The effects of cataclysm-related stress on rumination patterns: The case of COVID-19.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Professional Psychology-Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.1037/pro0000478
Yangqian Shen, Jennie Park-Taylor
{"title":"The effects of cataclysm-related stress on rumination patterns: The case of COVID-19.","authors":"Yangqian Shen, Jennie Park-Taylor","doi":"10.1037/pro0000478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a demonstrated association between rumination and everyday stress, there is a paucity of research on how cataclysm-related stress impacts the two subtypes of rumination (brooding and reflection). Beginning in March of 2020, the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) swiftly spread across the world, causing great tension and threat to peoples' lives. The present study examined whether and how rumination status (brooding and reflection) was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspectives of environmental stressors and perceived intrinsic stress. This study applied a cross-sectional design based on current and retrospective memories regarding participants' experiences of rumination, stress and anxiety. A total of 101 adults from the New York metropolitan area completed surveys that measure rumination, environmental stressors, perceived intrinsic stress, and anxiety symptoms based on their current experience during the cataclysmic event of COVID-19 and their recalled experience before the pandemic. Results indicated that changes in the environmental stressors significantly predicted changes in participants' engagement in reflection, but not in brooding, while changes in the levels of perceived intrinsic stress significantly predicted changes in brooding, but not in reflection. It was also found that rumination moderated the effects of external stressors on anxiety symptoms. Clinical interventions that reduce brooding activities and modify reflection activities could help individuals cope with the stress of a cataclysmic event in different ways. Public Significance Statement Results of this COVID-19-focused study indicated that changes in environmental stressors significantly predicted changes in participants' reflection activity, but not in brooding, while changes in levels of perceived intrinsic stress significantly predicted changes in brooding, but not in reflection. These results point to the need for clinical interventions that reduce brooding activities and modify reflection activities to help individuals cope with the stress of a cataclysmic event.","PeriodicalId":48217,"journal":{"name":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a demonstrated association between rumination and everyday stress, there is a paucity of research on how cataclysm-related stress impacts the two subtypes of rumination (brooding and reflection). Beginning in March of 2020, the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) swiftly spread across the world, causing great tension and threat to peoples' lives. The present study examined whether and how rumination status (brooding and reflection) was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, from the perspectives of environmental stressors and perceived intrinsic stress. This study applied a cross-sectional design based on current and retrospective memories regarding participants' experiences of rumination, stress and anxiety. A total of 101 adults from the New York metropolitan area completed surveys that measure rumination, environmental stressors, perceived intrinsic stress, and anxiety symptoms based on their current experience during the cataclysmic event of COVID-19 and their recalled experience before the pandemic. Results indicated that changes in the environmental stressors significantly predicted changes in participants' engagement in reflection, but not in brooding, while changes in the levels of perceived intrinsic stress significantly predicted changes in brooding, but not in reflection. It was also found that rumination moderated the effects of external stressors on anxiety symptoms. Clinical interventions that reduce brooding activities and modify reflection activities could help individuals cope with the stress of a cataclysmic event in different ways. Public Significance Statement Results of this COVID-19-focused study indicated that changes in environmental stressors significantly predicted changes in participants' reflection activity, but not in brooding, while changes in levels of perceived intrinsic stress significantly predicted changes in brooding, but not in reflection. These results point to the need for clinical interventions that reduce brooding activities and modify reflection activities to help individuals cope with the stress of a cataclysmic event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巨灾相关压力对反刍模式的影响:以COVID-19为例
尽管反刍与日常压力之间存在明显的联系,但关于与灾难相关的压力如何影响反刍的两种亚型(沉思和反思)的研究却很少。从2020年3月开始,2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)迅速在世界各地蔓延,给人们的生活造成了巨大的紧张和威胁。本研究从环境压力源和感知的内在压力的角度考察了沉思状态(沉思和反思)是否以及如何受到新冠肺炎大流行的影响。这项研究采用了一种基于当前和回顾性记忆的横断面设计,涉及参与者的沉思、压力和焦虑经历。来自纽约大都会区的101名成年人完成了调查,根据他们在新冠肺炎灾难性事件中的当前经历和他们在大流行前的回忆,测量了沉思、环境压力源、感知的内在压力和焦虑症状。结果表明,环境压力源的变化显著预测了参与者参与反思的变化,但没有预测到沉思的变化,而感知的内在压力水平的变化则显著预测了沉思的变化。研究还发现,沉思调节了外部压力源对焦虑症状的影响。减少沉思活动和改变反思活动的临床干预措施可以帮助个人以不同的方式应对灾难性事件的压力。这项以COVID-19为重点的研究的公共意义声明结果表明,环境压力源的变化显著预测了参与者反思活动的变化,但在沉思中没有,而感知的内在压力水平的变化显著预计了沉思的变化,而在反思中没有。这些结果表明,需要进行临床干预,减少沉思活动,改变反思活动,以帮助个人应对灾难性事件的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice
Professional Psychology-Research and Practice PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice® publishes articles on the application of psychology, including the scientific underpinnings of the profession of psychology. Articles that present assessment, treatment, and practice implications are encouraged. Both data-based and theoretical articles on techniques and practices used in the application of psychology are acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Developing Therapists' Multicultural Orientation Using Web-Based Deliberate Practice: An Initial Feasibility, Usability, and Acceptability Study. Supplemental Material for Identifying Risk Factors for Compassion Fatigue in Psychologists in Aotearoa, New Zealand, During the COVID-19 Pandemic Effectiveness of a 9-month queer- and trans-affirming training for mental health providers: A waitlist control group design. Identifying risk factors for compassion fatigue in psychologists in Aotearoa, New Zealand, during the COVID-19 pandemic. What do trauma workers experience when assisting refugee survivors of torture and trauma? A narrative inquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1