Technological Evolution and the Political Agency of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of General Organology and Universal Organicism

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Informacios Tarsadalom Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.2.4
Kamila Kwapińska
{"title":"Technological Evolution and the Political Agency of Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of General Organology and Universal Organicism","authors":"Kamila Kwapińska","doi":"10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of political agency with respect to artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant insofar as we can observe efforts to regulate it. Some policy proposals link the problem of the advance of AI to the concept of technological evolution. However, it is still not quite clear what they mean by this concept. This paper explores conceptualisations of technological agency and evolution in Bernard Stiegler’s general organology and Friedrich Schelling’s universal organicism. I argue that organicism proposes a more ‘naturalised’ approach to agency formation and a more ‘organic’ explanation of technology than general organology. General organology considers technological evolution from a human perspective, whereas universal organicism can accommodate a theory of technological evolution independently from its social dimensions. While technology already has a strong impact on the organisation of our societies, recognition of technological agency as at least partially independent serves to recognise them as non-human beings that impact politics.","PeriodicalId":41114,"journal":{"name":"Informacios Tarsadalom","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacios Tarsadalom","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxii.2022.2.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of political agency with respect to artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant insofar as we can observe efforts to regulate it. Some policy proposals link the problem of the advance of AI to the concept of technological evolution. However, it is still not quite clear what they mean by this concept. This paper explores conceptualisations of technological agency and evolution in Bernard Stiegler’s general organology and Friedrich Schelling’s universal organicism. I argue that organicism proposes a more ‘naturalised’ approach to agency formation and a more ‘organic’ explanation of technology than general organology. General organology considers technological evolution from a human perspective, whereas universal organicism can accommodate a theory of technological evolution independently from its social dimensions. While technology already has a strong impact on the organisation of our societies, recognition of technological agency as at least partially independent serves to recognise them as non-human beings that impact politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从广义有机论和普遍有机论看技术进化与人工智能的政治机构
人工智能(AI)方面的政治机构问题正变得越来越重要,因为我们可以观察到监管它的努力。一些政策建议将人工智能的发展问题与技术进化的概念联系起来。然而,他们对这个概念的理解仍然不太清楚。本文探讨了斯蒂格勒的一般有机体论和谢林的普遍有机体论中技术能动性和进化的概念。我认为,与一般的有机体学相比,有机体论提出了一种更“自然化”的方法来形成代理,并对技术进行了更“有机”的解释。一般有机体学从人类的角度考虑技术进化,而普遍有机体学可以容纳一种独立于其社会维度的技术进化理论。虽然技术已经对我们的社会组织产生了强大的影响,但承认技术机构至少部分独立,有助于将它们视为影响政治的非人类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informacios Tarsadalom
Informacios Tarsadalom INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
„Feltaláltuk újra az internetet?” Szülői bevonódás a digitális nevelésben: szisztematikus szakirodalom-elemzés Makrogazdasági adatok által determinált teniszsikerek 38 OECD-ország elit női játékosának vizsgálatában Az adatműveltség és a kritikai szellem Kiállítási kommunikáció a kiterjesztett térben
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1