Barriers to Weight Loss and Physical Activity, and Coach Approaches to Addressing Barriers, in a Real-World Adaptation of the DPP Lifestyle Intervention: A Process Analysis
{"title":"Barriers to Weight Loss and Physical Activity, and Coach Approaches to Addressing Barriers, in a Real-World Adaptation of the DPP Lifestyle Intervention: A Process Analysis","authors":"L. Delahanty, P. Trief, D. Cibula, R. Weinstock","doi":"10.1177/0145721719883615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to weight loss and physical activity, as well as approaches used by coaches, in a real-world, community sample of adults with metabolic syndrome (at risk for type 2 diabetes) who participated in a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)–adapted weight loss intervention and compare findings to data from the screened and highly selected DPP sample. Methods SHINE (Support, Health Information, Nutrition, and Exercise) was a telephonic DPP adaptation. Primary care staff delivered the DPP curriculum, and lifestyle coaches provided monthly direction to achieve weight loss. For this substudy, barriers to weight loss and physical activity described by participants, as well as approaches coaches used to address them, were gathered. Groupings of barriers (DPP defined) were analyzed in relation to demographic characteristics and compared to data from the DPP sample. Results Top weight loss barriers were problems with self-monitoring, too little physical activity, internal thought/mood cues, vacation/holidays, and social cues. Percentages reporting a barrier were much higher in SHINE. Top physical activity barriers were problems with self-monitoring, access/weather, time management, aches/pains, and vacation/holidays. These did not correspond closely to DPP data. Coaches used problem solving, self-monitoring skills review, increased physical activity, and motivational strategies. SHINE coaches were more likely than DPP coaches to use alternative approaches. Conclusions Barriers to weight loss and physical activity in a community sample of persons at risk for diabetes occurred at much higher rates than in the highly screened DPP sample. Training coaches in a variety of patient-centered approaches may maximize their positive impact.","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":"45 1","pages":"596 - 606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721719883615","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719883615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to weight loss and physical activity, as well as approaches used by coaches, in a real-world, community sample of adults with metabolic syndrome (at risk for type 2 diabetes) who participated in a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)–adapted weight loss intervention and compare findings to data from the screened and highly selected DPP sample. Methods SHINE (Support, Health Information, Nutrition, and Exercise) was a telephonic DPP adaptation. Primary care staff delivered the DPP curriculum, and lifestyle coaches provided monthly direction to achieve weight loss. For this substudy, barriers to weight loss and physical activity described by participants, as well as approaches coaches used to address them, were gathered. Groupings of barriers (DPP defined) were analyzed in relation to demographic characteristics and compared to data from the DPP sample. Results Top weight loss barriers were problems with self-monitoring, too little physical activity, internal thought/mood cues, vacation/holidays, and social cues. Percentages reporting a barrier were much higher in SHINE. Top physical activity barriers were problems with self-monitoring, access/weather, time management, aches/pains, and vacation/holidays. These did not correspond closely to DPP data. Coaches used problem solving, self-monitoring skills review, increased physical activity, and motivational strategies. SHINE coaches were more likely than DPP coaches to use alternative approaches. Conclusions Barriers to weight loss and physical activity in a community sample of persons at risk for diabetes occurred at much higher rates than in the highly screened DPP sample. Training coaches in a variety of patient-centered approaches may maximize their positive impact.
本研究的目的是确定减肥和体育活动的障碍,以及教练使用的方法,在现实世界中,参与糖尿病预防计划(DPP)适应减肥干预的代谢综合征成人社区样本(有2型糖尿病风险),并将研究结果与筛选和高度选择的DPP样本的数据进行比较。方法SHINE (Support, Health Information, Nutrition, and Exercise)是一种电话DPP改编。初级保健人员提供DPP课程,生活方式教练每月提供减肥指导。在这个子研究中,收集了参与者描述的减肥和体育活动的障碍,以及教练用来解决这些障碍的方法。分析障碍分组(DPP定义)与人口统计学特征的关系,并与DPP样本的数据进行比较。结果:最大的减肥障碍是自我监控问题、身体活动太少、内部思想/情绪线索、假期/假期和社会线索。在SHINE中报告障碍的百分比要高得多。最主要的体育活动障碍是自我监控、出入/天气、时间管理、疼痛/疼痛和假期/假期问题。这些数据与民进党的数据并不吻合。教练使用了解决问题、自我监控技能回顾、增加体育活动和激励策略。SHINE教练比DPP教练更有可能使用替代方法。结论:在糖尿病高危人群的社区样本中,体重减轻和身体活动障碍的发生率远高于经过高度筛选的DPP样本。以各种以患者为中心的方法培训教练员可以最大限度地发挥其积极影响。
期刊介绍:
The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management.
TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary profession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.