Comparison of Lower Extremity Long Bone Fracture Surgery Results between Obese and Non-obese Patients

Nasrollah Jamshidi Gohari, Mahmood Karimi Mobarake, A. Sadeghifar
{"title":"Comparison of Lower Extremity Long Bone Fracture Surgery Results between Obese and Non-obese Patients","authors":"Nasrollah Jamshidi Gohari, Mahmood Karimi Mobarake, A. Sadeghifar","doi":"10.34172/jkmu.2023.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Obesity is a growing epidemic in developed countries which leads to an increase in the percentage of obese people in the orthopedic trauma population and affects patients’ postoperative period. Lower extremity long bone fractures are among the most common fractures and lead to significant complications, prolonged hospitalization, and heavy financial burden on the community health networks. Methods: In this cohort study, all patients with lower extremity long bone fractures (tibia or femur) treated in Bahonar hospital in Kerman were included using the simple sampling method. Then, they were divided into two groups based on BMI (patients with BMI greater than or equal to 30 were considered obese, and with BMI less than 30 were considered non-obese) and followed up for one year after treatment. Results: Our study was conducted on two groups, each including 65 people, of obese and non-obese people with lower extremity fractures. In statistical studies, no significant difference was found between the obese and non-obese groups in terms of underlying disease (P=0.1), fracture site (P=0.130), open or closed fracture (P=0.283), type of surgery (P=0.217), and fracture complications (P=0.699). Conclusion: According to this study, there is no significant relationship between the complications of lower extremity long bone fractures in obese and non-obese people; it seems that after the incidence of fracture, mostly systemic complications should be considered in obese people. Finally, considering the differences between the results of this study and similar studies and genetic and ethnic differences in other parts of Iran, conducting further studies in this field with larger sample sizes in different geographical locations is recommended.","PeriodicalId":39002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jkmu.2023.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a growing epidemic in developed countries which leads to an increase in the percentage of obese people in the orthopedic trauma population and affects patients’ postoperative period. Lower extremity long bone fractures are among the most common fractures and lead to significant complications, prolonged hospitalization, and heavy financial burden on the community health networks. Methods: In this cohort study, all patients with lower extremity long bone fractures (tibia or femur) treated in Bahonar hospital in Kerman were included using the simple sampling method. Then, they were divided into two groups based on BMI (patients with BMI greater than or equal to 30 were considered obese, and with BMI less than 30 were considered non-obese) and followed up for one year after treatment. Results: Our study was conducted on two groups, each including 65 people, of obese and non-obese people with lower extremity fractures. In statistical studies, no significant difference was found between the obese and non-obese groups in terms of underlying disease (P=0.1), fracture site (P=0.130), open or closed fracture (P=0.283), type of surgery (P=0.217), and fracture complications (P=0.699). Conclusion: According to this study, there is no significant relationship between the complications of lower extremity long bone fractures in obese and non-obese people; it seems that after the incidence of fracture, mostly systemic complications should be considered in obese people. Finally, considering the differences between the results of this study and similar studies and genetic and ethnic differences in other parts of Iran, conducting further studies in this field with larger sample sizes in different geographical locations is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖与非肥胖患者下肢长骨骨折手术效果比较
背景:肥胖在发达国家日益流行,导致肥胖者在骨科创伤人群中的比例增加,并影响患者的术后时期。下肢长骨骨折是最常见的骨折之一,会导致严重并发症、住院时间延长,并给社区卫生网络带来沉重的经济负担。方法:在本队列研究中,采用简单抽样方法纳入在克尔曼巴霍纳尔医院接受治疗的所有下肢长骨骨折(胫骨或股骨)患者。然后,根据BMI将他们分为两组(BMI大于或等于30的患者被视为肥胖,BMI小于30的患者则被视为非肥胖),并在治疗后随访一年。结果:我们的研究分为两组,每组65人,分别为肥胖和非肥胖的下肢骨折患者。在统计研究中,肥胖组和非肥胖组在潜在疾病(P=0.1)、骨折部位(P=0.130)、开放性或闭合性骨折(P=0.283)、手术类型(P=0.217)和骨折并发症(P=0.699)方面没有显著差异,肥胖者和非肥胖者下肢长骨骨折并发症之间没有显著关系;看来,在骨折发生后,肥胖者应考虑大多数系统性并发症。最后,考虑到这项研究的结果与类似研究的差异以及伊朗其他地区的遗传和种族差异,建议在不同地理位置进行更大样本量的该领域进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccination and Tinnitus: A Case Report Clinical Risk Factors of Systemic Antimony Treatment Failure in Patients with Acute Cutaneous leishmaniasis referred to the Dermatology Clinics of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran Evaluation of the Effects of Fasting During the Holy Month of Ramadan on Patients with Epileptic Attacks Who Visited the Emergency Room Effects of Foot Dry Cupping in Diabetic Distal Polyneuropathy: A Pilot Controlled Clinical Trial Preoperative Orbital CT Scan Findings in Patients with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and its Impact on Surgical Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1