Os especialistas e o público

Q3 Social Sciences Estudos em Comunicacao Pub Date : 2018-05-30 DOI:10.20287/EC.N26.V2.A01
José Carlos Alexandre
{"title":"Os especialistas e o público","authors":"José Carlos Alexandre","doi":"10.20287/EC.N26.V2.A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international financial crisis, originated in the United States in 2007, was not anticipated by most scholars and policymakers. The Brexit and the vic- tory of Donald Trump in the US elections also surprised the majority of opinion makers. These events raise important issues, namely the actual forecasting capacity of experts. According to some authors, the spectre of populism is haunting the Western world. On the other hand, elitism, a kind of populism turned upside down, seems to gain a new life. Somehow, faith in humankind is scarce these days. There is a new coming of the views of the masses’ ignorance,  irresponsibility and irrationality. Furthermore, today the masses have a wide-ranging participation in pu- blic discussion through social media, without medi- ation. In this article, standing on the views of several authors on the relation between experts and the public, we explore the following questions: (1) In a democratic society, what is the contribution of experts to improve the methods and the setting of public discussion and, on the other hand, to the poli- tical decision-making processes? (2) in which conditions can experts’ forecasts be more accurate than the public emotions and intuitions?","PeriodicalId":55854,"journal":{"name":"Estudos em Comunicacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos em Comunicacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N26.V2.A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international financial crisis, originated in the United States in 2007, was not anticipated by most scholars and policymakers. The Brexit and the vic- tory of Donald Trump in the US elections also surprised the majority of opinion makers. These events raise important issues, namely the actual forecasting capacity of experts. According to some authors, the spectre of populism is haunting the Western world. On the other hand, elitism, a kind of populism turned upside down, seems to gain a new life. Somehow, faith in humankind is scarce these days. There is a new coming of the views of the masses’ ignorance,  irresponsibility and irrationality. Furthermore, today the masses have a wide-ranging participation in pu- blic discussion through social media, without medi- ation. In this article, standing on the views of several authors on the relation between experts and the public, we explore the following questions: (1) In a democratic society, what is the contribution of experts to improve the methods and the setting of public discussion and, on the other hand, to the poli- tical decision-making processes? (2) in which conditions can experts’ forecasts be more accurate than the public emotions and intuitions?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家和公众
2007年起源于美国的国际金融危机并没有被大多数学者和政策制定者预料到。英国脱欧和唐纳德·特朗普在美国大选中的失败也让大多数舆论制造者感到惊讶。这些事件提出了一些重要问题,即专家的实际预测能力。根据一些作者的说法,民粹主义的幽灵正在困扰西方世界。另一方面,精英主义,一种颠倒过来的民粹主义,似乎获得了新生。不知怎的,如今人们对人类的信心越来越少。群众的无知、不负责任和不合理的观点又出现了。此外,如今,群众可以通过社交媒体广泛参与公共讨论,而无需干预。在这篇文章中,根据几位作者对专家与公众之间关系的看法,我们探讨了以下问题:(1)在民主社会中,专家对改善公众讨论的方法和环境,另一方面对政治决策过程有什么贡献?(2) 在什么情况下,专家的预测比公众的情绪和直觉更准确?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Estudos em Comunicacao
Estudos em Comunicacao Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The main guidelines of the Journal editorial policy are oriented to the concepts of "citizenship" and "participation", understood from a communicational point of view, involving processes and devices of knowledge circulation and opinion formation in the political field in general, and in specific areas of public policy such as health, education, science culture, public opinion, gender and identity. As examples of priority interests areas one finds the following: journalism and public opinion; citizen, participatory and public journalism; responsibility and accountability of institutions, governments and companies; media and public sphere; social movements in the areas of environment, science, health, ecology, culture, identity and gender; media and political parties; political representation; new forms of online participation; methods of analysis of participation; digital democracy; media, deliberation and participation; communitarian communication; communication and development; policies of recognition and comparative studies of communication in different geographical and cultural contexts, among others.
期刊最新文献
Entre o profano e o sagrado: ritos, símbolos e mitos na campanha de um time de futebol brasileiro Access and appropriation of journalistic news on social networks in Brazil: Refining the notion of “participation” “Era bom que trocássemos umas ideias sobre o assunto”: análise à retórica da tecnologia Redes, ativismo e mobilizações públicas. Ação coletiva e ação conectada O recurso ao Transmedia Storytelling para promoção da imagem de uma empresa de design e criatividade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1