Embracing the Promise and Potential of Preschool-Age Black Boys: Strength-Based Opportunities for Early Childhood School Psychologists

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences School Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI:10.1080/2372966X.2021.1977586
Kizzy Albritton, Rachel Stein, Kenia Cruz
{"title":"Embracing the Promise and Potential of Preschool-Age Black Boys: Strength-Based Opportunities for Early Childhood School Psychologists","authors":"Kizzy Albritton, Rachel Stein, Kenia Cruz","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2021.1977586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although extensive research illustrates the numerous benefits associated with attending a high-quality early childhood education program, preschool-age Black boys are not equitable beneficiaries of the academic, social–emotional, and behavioral supports provided in high-quality early childhood settings. Young Black boys in early childhood education programs face a variety of challenges that have significant, negative consequences for their foundational experiences. Overcoming these challenges and improving the educational outcomes of young Black boys requires not only a comprehensive examination of the complex issues impacting them but also requires the implementation of strength-based recommendations that will ultimately improve their short-term and long-term educational experiences. This paper offers a critical discussion of the systems and factors that fail to honor Black boys’ strengths as well as specific recommendations for early childhood school psychologists seeking to improve young Black boys’ lives. Impact Statement Early childhood education programs are designed to equip young children with the academic and prosocial skills needed to be successful upon entry into formal school settings (i.e., kindergarten); however, preschool-age Black boys continue to face significant structural and systemic challenges. Early childhood school psychologists are strongly encouraged to address these challenges by adopting and implementing the strength-based recommendations put forth in this paper.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"343 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1977586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Although extensive research illustrates the numerous benefits associated with attending a high-quality early childhood education program, preschool-age Black boys are not equitable beneficiaries of the academic, social–emotional, and behavioral supports provided in high-quality early childhood settings. Young Black boys in early childhood education programs face a variety of challenges that have significant, negative consequences for their foundational experiences. Overcoming these challenges and improving the educational outcomes of young Black boys requires not only a comprehensive examination of the complex issues impacting them but also requires the implementation of strength-based recommendations that will ultimately improve their short-term and long-term educational experiences. This paper offers a critical discussion of the systems and factors that fail to honor Black boys’ strengths as well as specific recommendations for early childhood school psychologists seeking to improve young Black boys’ lives. Impact Statement Early childhood education programs are designed to equip young children with the academic and prosocial skills needed to be successful upon entry into formal school settings (i.e., kindergarten); however, preschool-age Black boys continue to face significant structural and systemic challenges. Early childhood school psychologists are strongly encouraged to address these challenges by adopting and implementing the strength-based recommendations put forth in this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥抱学龄前黑人男孩的希望和潜力:幼儿学校心理学家基于力量的机会
摘要尽管广泛的研究表明,参加高质量的幼儿教育计划有许多好处,但学龄前黑人男孩并不是高质量幼儿环境中提供的学术、社会、情感和行为支持的公平受益者。幼儿教育项目中的年轻黑人男孩面临着各种挑战,这些挑战对他们的基本经历产生了重大的负面影响。克服这些挑战并改善年轻黑人男孩的教育成果,不仅需要全面审查影响他们的复杂问题,还需要实施基于实力的建议,最终改善他们的短期和长期教育体验。本文对未能尊重黑人男孩优势的系统和因素进行了批判性讨论,并为寻求改善年轻黑人男孩生活的幼儿学校心理学家提出了具体建议。影响声明幼儿教育计划旨在使幼儿具备进入正规学校(即幼儿园)后取得成功所需的学术和亲社会技能;然而,学龄前黑人男孩继续面临重大的结构性和系统性挑战。强烈鼓励幼儿学校心理学家通过采纳和实施本文提出的基于力量的建议来应对这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Interaction Between Text Characteristics, Order and Time of Assessment on Bilingual Student Reading Efficiency in Spanish and in English Wellness as an Ethical Mandate: Examining the Mental Health, Stress, and Self-Care Practices of School Psychology Graduate Students Recruitment and Retention Strategies to Diversify School Psychology Graduate Programs: A Systematic Review The Role of Writing Enablers on Writing Proficiency among Hispanic Students Promoting Positive School Climate Among Newcomer Immigrant Adolescents: A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1