The Statute of Limitation in Case of Customs Criminal Offences in the EU: A Comparative Study

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2023025
Jorge Juan Milla-Ibáñez
{"title":"The Statute of Limitation in Case of Customs Criminal Offences in the EU: A Comparative Study","authors":"Jorge Juan Milla-Ibáñez","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2023025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the uniformed customs legislation in the European Union (EU), the normal statute of limitation for notifying a customs debt is three years. This period can be extended to a period of a minimum of five years and a maximum of ten years if the customs debt is incurred as the result of an act which, at the time it was committed, was liable to engender criminal court proceedings. Understanding the rules about what is considered a criminal court proceeding is thus essential for the extended statute of limitation that applies in case of a post-clearance recovery of customs debt. As EU Member States are competent to decide in their own legislation when an act engenders a criminal court proceeding, the application of the extended statute of limitation may be different between the Member States and cause uncertainty for market operators having customs operations in different EU Member States.\nThis study examines to what extent the differences in application of the extended statute of limitation in case of customs criminal offences in a representative sample of eight Member States (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, and Spain) could hinder the uniform application of customs legislation in the EU Customs Union.\nstatute of limitation, customs debt, post-clearance, criminal offence","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2023025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the uniformed customs legislation in the European Union (EU), the normal statute of limitation for notifying a customs debt is three years. This period can be extended to a period of a minimum of five years and a maximum of ten years if the customs debt is incurred as the result of an act which, at the time it was committed, was liable to engender criminal court proceedings. Understanding the rules about what is considered a criminal court proceeding is thus essential for the extended statute of limitation that applies in case of a post-clearance recovery of customs debt. As EU Member States are competent to decide in their own legislation when an act engenders a criminal court proceeding, the application of the extended statute of limitation may be different between the Member States and cause uncertainty for market operators having customs operations in different EU Member States. This study examines to what extent the differences in application of the extended statute of limitation in case of customs criminal offences in a representative sample of eight Member States (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, and Spain) could hinder the uniform application of customs legislation in the EU Customs Union. statute of limitation, customs debt, post-clearance, criminal offence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟海关刑事犯罪案件的诉讼时效比较研究
根据欧洲联盟统一的海关立法,通知海关债务的正常时效为三年。如果海关债务是由于一项行为而产生的,而该行为在实施时可能引发刑事法庭诉讼,则这一期限可延长至至少五年,最多十年。因此,了解什么是刑事法院程序的规则对于适用于清关后追回海关债务的延长时效至关重要。由于欧盟成员国有权在自己的立法中决定一项行为何时会引发刑事法庭诉讼,因此各成员国对延长时效的适用可能有所不同,并给在不同欧盟成员国开展海关业务的市场运营商带来不确定性。这项研究考察了在八个成员国(比利时、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚和西班牙)的代表性样本中,在海关刑事犯罪案件中适用延长时效的差异在多大程度上会阻碍海关立法在欧盟海关联盟的统一适用,事后清理,刑事犯罪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
The EU 11th and 12th Packages of Sanctions Against Russia: How Far is the EU Willing to Go Extraterritorially? Special Procedures the Responsible Person(s): What Would Change under the EU Commission’s Reform Proposal? Positioning African Maritime Services as Key Enablers of the Emerging Single African Market Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa Navigating Digital Sovereignty: Implications for African Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1