On the Nexus Between CSR Practices, ESG Performance, and Asymmetric information

Berto Usman, O. Bernardes, P. Kananlua
{"title":"On the Nexus Between CSR Practices, ESG Performance, and Asymmetric information","authors":"Berto Usman, O. Bernardes, P. Kananlua","doi":"10.22146/gamaijb.54053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to test the relationship of CSR practice­–asymmetry information and ESG performance–asymmetry information. We conjecture that there might be a particular role where the disclosure of non-financial information is deemed useful in truncating the level of asymmetry information. Using the data from two different countries, Indonesia (Asia) and Portugal (Europe), we extracted 37 companies with time period of observation ranges from 2012 to 2016. To manifest the empirical test, we use CSR report (CSR_Rep), CSR committee (CSR_com), CSR assurance (CSR_ass) and GRI adoption as the proxies of CSR practice, while the proxies of ESG performance are represented by Environmental (ENVscr), Social (SOCscr), and Governance (GOVscr) pillar scores as obtained from Thomson Reuters ASSET4 database. Bid-ask spread is used as the surrogate indicator of asymmetry information. The empirical test reveals that only variable GRI and SOCscr show negative and significant association with bid-ask spread. Whilst, the remaining variables of CSR practice (CSR_rep, CSR_com, CSR_ass), and ESG performance (ENVscr and GOVscr) are negatively associated with asymmetry information (Spread) but statistically insignificant. Our results suggest that CSR practice and ESG performance are weakly associated with asymmetry information, in which most of CSR practices and ESG performance need a time lag to allow them to be value relevant information in mitigating the level of asymmetry information.","PeriodicalId":54086,"journal":{"name":"Gadjah Mada international journal of business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gadjah Mada international journal of business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.54053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to test the relationship of CSR practice­–asymmetry information and ESG performance–asymmetry information. We conjecture that there might be a particular role where the disclosure of non-financial information is deemed useful in truncating the level of asymmetry information. Using the data from two different countries, Indonesia (Asia) and Portugal (Europe), we extracted 37 companies with time period of observation ranges from 2012 to 2016. To manifest the empirical test, we use CSR report (CSR_Rep), CSR committee (CSR_com), CSR assurance (CSR_ass) and GRI adoption as the proxies of CSR practice, while the proxies of ESG performance are represented by Environmental (ENVscr), Social (SOCscr), and Governance (GOVscr) pillar scores as obtained from Thomson Reuters ASSET4 database. Bid-ask spread is used as the surrogate indicator of asymmetry information. The empirical test reveals that only variable GRI and SOCscr show negative and significant association with bid-ask spread. Whilst, the remaining variables of CSR practice (CSR_rep, CSR_com, CSR_ass), and ESG performance (ENVscr and GOVscr) are negatively associated with asymmetry information (Spread) but statistically insignificant. Our results suggest that CSR practice and ESG performance are weakly associated with asymmetry information, in which most of CSR practices and ESG performance need a time lag to allow them to be value relevant information in mitigating the level of asymmetry information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会责任实践、ESG绩效和信息不对称之间的关系
本文旨在检验企业社会责任实践——信息不对称与ESG绩效——信息不对称之间的关系。我们推测,可能有一个特殊的作用,其中非财务信息的披露被认为是有用的截断不对称信息的水平。使用来自印度尼西亚(亚洲)和葡萄牙(欧洲)两个不同国家的数据,我们提取了37家公司,其观察时间段为2012年至2016年。为了体现实证检验,我们使用CSR报告(CSR_Rep)、CSR委员会(CSR_com)、CSR保证(CSR_ass)和GRI采用作为CSR实践的代理,而ESG绩效的代理则由Thomson Reuters ASSET4数据库中获取的环境(ENVscr)、社会(SOCscr)和治理(GOVscr)支柱得分表示。买卖价差被用作信息不对称的替代指标。实证检验表明,只有变量GRI和SOCscr与买卖价差呈显著负相关。而企业社会责任实践的其余变量(CSR_rep、CSR_com、CSR_ass)和ESG绩效(ENVscr和GOVscr)与信息不对称(Spread)呈负相关,但统计上不显著。我们的研究结果表明,企业社会责任实践和ESG绩效与不对称信息的相关性较弱,其中大多数企业社会责任实践和ESG绩效需要一个时间滞后,以使它们成为减轻不对称信息水平的价值相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: An objective of the Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business (GamaIJB) is to promote the wide dissemination of the results of systematic scholarly inquiries into the broad field of business research. The GamaIJB is intended to be the journal for publishing articles reporting the results of research on business. The GamaIJB invites manuscripts in the areas: Marketing Management, Finance Management, Strategic Management, Operation Management, Human Resource Management, E-business, Knowledge Management, Management Accounting, Management Control System, Management Information System, International Business, Business Economics, Business Ethics and Sustainable, and Entrepreneurship.
期刊最新文献
SMEs fintech financing: does board governance matter? The Role of Trust on the Continuance Usage Intention of Indonesian Mobile Payment Application Examination of Consumers’ Perceived Quality and Willingness to Buy in the Context of Price Variability and Frequency of Price Change: A Study of Retail Products Indonesian Consumer Complaint Behavior Based on Ethnic Groups and Generations Role of Cultural Intelligence and Customer Involvement on Behavioral Loyalty Toward Manufactured Products in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1