Metacognitive therapy for bipolar II disorder: A single case series study

Pia Callesen , Marianne Lunde Pedersen , Charlotte Koch Andersen , Adrian Wells
{"title":"Metacognitive therapy for bipolar II disorder: A single case series study","authors":"Pia Callesen ,&nbsp;Marianne Lunde Pedersen ,&nbsp;Charlotte Koch Andersen ,&nbsp;Adrian Wells","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a severe mental disease with a considerable reduction in life quality and high mortality. Self-management interventions and Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) are the most widely investigated psychological treatments for BD. However, recovery rates are low and only small to moderate effect sizes have been found. Metacognitive therapy is a relatively new treatment for mental disorders based on Wells and Matthews’ transdiagnostic model of emotional disorder – the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>MCT was delivered to three Danes with a diagnosis of BD ascertained using the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM). An A–B design with Multiple baseline measures was conducted and the effects associated with treatment was examined at post-treatment and follow-up and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), rumination time and change in metacognitive beliefs were also assessed using the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome Scale (CAS 1).</p></div><div><h3>Results/conclusion</h3><p>The results demonstrated improvements in depressive symptoms, rumination time and metacognitive beliefs after 7–12 sessions of MCT. Two out of three patients needed 1–3 booster sessions after approximately six months follow-up. However, the effects persisted at 12- months follow-up and all patients were recovered and did not meet the BD diagnosis according to the SCID. Limitations to the findings include the small number of participants and a decreasing baseline score in two of the participants. Nevertheless, it appears that metacognitive therapy is a feasible treatment for BD that might have potential positive effects. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are now needed to investigate this further.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"38 ","pages":"Pages 107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.08.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Bipolar Disorder (BD) is a severe mental disease with a considerable reduction in life quality and high mortality. Self-management interventions and Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) are the most widely investigated psychological treatments for BD. However, recovery rates are low and only small to moderate effect sizes have been found. Metacognitive therapy is a relatively new treatment for mental disorders based on Wells and Matthews’ transdiagnostic model of emotional disorder – the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF).

Method

MCT was delivered to three Danes with a diagnosis of BD ascertained using the SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM). An A–B design with Multiple baseline measures was conducted and the effects associated with treatment was examined at post-treatment and follow-up and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), rumination time and change in metacognitive beliefs were also assessed using the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome Scale (CAS 1).

Results/conclusion

The results demonstrated improvements in depressive symptoms, rumination time and metacognitive beliefs after 7–12 sessions of MCT. Two out of three patients needed 1–3 booster sessions after approximately six months follow-up. However, the effects persisted at 12- months follow-up and all patients were recovered and did not meet the BD diagnosis according to the SCID. Limitations to the findings include the small number of participants and a decreasing baseline score in two of the participants. Nevertheless, it appears that metacognitive therapy is a feasible treatment for BD that might have potential positive effects. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are now needed to investigate this further.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相情感障碍II的元认知治疗:一项个案系列研究
背景双相情感障碍(BD)是一种严重的精神疾病,生活质量显著下降,死亡率高。自我管理干预和认知行为疗法(CBT)是研究最广泛的双相障碍心理治疗方法。然而,恢复率很低,只发现了小到中等的效果。元认知疗法是基于Wells和Matthews的情绪障碍的跨诊断模型-自我调节执行功能(Self-Regulatory Executive Function, S-REF)的一种相对较新的精神障碍治疗方法。方法采用SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM)对3例诊断为双相障碍的丹麦患者进行mct检查。采用多重基线测量的A-B设计,并在治疗后和随访以及6个月和12个月检查与治疗相关的效果。主要观察指标为贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II),并采用认知注意综合征量表(CAS - 1)评估反刍时间和元认知信念的改变。结果/结论经7-12次MCT治疗后,抑郁症状、反刍时间和元认知信念均有改善。三分之二的患者在大约六个月的随访后需要1-3次加强治疗。然而,在12个月的随访中,效果持续存在,所有患者都恢复了,根据SCID不符合双相障碍的诊断。研究结果的局限性包括参与者人数少,其中两名参与者的基线得分下降。尽管如此,元认知疗法似乎是一种可行的双相障碍治疗方法,可能具有潜在的积极作用。现在需要更大规模的研究和随机对照试验来进一步调查这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in biological psychiatry, brain research, neurology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychoimmunology, psychopathology, psychotherapy. The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version. Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.
期刊最新文献
Seizure and COVID-19: Association and review of potential mechanism Mental health research in the lower-middle-income countries of Africa and Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review Acute changes in cerebral blood flow after single-infusion ketamine in major depression: A pilot study Depression and its association with quality of life among elderly: An elderly home- cross sectional study Quality of Thai media reporting of suicidal behavior: Compliance against the World Health Organization media guidelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1