Pancreas transplantation from donors after cardiac death – The US experience

Abstract

Introduction

Since the beginning of pancreas transplantation, the rate of donation after cardiac (or circulatory) death (DCD) accounts for only 3% of all transplants in the US. This is the result of perceived higher complication rates and overall worse outcome with DCD donors. Such misconceptions and an increased demand for deceased donor (DD) organs warrant a systematic review of the use of DCD compared with donation after brain death (DBD) pancreata to objectively assess DCD outcome after pancreas transplantation in the US.

Methods

All 22,160 DD pancreas transplants performed in diabetic patients between 1/1/2001 and 12/31/2020 were included in this analysis. To assess changes in outcomes, patient and graft survival was computed using the Kaplan-Meier method in 5-year intervals. Comprehensive univariate and multivariable comparisons of posttransplant complications and patient and pancreas and kidney graft survival between DCD and DBD pancreas transplants were performed to assess the donor impact.

Results

In the US over the past 20 years most DCD donors were used for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants and less often for solitary pancreas transplants. DCD transplants never accounted for more than 4% per year of all pancreas transplants. A comparison of the pancreas donor risk index (pDRI) between DCD and DBD pancreata showed that the only distinguishing factor was DCD donation. SPK patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival for DCD donors did not change significantly over time. One- and 3 -year DCD patient survival reached 96% and 93%, pancreas graft survival 90% and 84%, and kidney graft survival 96% and 91%, respectively. For the last decade, no differences in patient and graft survival between DCD and DBD donors were detected (P > 0.67). The relative risk for the use of a DCD donor was not increased (P > 0.6). Influential risk factors were older donor and recipient age as well as longer preservation times. Larger transplant center accepted DCD donors more frequently and showed better outcome. While the rate of early pancreas complications was the same for DCD vs. DBD transplants, delayed kidney graft function was significantly higher in DCD kidneys secondary to more long-distance shipping across the country. The multivariable analysis showed a 4-times higher rate in delayed graft function. Longer cold preservation time and older donor age further increased the risk of graft failure. The use of machine perfusion of the kidney graft reduced the relative risk of delayed graft function by 50%.

Summary

The use of DCD donor organs in pancreas transplantation is not associated with higher failure or complication rates in the US. A pancreas offer from a DCD donor should not be the sole reason to decline the organ for transplantation. Careful selection of specific donor and recipient factors, as well as advanced preservation techniques are essential for good outcome.