{"title":"Common Waters: Japan, South Korea, and Maritime Security Assistance in Southeast Asia","authors":"Ryan Ashley, Jada Fraser","doi":"10.1353/asp.2023.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"executive summary:This article proposes that Southeast Asia is an ideal space for cooperation between Japan and South Korea, given that both countries share strategic priorities in the region.main argumentAlthough Japan and South Korea's bilateral ties are typically defined by long-standing issues over historical issues and territorial disputes, each country shares a wide set of geopolitical interests, leading to an \"Asian paradox\" of mismatched priorities. This paradox is clearly visible in Southeast Asia. While Tokyo's strategic ties with the subregion, often via the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), are deeper and predate Seoul's, South Korea is increasingly expanding its own relations with the region alongside its growing security outreach across the Asia-Pacific. As a result, Japan's and South Korea's interests and activities are meeting in strategic spaces in Southeast Asia, such as the South China Sea and the Mekong River basin. Despite sharing common goals in these spaces, so far Seoul and Tokyo have not collaborated in their efforts. While many hurdles still limit direct security cooperation between Japan and South Korea, even indirect cooperation in shared strategic spaces in Southeast Asia could provide both countries an opportunity to build trust and provide security benefits to countries in Southeast Asia.policy implications• The U.S. can incentivize Japan–South Korea cooperation in Southeast Asia through the Quad Plus framework.• Expanding the General Security of Military Information Agreement between Japan and South Korea could be a method of increasing their cooperation in Southeast Asia.• To achieve greater cooperation toward these aims, the U.S. should support strategic latitude for Japan and South Korea in Southeast Asia.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":"30 1","pages":"101 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
executive summary:This article proposes that Southeast Asia is an ideal space for cooperation between Japan and South Korea, given that both countries share strategic priorities in the region.main argumentAlthough Japan and South Korea's bilateral ties are typically defined by long-standing issues over historical issues and territorial disputes, each country shares a wide set of geopolitical interests, leading to an "Asian paradox" of mismatched priorities. This paradox is clearly visible in Southeast Asia. While Tokyo's strategic ties with the subregion, often via the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), are deeper and predate Seoul's, South Korea is increasingly expanding its own relations with the region alongside its growing security outreach across the Asia-Pacific. As a result, Japan's and South Korea's interests and activities are meeting in strategic spaces in Southeast Asia, such as the South China Sea and the Mekong River basin. Despite sharing common goals in these spaces, so far Seoul and Tokyo have not collaborated in their efforts. While many hurdles still limit direct security cooperation between Japan and South Korea, even indirect cooperation in shared strategic spaces in Southeast Asia could provide both countries an opportunity to build trust and provide security benefits to countries in Southeast Asia.policy implications• The U.S. can incentivize Japan–South Korea cooperation in Southeast Asia through the Quad Plus framework.• Expanding the General Security of Military Information Agreement between Japan and South Korea could be a method of increasing their cooperation in Southeast Asia.• To achieve greater cooperation toward these aims, the U.S. should support strategic latitude for Japan and South Korea in Southeast Asia.
摘要:本文认为东南亚是日韩两国合作的理想空间,因为两国在该地区有着共同的战略重点。虽然日本和韩国的双边关系通常是由历史问题和领土争端等长期问题决定的,但两国都有广泛的地缘政治利益,这导致了优先事项不匹配的“亚洲悖论”。这种矛盾在东南亚尤为明显。虽然东京通常通过东南亚国家联盟(Association of Southeast Asian Nations,简称东盟)与该地区的战略关系更为深厚,而且早于韩国,但韩国也在不断扩大自己与该地区的关系,同时在整个亚太地区不断扩大安全触角。因此,日本和韩国的利益和活动在东南亚的战略空间相遇,比如南中国海和湄公河流域。尽管在这些空间中有共同的目标,但到目前为止,首尔和东京还没有合作。虽然日本和韩国之间的直接安全合作仍然受到许多障碍的限制,但即使是在东南亚共享战略空间的间接合作也可以为两国提供建立信任和为东南亚国家提供安全利益的机会。•美国可以通过“四国+”框架激励日韩在东南亚的合作。•扩大日本和韩国之间的《军事信息安全总协定》(General Security of Military Information Agreement),可能是加强两国在东南亚合作的一种方法。•为了在这些目标上实现更大的合作,美国应该支持日本和韩国在东南亚的战略纬度。
期刊介绍:
Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.