Leveraging environmental stewardship mapping and assessment research as a relational process for ecology with cities

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Frontiers in Sustainable Cities Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.3389/frsc.2023.954870
B. Maharramli, Michele Romolini
{"title":"Leveraging environmental stewardship mapping and assessment research as a relational process for ecology with cities","authors":"B. Maharramli, Michele Romolini","doi":"10.3389/frsc.2023.954870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, scholars, policy makers, and others have put forth that governance and management of urban environments requires a consideration of cities as social-ecological systems, necessitating involvement from a broad range of actors. Yet the research on environmental governance and development of tools to support it is often completed for rather than with those responsible for carrying out the work. We examined a university-led research effort on urban environmental stewardship in Los Angeles (LA), USA. A university urban research center conducted an environmental Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) in Los Angeles County, which draws upon network analysis and GIS to better understand sustainability relationships, opportunities, and gaps. STEW-MAP is intended to be both a research study examining stewardship organizations across sectors, scales, jurisdictions and geographic space, as well as an application providing tools to facilitate collaborative environmental stewardship. We sought to contribute to a better understanding of how the process of STEW-MAP can leverage sustainability for a more relational ecology with cities approach. To evaluate the process of the LA STEW-MAP, we conducted our conceptual analysis of this stewardship tool by examining co-production of knowledge and co-production of place, drawing particularly from workshops with community partners that took place in 2017 and 2018. This article will show that the LA STEW-MAP process can be improved to better operationalize a relational ecology with cities approach. This research contributes to the urban sustainability governance literature by focusing on how the process of the LA STEW-MAP can be a relational model and advance an ecology with cities' approach that captures and leverages multi-scalar interactions.","PeriodicalId":33686,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.954870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasingly, scholars, policy makers, and others have put forth that governance and management of urban environments requires a consideration of cities as social-ecological systems, necessitating involvement from a broad range of actors. Yet the research on environmental governance and development of tools to support it is often completed for rather than with those responsible for carrying out the work. We examined a university-led research effort on urban environmental stewardship in Los Angeles (LA), USA. A university urban research center conducted an environmental Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project (STEW-MAP) in Los Angeles County, which draws upon network analysis and GIS to better understand sustainability relationships, opportunities, and gaps. STEW-MAP is intended to be both a research study examining stewardship organizations across sectors, scales, jurisdictions and geographic space, as well as an application providing tools to facilitate collaborative environmental stewardship. We sought to contribute to a better understanding of how the process of STEW-MAP can leverage sustainability for a more relational ecology with cities approach. To evaluate the process of the LA STEW-MAP, we conducted our conceptual analysis of this stewardship tool by examining co-production of knowledge and co-production of place, drawing particularly from workshops with community partners that took place in 2017 and 2018. This article will show that the LA STEW-MAP process can be improved to better operationalize a relational ecology with cities approach. This research contributes to the urban sustainability governance literature by focusing on how the process of the LA STEW-MAP can be a relational model and advance an ecology with cities' approach that captures and leverages multi-scalar interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用环境管理绘图和评估研究作为生态与城市的关系过程
越来越多的学者、政策制定者和其他人提出,城市环境的治理和管理需要将城市视为社会生态系统,需要广泛的参与者参与。然而,关于环境治理的研究和支持环境治理的工具的开发往往是由负责开展这项工作的人完成的。我们考察了美国洛杉矶大学领导的一项关于城市环境管理的研究。一个大学城市研究中心在洛杉矶县开展了一个环境管理测绘和评估项目(STEW-MAP),该项目利用网络分析和GIS来更好地了解可持续性关系、机会和差距。STEW-MAP旨在既是一项研究跨部门、跨规模、跨司法管辖区和跨地理空间的管理组织的研究,也是一项提供工具以促进合作环境管理的应用程序。我们试图更好地理解STEW-MAP的过程如何利用可持续性,实现与城市更紧密的生态关系。为了评估LA STEW-MAP的过程,我们通过检查知识的共同生产和地点的共同生产,特别是从2017年和2018年与社区合作伙伴举行的研讨会中,对这一管理工具进行了概念分析。这篇文章将表明,可以改进LA STEW-MAP过程,以更好地操作与城市的关系生态学方法。这项研究通过关注LA STEW-MAP的过程如何成为一个关系模型,并通过捕捉和利用多标量相互作用的城市方法推进生态,为城市可持续性治理文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodiversity and quality of urban green landscape affect mental restorativeness of residents in Multan, Pakistan The presence of polluting sites in urban contexts: an analysis of the effects on the dynamics of the residential real estate market The factors that influence the growth and performance of micro and small-scale enterprises in Dessie Town administration Diagnosing the voids of knowledge in the transformation process in managing and standardizing smart city development: the case of the government of Indonesia Do individuals' resist green home investment decisions? An empirical study from status quo bias and inertia perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1