Geographical accessibility to the hemodialysis centers in Ardabil, Iran

Q3 Medicine Journal of Nephropharmacology Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI:10.34172/npj.2022.14
M. Ahmadi, M. Mashoufi, S. Barzegari, S. Mohammadi Kebar, S. Hoseininia, B. Hassanlouei, Hassan Setayeshi Nesaz, Reza Barzegari
{"title":"Geographical accessibility to the hemodialysis centers in Ardabil, Iran","authors":"M. Ahmadi, M. Mashoufi, S. Barzegari, S. Mohammadi Kebar, S. Hoseininia, B. Hassanlouei, Hassan Setayeshi Nesaz, Reza Barzegari","doi":"10.34172/npj.2022.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Hemodialysis patients should receive hemodialysis three times per week and 140- 160 times annually. The financial and temporal costs of continuing travel to hemodialysis centers affect the type of vascular access, treatment coherence, geographical distribution and mortality of patients. Objectives: In this study, the spatial distribution and geographical accessibility of patients to the hemodialysis center and its effect on mortality and vascular access have been investigated. Patients and Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was conducted on 315 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis in Bou-Ali hospital of Ardabil. Accessibility to the hemodialysis center was determined by calculating the time spent from the residence to the treatment center and analyzed by ArcGIS-10. In this study, accessibility was considered in less than 10 minutes. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between spatial accessibility and mortality and vascular access. To verify the correlation between different variables, Pearson’s correlation, Phi and Cramer’s V, and Eta tests were applied. Results: Among 315 patients, 161 patients (51.1%) were male and 277 (87.9%) patients were married. The mean age of patients was 62.7 ± 16.6 years. There were 170 illiterate patients (54%), 275 patients living in urban area (87.3%) and 132 patients as housewife (41.9%). Hospital records, showed 186 patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) (59%), 113 patients with central venous catheter (35.9%), since in 16 patients type of vascular access (5.1%) was not mentioned. Twenty patients (6.3%) died due to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), of which 11 were female. Additionally, eight patients (2.5%) were forced to migrate to nearby areas due to inappropriate accessibility to the hemodialysis services. The results showed a negative correlation between proximity to hemodialysis center and the prevalence of hemodialysis in women and men and the number of population in each time period. The spatial accessibility to the hemodialysis center did not correlate with the patient’s mortality and type of vascular access. Conclusion: Due to the high prevalence of hemodialysis patients in the vicinity of the hemodialysis center, there is a concern that ESRD patients in rural or remote areas are not properly diagnosed or died without referral to health centers. It can be declared that one of the main reasons for the low-prevalence in remote areas is the issue of spatial accessibility. The results of this study indicated the need for further studies on the prevalence and identification of ESRD in rural areas and the causes of the disease, in order to clarify the issue’s dimensions.","PeriodicalId":16388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2022.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Hemodialysis patients should receive hemodialysis three times per week and 140- 160 times annually. The financial and temporal costs of continuing travel to hemodialysis centers affect the type of vascular access, treatment coherence, geographical distribution and mortality of patients. Objectives: In this study, the spatial distribution and geographical accessibility of patients to the hemodialysis center and its effect on mortality and vascular access have been investigated. Patients and Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was conducted on 315 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis in Bou-Ali hospital of Ardabil. Accessibility to the hemodialysis center was determined by calculating the time spent from the residence to the treatment center and analyzed by ArcGIS-10. In this study, accessibility was considered in less than 10 minutes. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between spatial accessibility and mortality and vascular access. To verify the correlation between different variables, Pearson’s correlation, Phi and Cramer’s V, and Eta tests were applied. Results: Among 315 patients, 161 patients (51.1%) were male and 277 (87.9%) patients were married. The mean age of patients was 62.7 ± 16.6 years. There were 170 illiterate patients (54%), 275 patients living in urban area (87.3%) and 132 patients as housewife (41.9%). Hospital records, showed 186 patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) (59%), 113 patients with central venous catheter (35.9%), since in 16 patients type of vascular access (5.1%) was not mentioned. Twenty patients (6.3%) died due to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), of which 11 were female. Additionally, eight patients (2.5%) were forced to migrate to nearby areas due to inappropriate accessibility to the hemodialysis services. The results showed a negative correlation between proximity to hemodialysis center and the prevalence of hemodialysis in women and men and the number of population in each time period. The spatial accessibility to the hemodialysis center did not correlate with the patient’s mortality and type of vascular access. Conclusion: Due to the high prevalence of hemodialysis patients in the vicinity of the hemodialysis center, there is a concern that ESRD patients in rural or remote areas are not properly diagnosed or died without referral to health centers. It can be declared that one of the main reasons for the low-prevalence in remote areas is the issue of spatial accessibility. The results of this study indicated the need for further studies on the prevalence and identification of ESRD in rural areas and the causes of the disease, in order to clarify the issue’s dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗阿达比尔血液透析中心的地理可达性
血液透析患者应每周透析3次,每年透析140- 160次。持续前往血液透析中心的经济和时间成本影响血管通路的类型、治疗一致性、地理分布和患者的死亡率。目的:研究血透中心患者的空间分布、地理可达性及其对死亡率和血管可达性的影响。患者和方法:本描述性分析研究对315例在阿达比尔市boui - ali医院接受血液透析治疗的慢性肾衰竭患者进行了分析。通过计算从住所到治疗中心所花费的时间来确定血液透析中心的可达性,并通过ArcGIS-10进行分析。在这项研究中,可达性在不到10分钟的时间内被考虑。Logistic回归分析了空间可达性与死亡率和血管可达性之间的关系。为了验证不同变量之间的相关性,我们采用Pearson’s correlation、Phi and Cramer’s V和Eta检验。结果:315例患者中,男性161例(51.1%),已婚277例(87.9%)。患者平均年龄62.7±16.6岁。其中文盲170例(54%),城区275例(87.3%),家庭主妇132例(41.9%)。医院记录显示,186例患者有动静脉瘘(AVF)(59%), 113例患者有中心静脉导管(35.9%),其中16例患者未提及血管通路类型(5.1%)。20例(6.3%)患者死于终末期肾病(ESRD),其中11例为女性。此外,由于无法获得血液透析服务,8名患者(2.5%)被迫迁移到附近地区。结果显示,各时间段血液透析中心距离与男女血液透析患病率及人口数量呈负相关。血液透析中心的空间可达性与患者死亡率和血管通道类型无关。结论:由于血液透析中心附近地区血液透析患者的高发率,存在农村或偏远地区ESRD患者未得到正确诊断或未转诊到卫生中心就死亡的问题。可以说,空间可达性问题是导致偏远地区患病率低的主要原因之一。这项研究的结果表明,需要进一步研究农村地区ESRD的流行情况和确定情况及其原因,以便澄清问题的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nephropharmacology
Journal of Nephropharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effect of montelukast drug in improving the clinical condition of patients with COVID-19 in referral hospitals in Isfahan; a randomized clinical trial Renal insufficiency in breast cancer patients; a review study The Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy; a promising step toward better treating the disease Emerging cancer in individuals with cardiovascular disease: Exploring the intersection of reverse cardio-oncology and nephropharmacology Oncocardiology: close collaboration between oncologists, cardiologists, and nephrologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1