{"title":"Os especialistas e o público","authors":"José Carlos Alexandre","doi":"10.20287/EC.N26.V2.A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international financial crisis, originated in the United States in 2007, was not anticipated by most scholars and policymakers. The Brexit and the vic- tory of Donald Trump in the US elections also surprised the majority of opinion makers. These events raise important issues, namely the actual forecasting capacity of experts. According to some authors, the spectre of populism is haunting the Western world. On the other hand, elitism, a kind of populism turned upside down, seems to gain a new life. Somehow, faith in humankind is scarce these days. There is a new coming of the views of the masses’ ignorance, irresponsibility and irrationality. Furthermore, today the masses have a wide-ranging participation in pu- blic discussion through social media, without medi- ation. In this article, standing on the views of several authors on the relation between experts and the public, we explore the following questions: (1) In a democratic society, what is the contribution of experts to improve the methods and the setting of public discussion and, on the other hand, to the poli- tical decision-making processes? (2) in which conditions can experts’ forecasts be more accurate than the public emotions and intuitions?","PeriodicalId":55854,"journal":{"name":"Estudos em Comunicacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos em Comunicacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N26.V2.A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The international financial crisis, originated in the United States in 2007, was not anticipated by most scholars and policymakers. The Brexit and the vic- tory of Donald Trump in the US elections also surprised the majority of opinion makers. These events raise important issues, namely the actual forecasting capacity of experts. According to some authors, the spectre of populism is haunting the Western world. On the other hand, elitism, a kind of populism turned upside down, seems to gain a new life. Somehow, faith in humankind is scarce these days. There is a new coming of the views of the masses’ ignorance, irresponsibility and irrationality. Furthermore, today the masses have a wide-ranging participation in pu- blic discussion through social media, without medi- ation. In this article, standing on the views of several authors on the relation between experts and the public, we explore the following questions: (1) In a democratic society, what is the contribution of experts to improve the methods and the setting of public discussion and, on the other hand, to the poli- tical decision-making processes? (2) in which conditions can experts’ forecasts be more accurate than the public emotions and intuitions?
期刊介绍:
The main guidelines of the Journal editorial policy are oriented to the concepts of "citizenship" and "participation", understood from a communicational point of view, involving processes and devices of knowledge circulation and opinion formation in the political field in general, and in specific areas of public policy such as health, education, science culture, public opinion, gender and identity. As examples of priority interests areas one finds the following: journalism and public opinion; citizen, participatory and public journalism; responsibility and accountability of institutions, governments and companies; media and public sphere; social movements in the areas of environment, science, health, ecology, culture, identity and gender; media and political parties; political representation; new forms of online participation; methods of analysis of participation; digital democracy; media, deliberation and participation; communitarian communication; communication and development; policies of recognition and comparative studies of communication in different geographical and cultural contexts, among others.