African Perceptions of Trade Partners: A Ghanaian and Togolese Perspective of Sino-African Relations

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES Insight on Africa Pub Date : 2020-06-03 DOI:10.1177/0975087820923995
Akorkor Kehinde Awoonor, J. Forson
{"title":"African Perceptions of Trade Partners: A Ghanaian and Togolese Perspective of Sino-African Relations","authors":"Akorkor Kehinde Awoonor, J. Forson","doi":"10.1177/0975087820923995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on perception in both development studies and international relations have shown that most nations have mutual perceptions predicated on and influenced by either fact, biases or stereotypes, or a combination of other identifiable qualitative variables. In this study, we explore and demonstrate that African perceptions differ from country to country and are well influenced by factors such as the country of origin, the knowledge base and orientation towards China. The connection between Africa and China is long etched in history (206 bce to 220 ce) evidenced by a series of cultural and trade exchanges between China and Egypt, and long since antiquated in historical records by the Chinese traveller, Du Huan, of the Tang Dynasty. With a combination of primary and secondary data collected via social survey using google forms with questionnaires administered to participants of 10 and 6 tertiary institutions in Ghana and Togo, respectively, and bolstered with documentary evidence, we find that there are no singular overarching African perceptions of China, as the African continent is a 55-state region with diverse conflicting political, economic and sociocultural proclivities. The study further observed that compared to Togolese, more Ghanaians perceive China to be a goodwill partner predicated on its involvement on public health emergencies of international concerns (PHEIC) and influence on national economies through debt reliefs and other form of assistance.","PeriodicalId":42199,"journal":{"name":"Insight on Africa","volume":"12 1","pages":"104 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0975087820923995","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight on Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087820923995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Studies on perception in both development studies and international relations have shown that most nations have mutual perceptions predicated on and influenced by either fact, biases or stereotypes, or a combination of other identifiable qualitative variables. In this study, we explore and demonstrate that African perceptions differ from country to country and are well influenced by factors such as the country of origin, the knowledge base and orientation towards China. The connection between Africa and China is long etched in history (206 bce to 220 ce) evidenced by a series of cultural and trade exchanges between China and Egypt, and long since antiquated in historical records by the Chinese traveller, Du Huan, of the Tang Dynasty. With a combination of primary and secondary data collected via social survey using google forms with questionnaires administered to participants of 10 and 6 tertiary institutions in Ghana and Togo, respectively, and bolstered with documentary evidence, we find that there are no singular overarching African perceptions of China, as the African continent is a 55-state region with diverse conflicting political, economic and sociocultural proclivities. The study further observed that compared to Togolese, more Ghanaians perceive China to be a goodwill partner predicated on its involvement on public health emergencies of international concerns (PHEIC) and influence on national economies through debt reliefs and other form of assistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲人对贸易伙伴的看法:加纳和多哥视角下的中非关系
发展研究和国际关系中关于看法的研究表明,大多数国家的相互看法基于事实、偏见或陈规定型观念,或其他可识别的定性变量的组合,并受其影响。在本研究中,我们探索并证明了非洲人的看法因国家而异,并受到原籍国、知识基础和对中国的取向等因素的影响。中国与非洲的联系在历史上(公元前206年至公元前220年)早已刻下铭心,中国与埃及之间的一系列文化和贸易交流证明了这一点,而中国唐代旅行家杜欢的历史记录早就表明了这一点。通过使用谷歌表格对加纳和多哥的10所和6所高等教育机构的参与者进行问卷调查,并结合文献证据收集的第一手和二手数据,我们发现非洲人对中国没有单一的总体看法,因为非洲大陆是一个55个国家的地区,政治、经济和社会文化倾向相互冲突。研究进一步指出,与多哥人相比,更多的加纳人认为中国是一个善意的合作伙伴,因为中国参与了国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC),并通过债务减免和其他形式的援助对国民经济产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insight on Africa
Insight on Africa AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: nsight on Africa is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal covering contemporary African affairs and issues of policy relevance. It focuses on, though not confined to, foreign policies and developmental issues of African countries. The journal specially encourages article submission on issues related to emerging powers in Africa, BRICS in Africa and Afro-Asian relations. The journal is owned by African Studies Association of India (ASA India) located at Centre for African Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and its publication is managed by Policy Research Institute of African Studies Association (PRIASA) based in New Delhi.
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the Link Between Bilateral Investment Treaties and Environmental Sustainability in Sub-Saharan African Countries Book review: Nathanael Ojong (Ed.), Off-Grid Solar Electrification in Africa: A Critical Perspective Ethio-Eritrean Relation: From Jubilant Liaison to Paroxysm Hostility Since 2018 Same Game, Different Participation in Nigeria: A qualitative study of (2006) National Gender Policy The Effect of Violent Extremism on Local Conflicts and Vice Versa: Differences and Similarities among Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1