Heike Solga, Reinhard Pollak","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcac074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Vocational education enhances smooth transitions into the labour market. However, this initial advantage might vanish over the career and eventually turn into a disadvantage because the skills of vocationally trained workers become outdated faster. So far, research has examined this potential vocational trade-off by assessing labour market outcomes such as employment and income. This study uses a different approach, it directly examines how different types of skills used at work change over the career of vocationally trained workers compared to tertiary-educated workers, and how career events shape skill-use changes. With data from the German National Education Study (NEPS), we examine five skills use dimensions based on job-tasks measures: analytical, creative, managerial, interactive, and manual skills. We find that skill-use differentials between vocational and tertiary-educated workers are only small to modest. The clearest differences relate to analytical and manual skills. Looking across career stages, the observed skill-use differentials remain rather stable across career stages—thus, the vocational skill trade-off thesis is only partially supported. Occupational mobility and unemployment contribute to observable changes, whereas job-related further training does not. Our results challenge skill-based explanations of a vocational trade-off.","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac074","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vocational education enhances smooth transitions into the labour market. However, this initial advantage might vanish over the career and eventually turn into a disadvantage because the skills of vocationally trained workers become outdated faster. So far, research has examined this potential vocational trade-off by assessing labour market outcomes such as employment and income. This study uses a different approach, it directly examines how different types of skills used at work change over the career of vocationally trained workers compared to tertiary-educated workers, and how career events shape skill-use changes. With data from the German National Education Study (NEPS), we examine five skills use dimensions based on job-tasks measures: analytical, creative, managerial, interactive, and manual skills. We find that skill-use differentials between vocational and tertiary-educated workers are only small to modest. The clearest differences relate to analytical and manual skills. Looking across career stages, the observed skill-use differentials remain rather stable across career stages—thus, the vocational skill trade-off thesis is only partially supported. Occupational mobility and unemployment contribute to observable changes, whereas job-related further training does not. Our results challenge skill-based explanations of a vocational trade-off.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业教育、高等教育和跨职业阶段的技能使用
职业教育有助于平稳过渡到劳动力市场。然而,这种最初的优势可能会在职业生涯中消失,最终变成劣势,因为受过职业培训的工人的技能过时得更快。到目前为止,研究已经通过评估就业和收入等劳动力市场结果来检验这种潜在的职业权衡。这项研究采用了一种不同的方法,它直接考察了受过职业培训的工人与受过高等教育的工人相比,在工作中使用的不同类型的技能在职业生涯中是如何变化的,以及职业事件如何影响技能使用的变化。根据德国国家教育研究(NEPS)的数据,我们研究了基于工作任务测量的五个技能使用维度:分析、创新、管理、互动和手工技能。我们发现,职业工人和受过高等教育的工人之间的技能使用差异很小。最明显的区别在于分析和手工技能。纵观各职业阶段,所观察到的技能使用差异在各职业阶段保持相当稳定,因此,职业技能权衡理论仅得到部分支持。职业流动性和失业有助于观察到的变化,而与工作相关的进一步培训则没有。我们的研究结果挑战了基于技能的职业权衡解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
期刊最新文献
School composition and academic decisions Family structure and policy contexts: implications for tertiary education attainment in 25 European countries Steeper at the top: cognitive ability and earnings in Finland and Norway Online calls for protest and offline mobilization in autocracies: evidence from the 2017 Dey Protests in Iran Intensity of educational expansion: a key factor in explaining educational inequality across regions and cohorts in Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1