{"title":"Epistemic Matrices In The Construction Of Knowledge On Learning in Organizations","authors":"D. Durante, Antonio Carlos Coelho","doi":"10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our critical epistemic review examines how researchers deal with the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations from the standpoint of cognitive interests. We adopted the epistemic matrices’ analytical model elaborated by Paes de Paula (2016), who handles the creation of knowledge based on cognitive interests and epistemic reconstruction, as an alternative to the paradigms of Burrel and Morgan (1979). The object of analysis were dissertations defended in Brazilian stricto sensu graduate programs in Administration. The identification of cognitive interests in the dissertations was based on sociological approaches classified by the circle of epistemic matrices, which encompasses pure sociological approaches and sets of overlapping closed curves, forming hybrid sociological approaches. The latent and clear content of sociological approaches were collected and analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti 7. We conclude that the technical and practical interests guide the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations – putting aside the emancipatory interest in our discussions. We also conclude that, in order to make contributions for the advancement of knowledge, our study must go beyond the aggregation of cognitive interests; it is necessary to investigate the postulates of sociological approaches to which the interests are connected.","PeriodicalId":53951,"journal":{"name":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","volume":"21 1","pages":"255-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our critical epistemic review examines how researchers deal with the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations from the standpoint of cognitive interests. We adopted the epistemic matrices’ analytical model elaborated by Paes de Paula (2016), who handles the creation of knowledge based on cognitive interests and epistemic reconstruction, as an alternative to the paradigms of Burrel and Morgan (1979). The object of analysis were dissertations defended in Brazilian stricto sensu graduate programs in Administration. The identification of cognitive interests in the dissertations was based on sociological approaches classified by the circle of epistemic matrices, which encompasses pure sociological approaches and sets of overlapping closed curves, forming hybrid sociological approaches. The latent and clear content of sociological approaches were collected and analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti 7. We conclude that the technical and practical interests guide the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations – putting aside the emancipatory interest in our discussions. We also conclude that, in order to make contributions for the advancement of knowledge, our study must go beyond the aggregation of cognitive interests; it is necessary to investigate the postulates of sociological approaches to which the interests are connected.
我们的批判性认识论综述从认知兴趣的角度考察了研究人员如何处理组织中学习知识的创造。我们采用了Paes de Paula(2016)阐述的认知矩阵分析模型,作为Burrel和Morgan(1979)范式的替代方案,Paes de Bola处理基于认知兴趣和认知重建的知识创造。分析的对象是巴西严格意义上的行政学研究生课程中的论文答辩。学位论文中对认知兴趣的识别是基于按认识矩阵圈分类的社会学方法,该方法包括纯社会学方法和重叠的闭合曲线集,形成了混合社会学方法。使用定性数据分析软件Atlas.ti 7收集并分析了社会学方法的潜在和明确内容。我们得出的结论是,技术和实践利益指导了组织中学习知识的创造——在我们的讨论中抛开解放利益。我们还得出结论,为了为知识的进步做出贡献,我们的研究必须超越认知兴趣的聚合;有必要研究与利益相关的社会学方法的假设。