Developing school leading guidelines facilitating a whole school approach to education for sustainable development

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Environmental Education Research Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1080/13504622.2022.2151980
Anette Forssten Seiser, Anna Mogren, N. Gericke, Teresa Berglund, Daniel Olsson
{"title":"Developing school leading guidelines facilitating a whole school approach to education for sustainable development","authors":"Anette Forssten Seiser, Anna Mogren, N. Gericke, Teresa Berglund, Daniel Olsson","doi":"10.1080/13504622.2022.2151980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored the function of school leading in the implementation process of education for sustainable development (ESD) in five Swedish schools employing a whole school approach (WSA). A follow-up study design was used, in which schools that had initiated an ESD project in 2016 were subsequently visited twice for interviews with principals during the project and after it was finalized. The theory of practice architectures in combination with the concept of school improvement capacity was used as the theoretical framework in the analysis. The study showed how school leading should be about enhancing the local school’s capacity to improve. It also showed how specific practice architectures prefigured a WSA to ESD and how school leading in this context was about arranging—or orchestrating—practice architectures in ways that enabled such an approach. The issues of time and endurance were pivotal. Based on the empirical results from this study and school improvement theory, guidelines were developed that can be used to drive a WSA to ESD process forward through three different school improvement phases: initiation, implementation, and institutionalization. The limitations and suggestions for further research are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":11734,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Education Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"783 - 805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2151980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the function of school leading in the implementation process of education for sustainable development (ESD) in five Swedish schools employing a whole school approach (WSA). A follow-up study design was used, in which schools that had initiated an ESD project in 2016 were subsequently visited twice for interviews with principals during the project and after it was finalized. The theory of practice architectures in combination with the concept of school improvement capacity was used as the theoretical framework in the analysis. The study showed how school leading should be about enhancing the local school’s capacity to improve. It also showed how specific practice architectures prefigured a WSA to ESD and how school leading in this context was about arranging—or orchestrating—practice architectures in ways that enabled such an approach. The issues of time and endurance were pivotal. Based on the empirical results from this study and school improvement theory, guidelines were developed that can be used to drive a WSA to ESD process forward through three different school improvement phases: initiation, implementation, and institutionalization. The limitations and suggestions for further research are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定学校主导的指导方针,促进以学校整体方式进行可持续发展教育
摘要本研究探讨了学校领导在瑞典五所学校实施可持续发展教育(ESD)过程中的作用。采用了一项后续研究设计,在该设计中,2016年启动可持续发展教育项目的学校随后在项目期间和项目完成后两次访问,与校长进行面谈。实践架构理论与学校提升能力的概念相结合,作为分析的理论框架。这项研究表明,学校领导应该如何提高当地学校的改进能力。它还展示了具体的实践架构如何预示着可持续发展教育的WSA,以及在这种情况下,学校领导如何以能够实现这种方法的方式安排或编排实践架构。时间和耐力问题至关重要。基于这项研究的实证结果和学校改进理论,制定了指导方针,可用于通过三个不同的学校改进阶段推动WSA到ESD的过程:启动、实施和制度化。还讨论了进一步研究的局限性和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
21.90%
发文量
141
期刊最新文献
Fostering environmental personal norms: the role of environmental education in Nigerian pre-service teachers’ environmental knowledge, pro-environmental beliefs and behaviours Knowledge, urgency and agency: reflections on climate change education course outcomes Climate change and education in shades of blue: between darkness and light with agential realism and object-oriented ontology Framing engagement and public participation in local climate conferences Does environmental education work differently across sociopolitical contexts in the United States? Part II. Examining pedagogy in school field trip programs for early adolescent youth across political contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1