The cross-level double-edged-sword effect of boundary-spanning behavior on creativity

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY 心理学报 Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2020.01340
Jinqiang Zhu, Shiyong Xu, Jinyi Zhou, Bainan Zhang, Fangfang Xu, Boqiang Zong
{"title":"The cross-level double-edged-sword effect of boundary-spanning behavior on creativity","authors":"Jinqiang Zhu, Shiyong Xu, Jinyi Zhou, Bainan Zhang, Fangfang Xu, Boqiang Zong","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1041.2020.01340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been much interest in boundary spanning behavior recently. The existing studies about boundary spanning behavior focus on its positive outcome from the perspective of social network. In the decades, research has consistently demonstrated that the boundary spanning behavior produces a wide array of positive outcomes for team and organizations. However, scholars recently found that the boundary spanning behavior have negative outcoms for individuals. Based on the conservation of resources theory (COR), we examined the double-edged sword effect of boundary spanning behavior on creativity on different levels, the mediating mechanism and boundary conditions. To test the proposed theoretical model, we used multi-waves and multi-source research design. The data was collected from the dyads employees and supervisors in the enterprise. At time 1, boundary spanning behavior, role stress, and role breadth self-efficacy were measured. These variables were rated by employees. About one month later, we asked leaders to rate employees’ creativity. These variables were assessed by mature scales. A total of 536 employees (90.32%) and 111 leaders (82.22%) responded to our survey. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and average variance extracted (AVE) were conducted to assess the discriminant validity and convergence validity of the key variables. Multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) was used to test the hypothsis and the Monte Carlo simulation procedures by the open-source software R to test mediation effects. The results showed that in the team level, team boundary spanning behavior had significantly positive effect on team creativity (β = 0.18, p < 0.05), but in the","PeriodicalId":36627,"journal":{"name":"心理学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"心理学报","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2020.01340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There has been much interest in boundary spanning behavior recently. The existing studies about boundary spanning behavior focus on its positive outcome from the perspective of social network. In the decades, research has consistently demonstrated that the boundary spanning behavior produces a wide array of positive outcomes for team and organizations. However, scholars recently found that the boundary spanning behavior have negative outcoms for individuals. Based on the conservation of resources theory (COR), we examined the double-edged sword effect of boundary spanning behavior on creativity on different levels, the mediating mechanism and boundary conditions. To test the proposed theoretical model, we used multi-waves and multi-source research design. The data was collected from the dyads employees and supervisors in the enterprise. At time 1, boundary spanning behavior, role stress, and role breadth self-efficacy were measured. These variables were rated by employees. About one month later, we asked leaders to rate employees’ creativity. These variables were assessed by mature scales. A total of 536 employees (90.32%) and 111 leaders (82.22%) responded to our survey. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and average variance extracted (AVE) were conducted to assess the discriminant validity and convergence validity of the key variables. Multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) was used to test the hypothsis and the Monte Carlo simulation procedures by the open-source software R to test mediation effects. The results showed that in the team level, team boundary spanning behavior had significantly positive effect on team creativity (β = 0.18, p < 0.05), but in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨界行为对创造力的跨层次双刃剑效应
近年来,人们对边界跨越行为产生了浓厚的兴趣。现有的跨界行为研究主要从社会网络的角度关注跨界行为的积极结果。在过去的几十年里,研究一直表明,跨界行为会给团队和组织带来一系列积极的结果。然而,学者们最近发现,跨界行为对个体有负面影响。基于资源守恒理论,研究了跨界行为在不同层次上对创造力的双刃剑效应、中介机制和边界条件。为了验证提出的理论模型,我们采用了多波和多源的研究设计。数据是从企业的两名员工和主管那里收集的。时间1时,测量边界跨越行为、角色压力和角色广度自我效能感。这些变量由员工打分。大约一个月后,我们请领导给员工的创造力打分。这些变量采用成熟量表进行评估。共有536名员工(90.32%)和111名领导(82.22%)参与了我们的调查。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和平均方差提取(AVE)来评估关键变量的判别效度和收敛效度。采用多水平结构方程模型(MSEM)对假设进行检验,并利用开源软件R进行蒙特卡罗模拟程序对中介效应进行检验。结果表明,在团队层面,团队边界跨越行为对团队创造力有显著的正向影响(β = 0.18, p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
心理学报
心理学报 Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1612
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Opportunity (in)equity affects outcome evaluation at an early cognitive stage: Evidence from event-related potentials How the dimension of negative emotional motivation influences time perception: The mediating role of attention control and attention bias Identity embarrassment and identity defense: The development of organizational identity of dispatched employees The double-edged sword effect of employee personal initiative behavior on coworker relationships: The moderating role of the employee warmth trait The role of stroke nodes in the recognition of Chinese characters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1