Tissue Microarray Detection of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and C-erbB-2 in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and a Preliminary Study on the Molecular Typing of Ovarian Cancer

Jian Wang, Dehua Liu, Yong Liu, Gongliang Zhang, F. Peng, Zhi Wang
{"title":"Tissue Microarray Detection of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and C-erbB-2 in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and a Preliminary Study on the Molecular Typing of Ovarian Cancer","authors":"Jian Wang, Dehua Liu, Yong Liu, Gongliang Zhang, F. Peng, Zhi Wang","doi":"10.1166/NNL.2020.3234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and C-erbB-2 in patients with ovarian cancer using tissue microarrays (TMA) and preliminarily analyzed molecular typing data. Specimens from 119 ovarian cancer patients were collected and were analyzed\n by TMA. The expression of ER, PR, and C-erbB-2 was examined by IHC and the clinicopathological associations were analyzed. The results indicated that higher ER expression was observed in SC and EC, whereas PR exhibited a similar expression pattern, but relatively lower compared with ER expression.\n Conversely, very weak expression was observed in CCC and MC, especially for PR (All P <0.05). C-erbB-2 exhibited no expression pattern differences among the different histological types (All P >0.05), but exhibited higher positive expression in FIGO III and IV stages, whereas\n there was no difference in ER and PR expression among the different stages. Higher PR expression was observed in middle and highly differentiated tumors, whereas higher C-erbB-2 expression was associated with low degree of differentiation (P <0.05). Patients with ER (+) PR (+) C-erbB-2\n (?) had a better prognosis and patients with ER (?) PR (?) C-erbB-2 (+) had the worst prognosis. In conclusion, ER and PR tend to be highly expressed in less malignant ovarian cancer subtypes such as SC and EC. Ovarian cancer patients with ER/PR double-positive and C-erbB-2 negative expression\n patterns survive longer.","PeriodicalId":18871,"journal":{"name":"Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters","volume":"12 1","pages":"1159-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/NNL.2020.3234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and C-erbB-2 in patients with ovarian cancer using tissue microarrays (TMA) and preliminarily analyzed molecular typing data. Specimens from 119 ovarian cancer patients were collected and were analyzed by TMA. The expression of ER, PR, and C-erbB-2 was examined by IHC and the clinicopathological associations were analyzed. The results indicated that higher ER expression was observed in SC and EC, whereas PR exhibited a similar expression pattern, but relatively lower compared with ER expression. Conversely, very weak expression was observed in CCC and MC, especially for PR (All P <0.05). C-erbB-2 exhibited no expression pattern differences among the different histological types (All P >0.05), but exhibited higher positive expression in FIGO III and IV stages, whereas there was no difference in ER and PR expression among the different stages. Higher PR expression was observed in middle and highly differentiated tumors, whereas higher C-erbB-2 expression was associated with low degree of differentiation (P <0.05). Patients with ER (+) PR (+) C-erbB-2 (?) had a better prognosis and patients with ER (?) PR (?) C-erbB-2 (+) had the worst prognosis. In conclusion, ER and PR tend to be highly expressed in less malignant ovarian cancer subtypes such as SC and EC. Ovarian cancer patients with ER/PR double-positive and C-erbB-2 negative expression patterns survive longer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织芯片检测卵巢癌患者雌激素受体、孕激素受体和C-erbB-2及卵巢癌分子分型的初步研究
我们利用组织微阵列技术(TMA)评估卵巢癌患者雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和C-erbB-2的表达,并初步分析分子分型数据。本文收集119例卵巢癌患者标本,采用TMA对标本进行分析。免疫组化法检测ER、PR、C-erbB-2的表达,并分析其与临床病理的关系。结果表明,SC和EC中ER表达量较高,PR表达量与SC和EC相似,但ER表达量相对较低。相反,在CCC和MC中表达极弱,尤其是PR(均P < 0.05),但在FIGO III和IV期表达较高,而ER和PR在不同时期的表达无差异。中、高分化肿瘤中PR表达较高,低分化肿瘤中C-erbB-2表达较高(P <0.05)。ER (+) PR (+) C-erbB-2(?)患者预后较ER(?)患者好。公关(?)C-erbB-2(+)预后最差。综上所述,在恶性程度较低的卵巢癌亚型如SC和EC中,ER和PR倾向于高表达。ER/PR双阳性和C-erbB-2阴性表达的卵巢癌患者存活时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊最新文献
Identification of Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer Nanocomposite Detection of Elemental Impurities and Process Correlation Analysis of Ceftriaxone Sodium for Injection Astragalus Polysaccharide Nano-Liposomes Modulate the Inflammatory Response and Oxidative Stress in Stroke-Associated Pneumonia by Increasing OIP5-AS1 to Regulate the miR-128-3p/SIRT1 Pathway miR-199a-3p Inhibitor Delivered Through Nano-Drug Delivery Systems Suppresses Tumor Cell Survival and Metastasis Construction of Functional Renal Targeting Nano Drug Liposome and Its Effect on Lupus Nephritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1