Extreme quantile spillovers and connectedness between oil and Chinese sector markets: A portfolio hedging analysis

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00327
Walid Mensi , Mohammad Alomari , Xuan Vinh Vo , Sang Hoon Kang
{"title":"Extreme quantile spillovers and connectedness between oil and Chinese sector markets: A portfolio hedging analysis","authors":"Walid Mensi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alomari ,&nbsp;Xuan Vinh Vo ,&nbsp;Sang Hoon Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oil price instabilities have direct and heterogeneous implications for stock sector markets as a result of portfolio risk management and fund allocations. Previous studies have shown that the oil-stock market nexus is asymmetric and strongly vulnerable to international events. Using daily data of ten Chinese stock sector indices and the West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures over the period from July 2, 2007, to September 3, 2021, we examine the quantile return spillovers and interconnectedness between these markets using the approach of Ando et al. (2022), showing that return spillovers between the markets under investigation are more pronounced under bearish market conditions than during bullish ones. Major financial, political, energy, and COVID-19 pandemic events have magnified spillovers. Irrespective of the state of the market, oil is always a net receiver of return spillovers. Moreover, for all sectors other than materials, the sector that acts as a net receiver during bearish market conditions becomes a net contributor during bullish market conditions, and vice versa. During the COVID-19 period, the hedging technique was the most cost-effective. In the event of a global pandemic, the IT, financial, telecommunication, and energy sectors can benefit from oil's higher hedging effectiveness. Oil was a cheaper hedging asset during the pandemic, and it offered the highest hedging effectiveness to utilities before the outbreak and to the financial sector during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e00327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil price instabilities have direct and heterogeneous implications for stock sector markets as a result of portfolio risk management and fund allocations. Previous studies have shown that the oil-stock market nexus is asymmetric and strongly vulnerable to international events. Using daily data of ten Chinese stock sector indices and the West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures over the period from July 2, 2007, to September 3, 2021, we examine the quantile return spillovers and interconnectedness between these markets using the approach of Ando et al. (2022), showing that return spillovers between the markets under investigation are more pronounced under bearish market conditions than during bullish ones. Major financial, political, energy, and COVID-19 pandemic events have magnified spillovers. Irrespective of the state of the market, oil is always a net receiver of return spillovers. Moreover, for all sectors other than materials, the sector that acts as a net receiver during bearish market conditions becomes a net contributor during bullish market conditions, and vice versa. During the COVID-19 period, the hedging technique was the most cost-effective. In the event of a global pandemic, the IT, financial, telecommunication, and energy sectors can benefit from oil's higher hedging effectiveness. Oil was a cheaper hedging asset during the pandemic, and it offered the highest hedging effectiveness to utilities before the outbreak and to the financial sector during the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石油和中国行业市场之间的极端分位数溢出和连通性:一个投资组合对冲分析
由于投资组合风险管理和基金配置,油价不稳定对股票市场有直接和异质的影响。先前的研究表明,石油-股票市场关系是不对称的,并且极易受到国际事件的影响。利用2007年7月2日至2021年9月3日期间10个中国股市指数和西德克萨斯中质原油期货的每日数据,我们使用Ando等人(2022)的方法检验了这些市场之间的分位数回报溢出效应和相互关联性,结果表明,在看跌市场条件下,被调查市场之间的回报溢出效应比看涨市场条件下更为明显。重大金融、政治、能源和COVID-19大流行事件放大了溢出效应。无论市场状况如何,石油总是回报溢出效应的净接受者。此外,对于除材料以外的所有行业,在看跌市场条件下充当净接受者的行业在看涨市场条件下成为净贡献者,反之亦然。在新冠肺炎疫情期间,对冲技术是最具成本效益的。在发生全球性流行病的情况下,IT、金融、电信和能源部门可以从石油较高的对冲效率中受益。在疫情期间,石油是一种更便宜的对冲资产,在疫情爆发前,石油为公用事业提供了最高的对冲效率,在COVID-19大流行期间,石油为金融部门提供了最高的对冲效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1