Primordial Haptics, 1925–1935: Hands, Tools and the Psychotechnics of Prehistory

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Body & Society Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI:10.1177/1357034X211008239
Max Stadler
{"title":"Primordial Haptics, 1925–1935: Hands, Tools and the Psychotechnics of Prehistory","authors":"Max Stadler","doi":"10.1177/1357034X211008239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Psychotechnics’, Weimar Germany’s science du jour, typically is framed as a symptom of ‘technological media’ – obscuring the persistent significance of ‘dexterity’, ‘skill’ and ‘manual labour’ at the time. More broadly, there is a tendency to construe ‘the haptic’ as predominantly a casualty of modernity: skilled hands replaced by conveyor belts; skilled hands defended by the rearguard actions of arts-and-crafts movements; skilled hands destroyed by industrialized warfare. Drawing on contemporary investigations into the ‘organ of touch’, this essay aims to complicate this picture by reconstructing the proto-ergonomic project of Friedrich Herig, a German engineer, amateur prehistorian and expert on craft labour who rose to distinction in the 1920s as a designer of ‘ideal’ hand tools. Herig’s eclectic sources of inspiration reveal that matters of ‘touch’, far from obsolete, were intimately bound up with matters of tools – their design, uses and putative origins – and thus, with matters of (manual) labour.","PeriodicalId":47568,"journal":{"name":"Body & Society","volume":"28 1","pages":"60 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1357034X211008239","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X211008239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Psychotechnics’, Weimar Germany’s science du jour, typically is framed as a symptom of ‘technological media’ – obscuring the persistent significance of ‘dexterity’, ‘skill’ and ‘manual labour’ at the time. More broadly, there is a tendency to construe ‘the haptic’ as predominantly a casualty of modernity: skilled hands replaced by conveyor belts; skilled hands defended by the rearguard actions of arts-and-crafts movements; skilled hands destroyed by industrialized warfare. Drawing on contemporary investigations into the ‘organ of touch’, this essay aims to complicate this picture by reconstructing the proto-ergonomic project of Friedrich Herig, a German engineer, amateur prehistorian and expert on craft labour who rose to distinction in the 1920s as a designer of ‘ideal’ hand tools. Herig’s eclectic sources of inspiration reveal that matters of ‘touch’, far from obsolete, were intimately bound up with matters of tools – their design, uses and putative origins – and thus, with matters of (manual) labour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原始触觉,1925-1935:手,工具和史前的心理技术
“心理技术”是魏玛德国的科学,通常被认为是“技术媒体”的症状——掩盖了当时“灵巧”、“技能”和“体力劳动”的持久意义。更广泛地说,有一种倾向将“触觉”主要解释为现代化的牺牲品:熟练的双手被传送带取代;技艺精湛的手被工艺美术运动的后卫动作所保护;熟练的双手被工业化战争摧毁。根据当代对“触觉器官”的调查,本文旨在通过重建弗里德里希·赫利格(Friedrich Herig)的原始人体工程学项目,使这一情况复杂化。赫利格是一位德国工程师,业余史前学家和手工劳动专家,他在20世纪20年代因“理想”手工工具的设计师而出名。Herig不拘一格的灵感来源表明,“触摸”问题远没有过时,而是与工具问题密切相关——它们的设计、用途和假定的起源——因此,与(手工)劳动问题密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Body & Society
Body & Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Body & Society has from its inception in March 1995 as a companion journal to Theory, Culture & Society, pioneered and shaped the field of body-studies. It has been committed to theoretical openness characterized by the publication of a wide range of critical approaches to the body, alongside the encouragement and development of innovative work that contains a trans-disciplinary focus. The disciplines reflected in the journal have included anthropology, art history, communications, cultural history, cultural studies, environmental studies, feminism, film studies, health studies, leisure studies, medical history, philosophy, psychology, religious studies, science studies, sociology and sport studies.
期刊最新文献
Efficiency and the Productive Body: The Gilbreths’ Photographic Motion Studies of Work On the Embodied Experience of Anti-abortion Laws and Regulations: The Gendered Burden of ‘Abortion Work’ Michel Serres’s Sensorial Philosophy and the Importance of Skin in Francis Bacon’s Nudes Sensing a Heartbeat: A New Perspective on Self-Tracking Technologies through the Integration of Interoception Embroidering Infertility: Using Art to Reveal and Resist Technobiopower in In Vitro Fertilisation Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1