Comprehensive Literacy Instruction within Classroom Contexts: Teachers’ Perceptions of Best Practices for Literacy

Jennifer Manak, Chelsey M. Bahlmann Bollinger, Courtney Shimek, Jennifer Barrett-Tatum, Debra Wellman
{"title":"Comprehensive Literacy Instruction within Classroom Contexts: Teachers’ Perceptions of Best Practices for Literacy","authors":"Jennifer Manak, Chelsey M. Bahlmann Bollinger, Courtney Shimek, Jennifer Barrett-Tatum, Debra Wellman","doi":"10.14507/cie.vol23iss2.2029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study illuminates the voices of literacy teachers. Findings from this study were based on a questionnaire about what teachers perceive as best practices in literacy instruction. We received 44 fully completed questionnaires. The 44 teacher respondents ranged from Pre-K through 6th grade with experience ranging from 1 to 20+ years of teaching. Teachers came from rural, suburban, and urban schools, with 40% of these teachers in Title I schools. More than 130 best practices in literacy instruction were identified by our teacher participants. Teachers’ responses illustrated many of the components of comprehensive literacy instruction that covered a broad array of practices from the initiation of instruction through the assessment of student learning. Literacy teachers’ responses were organized into three themes: Preparing for Instruction, Literacy Instruction, and Student Assessment and Differentiation.","PeriodicalId":90480,"journal":{"name":"Current issues in education (Tempe, Ariz.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current issues in education (Tempe, Ariz.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14507/cie.vol23iss2.2029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study illuminates the voices of literacy teachers. Findings from this study were based on a questionnaire about what teachers perceive as best practices in literacy instruction. We received 44 fully completed questionnaires. The 44 teacher respondents ranged from Pre-K through 6th grade with experience ranging from 1 to 20+ years of teaching. Teachers came from rural, suburban, and urban schools, with 40% of these teachers in Title I schools. More than 130 best practices in literacy instruction were identified by our teacher participants. Teachers’ responses illustrated many of the components of comprehensive literacy instruction that covered a broad array of practices from the initiation of instruction through the assessment of student learning. Literacy teachers’ responses were organized into three themes: Preparing for Instruction, Literacy Instruction, and Student Assessment and Differentiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课堂环境中的综合识字教学:教师对识字最佳实践的看法
这项研究阐明了识字教师的声音。这项研究的结果是基于一份关于教师认为识字教学最佳实践的问卷。我们收到了44份完整的问卷。44名教师受访者的年龄从学前到六年级,教学经验从1年到20多年不等。教师来自农村、郊区和城市学校,其中40%的教师在一级学校。我们的教师参与者确定了130多个扫盲教学的最佳实践。教师的回答说明了全面识字教学的许多组成部分,涵盖了从开始教学到评估学生学习的广泛实践。扫盲教师的回答分为三个主题:为教学做准备、扫盲教学以及学生评估和差异化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Canada’s Student Journal Forum: From Humble Beginnings to National Conference Improving Student Journal Visibility via the Directory of Open Access Journals Two Undergraduate Students’ Journal Reviewing Experiences Student-Led Undergraduate Journals: A Catalyst for Comprehensive Research Experience and Professional Growth Not “Just” an Undergrad: Undergraduate Journals as a Portal to Participating in Academic Discourse Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1