Analytical Study of Survey Results of Chemical Safety and Security Curriculum in Iraqi Academic Institutions

Emad A Yousif
{"title":"Analytical Study of Survey Results of Chemical Safety and Security Curriculum in Iraqi Academic Institutions","authors":"Emad A Yousif","doi":"10.26740/ujced.v12n2.p148-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The survey presents a general view of the reality of chemical safety and security in educational institutions in Iraq, in which about 301 university staff from 14 Iraqi universities includes a doctorate, master's and bachelor's degree with a postgraduate student presented their opinions regarding the survey sections. This included basic information related to security and safety curricula and their teaching to students of primary and higher studies in Iraqi universities and ways of communication between universities to improve the reality of teaching and training. These institutions possess a culture of safety and optimal training methods for trainers and students. The opinions of the residents varied, which indicates the disparity of university institutions in terms of performance and infrastructure to improve the reality of security and safety in their institutions. Among the observations, the survey adopted the terms “yes” and “no” to describe the situation, and this assessment is considered relative and inaccurate. For example, if we take the question, does your institution implement security standards and safety measures? The answer will be 90% yes, with a large discrepancy between these institutions in the fact that they possess these standards. However, it requires more accurate details in describing the required cases in the survey. We suggest that the Ministry of Higher Education’s decision-makers take the results of the survey into account to develop future plans and improve the reality of security and safety. Furthermore, it is required to address the negatives and enable universities to communicate with each other to exchange experiences. It is important to take into account the adoption of the principle of transparency in the dissemination of data that would enhance aspects of education and knowledge in educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":31518,"journal":{"name":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v12n2.p148-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The survey presents a general view of the reality of chemical safety and security in educational institutions in Iraq, in which about 301 university staff from 14 Iraqi universities includes a doctorate, master's and bachelor's degree with a postgraduate student presented their opinions regarding the survey sections. This included basic information related to security and safety curricula and their teaching to students of primary and higher studies in Iraqi universities and ways of communication between universities to improve the reality of teaching and training. These institutions possess a culture of safety and optimal training methods for trainers and students. The opinions of the residents varied, which indicates the disparity of university institutions in terms of performance and infrastructure to improve the reality of security and safety in their institutions. Among the observations, the survey adopted the terms “yes” and “no” to describe the situation, and this assessment is considered relative and inaccurate. For example, if we take the question, does your institution implement security standards and safety measures? The answer will be 90% yes, with a large discrepancy between these institutions in the fact that they possess these standards. However, it requires more accurate details in describing the required cases in the survey. We suggest that the Ministry of Higher Education’s decision-makers take the results of the survey into account to develop future plans and improve the reality of security and safety. Furthermore, it is required to address the negatives and enable universities to communicate with each other to exchange experiences. It is important to take into account the adoption of the principle of transparency in the dissemination of data that would enhance aspects of education and knowledge in educational institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克高校化学安全与保安课程调查结果分析研究
该调查对伊拉克教育机构的化学安全和安保现状进行了总体了解,来自14所伊拉克大学的约301名大学工作人员(包括博士、硕士和学士学位)和一名研究生就调查部分发表了意见。其中包括与伊拉克大学的安保和安全课程及其对中小学生的教学有关的基本信息,以及大学之间为改善教学和培训的现实而进行沟通的方式。这些机构拥有一种安全文化,并为培训师和学生提供最佳培训方法。居民的意见各不相同,这表明大学机构在绩效和基础设施方面存在差距,以改善其机构的安全保障。在观察结果中,调查采用了“是”和“否”来描述情况,这种评估被认为是相对的和不准确的。例如,如果我们回答这个问题,贵机构是否执行安全标准和安全措施?答案是90%是肯定的,但这些机构在拥有这些标准方面存在很大差异。然而,在描述调查中所需的案例时,它需要更准确的细节。我们建议高等教育部的决策者考虑调查结果,制定未来计划,改善安全保障的现实。此外,还需要解决消极因素,使大学能够相互交流,交流经验。重要的是要考虑到在传播数据时采用透明原则,这将加强教育机构的教育和知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
PENGEMBANGAN LKPD BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIF PADA MATERI KESETIMBANGAN KIMIA PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK MELALUI METODE PRAKTIKUM PADA MATERI TITRASI ASAM-BASA PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING PADA MATERI LAJU REAKSI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMK ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION ABILITIES OF MALE AND FEMALE GRADE STUDENT AT SMAN 1 TANJUNGANOM IN ACID-BASE MATERIAL EFFECT THE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING MODEL ON ABILITY MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS OF XI-GRADE STUDENTS ON ACID-BASED TOPIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1