Pia Callesen , Marianne Lunde Pedersen , Charlotte Koch Andersen , Adrian Wells
{"title":"Metacognitive therapy for bipolar II disorder: A single case series study","authors":"Pia Callesen , Marianne Lunde Pedersen , Charlotte Koch Andersen , Adrian Wells","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a severe mental disease with a considerable reduction in life quality and high mortality. Self-management interventions and Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) are the most widely investigated psychological treatments for BD. However, recovery rates are low and only small to moderate effect sizes have been found. Metacognitive therapy is a relatively new treatment for mental disorders based on Wells and Matthews’ transdiagnostic model of emotional disorder – the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>MCT was delivered to three Danes with a diagnosis of BD ascertained using the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM). An A–B design with Multiple baseline measures was conducted and the effects associated with treatment was examined at post-treatment and follow-up and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), rumination time and change in metacognitive beliefs were also assessed using the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome Scale (CAS 1).</p></div><div><h3>Results/conclusion</h3><p>The results demonstrated improvements in depressive symptoms, rumination time and metacognitive beliefs after 7–12 sessions of MCT. Two out of three patients needed 1–3 booster sessions after approximately six months follow-up. However, the effects persisted at 12- months follow-up and all patients were recovered and did not meet the BD diagnosis according to the SCID. Limitations to the findings include the small number of participants and a decreasing baseline score in two of the participants. Nevertheless, it appears that metacognitive therapy is a feasible treatment for BD that might have potential positive effects. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are now needed to investigate this further.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"38 ","pages":"Pages 107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.08.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background
Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a severe mental disease with a considerable reduction in life quality and high mortality. Self-management interventions and Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) are the most widely investigated psychological treatments for BD. However, recovery rates are low and only small to moderate effect sizes have been found. Metacognitive therapy is a relatively new treatment for mental disorders based on Wells and Matthews’ transdiagnostic model of emotional disorder – the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF).
Method
MCT was delivered to three Danes with a diagnosis of BD ascertained using the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM). An A–B design with Multiple baseline measures was conducted and the effects associated with treatment was examined at post-treatment and follow-up and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), rumination time and change in metacognitive beliefs were also assessed using the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome Scale (CAS 1).
Results/conclusion
The results demonstrated improvements in depressive symptoms, rumination time and metacognitive beliefs after 7–12 sessions of MCT. Two out of three patients needed 1–3 booster sessions after approximately six months follow-up. However, the effects persisted at 12- months follow-up and all patients were recovered and did not meet the BD diagnosis according to the SCID. Limitations to the findings include the small number of participants and a decreasing baseline score in two of the participants. Nevertheless, it appears that metacognitive therapy is a feasible treatment for BD that might have potential positive effects. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are now needed to investigate this further.
期刊介绍:
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in
biological psychiatry,
brain research,
neurology,
neuropsychiatry,
neuropsychoimmunology,
psychopathology,
psychotherapy.
The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version.
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.