Consumer Responses to Firms’ Voluntary Disclosure of Information

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1086/722269
R. Avery, J. Cawley, Julia C. P. Eddelbuettel, Matthew D. Eisenberg, Charlie Mann, A. Mathios
{"title":"Consumer Responses to Firms’ Voluntary Disclosure of Information","authors":"R. Avery, J. Cawley, Julia C. P. Eddelbuettel, Matthew D. Eisenberg, Charlie Mann, A. Mathios","doi":"10.1086/722269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper estimates the impact on consumer behavior of a firm’s voluntary disclosure of information. Specifically, we study the impact of Starbucks’ disclosure of calorie information on its menu boards in June 2013. Using a large data set of consumers’ visits to specific restaurant chains, we estimate difference-in-difference models that compare the change in the probability that consumers recently visited Starbucks with the change in the probability that they recently visited a similar chain that did not disclose calorie information: Dunkin’ Donuts. Estimates from difference-in-differences models indicate that we cannot reject the null hypothesis that Starbucks’ disclosure of calorie information had no detectable impact on the probability that consumers patronized Starbucks in the past month. However, we find an effect among men; after Starbucks’ information disclosure, the probability that men visit the chain fell by 1.0 percentage points (10.7 percent). There is no evidence of heterogeneity in effect by education or clinical weight classification. These results are useful for understanding how consumers respond to the voluntary disclosure of information, a decision many firms face.","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":"9 1","pages":"22 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper estimates the impact on consumer behavior of a firm’s voluntary disclosure of information. Specifically, we study the impact of Starbucks’ disclosure of calorie information on its menu boards in June 2013. Using a large data set of consumers’ visits to specific restaurant chains, we estimate difference-in-difference models that compare the change in the probability that consumers recently visited Starbucks with the change in the probability that they recently visited a similar chain that did not disclose calorie information: Dunkin’ Donuts. Estimates from difference-in-differences models indicate that we cannot reject the null hypothesis that Starbucks’ disclosure of calorie information had no detectable impact on the probability that consumers patronized Starbucks in the past month. However, we find an effect among men; after Starbucks’ information disclosure, the probability that men visit the chain fell by 1.0 percentage points (10.7 percent). There is no evidence of heterogeneity in effect by education or clinical weight classification. These results are useful for understanding how consumers respond to the voluntary disclosure of information, a decision many firms face.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者对企业自愿披露信息的反应
本文估计了企业自愿披露信息对消费者行为的影响。具体而言,我们研究了2013年6月星巴克在其菜单板上披露卡路里信息的影响。使用消费者访问特定连锁餐厅的大量数据集,我们估计了差异模型的差异,该模型将消费者最近访问星巴克的概率变化与他们最近访问未披露卡路里信息的类似连锁店Dunkin’Donuts的概率变化进行了比较。差异模型的估计表明,我们不能拒绝星巴克披露卡路里信息对消费者在过去一个月光顾星巴克的概率没有明显影响的无效假设。然而,我们在男性中发现了一种影响;星巴克信息披露后,男性光顾该连锁店的概率下降了1.0个百分点(10.7%)。没有证据表明教育或临床体重分类的效果存在异质性。这些结果有助于了解消费者对自愿披露信息的反应,这是许多公司面临的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Post-Acute Care Payment Reform on Caregiving From Lawn Care to Home Care: Undocumented Immigration and Aging in Place Heterogeneous Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Emergency Department Visits and Payer Composition among Older Adults by Race and Ethnicity Increased Schooling Reduces Hospitalization Later in Life: New Evidence with Optimal Instruments from the United States Financial Risk and the Decision of Small Employers to Self-Fund Health Insurance: Evidence from Stop Loss Regulation in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1