Witty City Boys: Urban Masculinity and Citizen Gallants in The City Wit, Greene’s Tu Quoque, and The City Madam

Q3 Arts and Humanities Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1086/716758
R. Arab
{"title":"Witty City Boys: Urban Masculinity and Citizen Gallants in The City Wit, Greene’s Tu Quoque, and The City Madam","authors":"R. Arab","doi":"10.1086/716758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he activities, services, entertainments, and goods available in earlymodern London were not enjoyed and consumed exclusively by the gentle classes. t Nor were wit, ingenuity, and performative prowess—pinpointed by critics as London-based competencies—the exclusive purview of London’s gentlemen gallants. Nevertheless, the dominant narrative offered by seventeenth-century plays, a narrative reinforced by decades of literary criticism, emphasizes the London gentry, and particularly young urban gallants, as the primary consumers of London culture and holders of London-based cultural capital. As this narrative goes, when citizens do engage in the pleasures on offer in London or display sophisticated wit and London-based knowledges, they do so aspirationally, as a means of finding or cementing their place among the urban gentry. This dominant narrative is not, of course, inaccurate, but it is incomplete. In “Witty City Boys,” I work from the premise that culturally valued London-based competencies did not belong solely to the elite; more specifically, I argue that they were an integral element in the emergence of a youthful urban masculine ethos that was adopted by youngmale Londoners of both citizen and gentle rank. To young citizen men, the status such cultural capital accrued was by no means always linked to class mobility; on the contrary, select seventeenth-century London comedies present young citizen men who display pride both in their citizen status and in their urban sophistication. To these characters, urban competencies are part of their identity as citizens; they are not ameans of transcending their class and climbing into the gentry. These characters suggest that a keen understanding of and ability tomaneuverwithin London’s sophisticated cultural pleasures and complex social relations was an achievement of an urbane masculine status, a form of gender status that could be and was increasingly delaminated from class, even while class awareness and pride continued to be salient elements of early modern English identity.","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"49 1","pages":"155 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

he activities, services, entertainments, and goods available in earlymodern London were not enjoyed and consumed exclusively by the gentle classes. t Nor were wit, ingenuity, and performative prowess—pinpointed by critics as London-based competencies—the exclusive purview of London’s gentlemen gallants. Nevertheless, the dominant narrative offered by seventeenth-century plays, a narrative reinforced by decades of literary criticism, emphasizes the London gentry, and particularly young urban gallants, as the primary consumers of London culture and holders of London-based cultural capital. As this narrative goes, when citizens do engage in the pleasures on offer in London or display sophisticated wit and London-based knowledges, they do so aspirationally, as a means of finding or cementing their place among the urban gentry. This dominant narrative is not, of course, inaccurate, but it is incomplete. In “Witty City Boys,” I work from the premise that culturally valued London-based competencies did not belong solely to the elite; more specifically, I argue that they were an integral element in the emergence of a youthful urban masculine ethos that was adopted by youngmale Londoners of both citizen and gentle rank. To young citizen men, the status such cultural capital accrued was by no means always linked to class mobility; on the contrary, select seventeenth-century London comedies present young citizen men who display pride both in their citizen status and in their urban sophistication. To these characters, urban competencies are part of their identity as citizens; they are not ameans of transcending their class and climbing into the gentry. These characters suggest that a keen understanding of and ability tomaneuverwithin London’s sophisticated cultural pleasures and complex social relations was an achievement of an urbane masculine status, a form of gender status that could be and was increasingly delaminated from class, even while class awareness and pride continued to be salient elements of early modern English identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机智的城市男孩:《城市机智》、格林的《屠》和《城市夫人》中的城市男子气概和公民气概
现代早期伦敦的活动、服务、娱乐和商品并不是只有温文尔雅的阶层才能享受和消费的。t机智、独创性和表演能力——被评论家们称为伦敦的能力——也不是伦敦绅士们的专属权限。尽管如此,十七世纪戏剧提供的主导叙事,几十年的文学批评强化了这种叙事,强调伦敦绅士,尤其是年轻的城市英雄,是伦敦文化的主要消费者和伦敦文化资本的持有者。正如这种说法所说,当市民确实参与到伦敦提供的乐趣中,或者表现出老练的智慧和伦敦的知识时,他们会满怀抱负地这样做,以此来寻找或巩固自己在城市绅士中的地位。当然,这种占主导地位的叙述并不准确,但它是不完整的。在《机智的城市男孩》中,我的工作前提是,文化上重视伦敦的能力不仅仅属于精英;更具体地说,我认为他们是年轻的城市男性气质出现的一个组成部分,这种气质被公民和温文尔雅的年轻伦敦人所采用。对于年轻的公民男性来说,这种文化资本积累的地位并不总是与阶级流动联系在一起;相反,精选的17世纪伦敦喜剧呈现了年轻的市民男性,他们对自己的公民身份和城市成熟度感到自豪。对这些人物来说,城市能力是他们作为公民身份的一部分;他们不是那种超越阶级、攀附士绅的人。这些人物表明,对伦敦复杂的文化乐趣和复杂的社会关系有着敏锐的理解和理解能力,这是一种有教养的男性地位的成就,一种可以而且越来越脱离阶级的性别地位形式,尽管阶级意识和自豪感仍然是早期现代英国人身份的突出元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Cosmic Conversion and Timon’s Block Affective Ecologies: Afterword Female Masquers and Ambiguity in Timon of Athens Imaginary Puissance: Historicizing “Setting” and Discourses of Control Tamburlaine, Able-Bodiedness, and the Skills of the Early Modern Player
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1