Closing the Adaptation Gap in Mountains

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mountain Research and Development Pub Date : 2021-10-14 DOI:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00033.1
G. McDowell, Madison E. Stevens, A. Lesnikowski, C. Huggel, A. Harden, J. DiBella, M. Morecroft, Praveen Kumar, E. Joe, I. Bhatt
{"title":"Closing the Adaptation Gap in Mountains","authors":"G. McDowell, Madison E. Stevens, A. Lesnikowski, C. Huggel, A. Harden, J. DiBella, M. Morecroft, Praveen Kumar, E. Joe, I. Bhatt","doi":"10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00033.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 1 billion people are living at the frontlines of climate change in mountain areas, where warming rates outpace the global average and are driving significant changes in environments and ecosystem services. These changes are exacerbating socioeconomic difficulties faced by many mountain communities, and are already intensifying vulnerabilities across mountain areas globally. The situation is indicative of pervasive and consequential deficits in adaptation, and calls attention to the need for a better understanding of existing adaptation efforts, as well as the prospects for increasing the quantity and quality of adaptation action in mountain regions. In response, this MountainAgenda article introduces a conceptual framework for adaptation gaps. It then uses data from 2 major global-scale adaptation reviews to shed light on the nature and true magnitude of the adaptation gap in mountains. It reveals shortcomings in available adaptation options, deficits in the uptake of existing adaptation support, and a general lack of coherence between existing adaptations and keystone global agreements relevant to climate change adaptation. These shortcomings are largely related to soft limits to adaptation that constrain responses across mountain areas. In this article, we provide recommendations for closing the adaptation gap in mountains and suggest that this will require deeply collaborative efforts that are rooted in local needs, aspirations, and ways of knowing, but that are also supported by external capacity building and implementation resources. In many instances, this will resemble a transformative approach to adaptation. The conceptual framework presented here is broadly applicable and can also be utilized to identify and close adaptation gaps in social-ecological contexts beyond mountains.","PeriodicalId":49793,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00033.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Over 1 billion people are living at the frontlines of climate change in mountain areas, where warming rates outpace the global average and are driving significant changes in environments and ecosystem services. These changes are exacerbating socioeconomic difficulties faced by many mountain communities, and are already intensifying vulnerabilities across mountain areas globally. The situation is indicative of pervasive and consequential deficits in adaptation, and calls attention to the need for a better understanding of existing adaptation efforts, as well as the prospects for increasing the quantity and quality of adaptation action in mountain regions. In response, this MountainAgenda article introduces a conceptual framework for adaptation gaps. It then uses data from 2 major global-scale adaptation reviews to shed light on the nature and true magnitude of the adaptation gap in mountains. It reveals shortcomings in available adaptation options, deficits in the uptake of existing adaptation support, and a general lack of coherence between existing adaptations and keystone global agreements relevant to climate change adaptation. These shortcomings are largely related to soft limits to adaptation that constrain responses across mountain areas. In this article, we provide recommendations for closing the adaptation gap in mountains and suggest that this will require deeply collaborative efforts that are rooted in local needs, aspirations, and ways of knowing, but that are also supported by external capacity building and implementation resources. In many instances, this will resemble a transformative approach to adaptation. The conceptual framework presented here is broadly applicable and can also be utilized to identify and close adaptation gaps in social-ecological contexts beyond mountains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小山区适应差距
超过10亿人生活在山区气候变化的前线,那里的变暖速度超过了全球平均水平,正在推动环境和生态系统服务的重大变化。这些变化加剧了许多山区社区面临的社会经济困难,并已经加剧了全球山区的脆弱性。这种情况表明适应方面普遍存在相应的不足,并提请注意需要更好地了解现有的适应努力,以及增加山区适应行动的数量和质量的前景。作为回应,《山区议程》的这篇文章介绍了适应差距的概念框架。然后,它使用来自两次主要的全球范围适应审查的数据来阐明山区适应差距的性质和真实程度。它揭示了现有适应选择方面的不足,缺乏对现有适应支持的吸收,以及现有适应与气候变化适应相关的关键全球协议之间普遍缺乏一致性。这些缺点在很大程度上与适应的软限制有关,这些软限制限制了山区的应对措施。在这篇文章中,我们提出了缩小山区适应差距的建议,并表示这将需要深入的合作努力,这些努力植根于当地的需求、愿望和了解方式,但也得到外部能力建设和实施资源的支持。在许多情况下,这将类似于一种变革性的适应方法。这里提出的概念框架具有广泛的适用性,也可用于确定和缩小山区以外社会生态环境中的适应差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mountain Research and Development
Mountain Research and Development 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
18.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: MRD features three peer-reviewed sections: MountainDevelopment, which contains “Transformation Knowledge,” MountainResearch, which contains “Systems Knowledge,” and MountainAgenda, which contains “Target Knowledge.” In addition, the MountainPlatform section offers International Mountain Society members an opportunity to convey information about their mountain initiatives and priorities; and the MountainMedia section presents reviews of recent publications on mountains and mountain development. Key research and development fields: -Society and culture- Policy, politics, and institutions- Economy- Bio- and geophysical environment- Ecosystems and cycles- Environmental risks- Resource and land use- Energy, infrastructure, and services- Methods and theories- Regions
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Climate Change Adaptation Practices in Conflict-Affected Mountain Areas of Africa Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services Potential in River Catchments in the Caucasus: Evidence From Dilijan National Park, Armenia A Landscape's Social and Ecological Services are Equally Valued by Andean Farmers When Deciding Where to Grow a Crop A European Quality Term for Mountain Wines? An Online Experimental Auction with Italian Consumers Pastoralism in Changthang, Ladakh: Adaptations, Challenges, and Pathways for Sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1