The COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine: Process Evaluation, Opinion Analysis

Z. Palian, O. I. Zolotenkova, A. Savchenko
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine: Process Evaluation, Opinion Analysis","authors":"Z. Palian, O. I. Zolotenkova, A. Savchenko","doi":"10.31767/su.2(93)2021.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has proved to be a real test of survival for modern humanity. The global crisis has affected not only the health care system, but also the entire social sphere. For the second year in a row, the world economy is under stress, and countries around the world are assessing and forecasting the scale of economic losses, trying to determine the size of direct and indirect demographic losses. It’s impossible to coordinate the implementation of anti-epidemic measures and disease prevention without adequate response and support from the population. And this requires an analysis of social behavior, its motivation and attitude to the relevant actions of state and local authorities. \nThe article considers the current trends in the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine and in some European countries. Seasonal fluctuations and cyclical changes in the prevalence of this disease and the number of deaths caused by coronavirus are analyzed. The 7-day seasonal fluctuations are to some extent explained by the peculiarities of the initial registration of such events in Ukraine. After all, some of the test results and medical certificates of death caused by coronavirus disease are submitted to the relevant authorities with some delay. There is a multi-day registration lag after the weekend, when most instances do not work, so the input information is processed with a delay. \nThe statistical estimates of expected daily number of infected with COVID-19 virus and deaths from this cause (data of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine for March-December 2020 and January 2021) are based on an analysis of these trends in the context of effectiveness of preventive measures from “quarantine in free day” up to a hard lockdown. \nThe article provides a quantitative assessment of the population's response to anti-epidemic measures of government agencies. Database of research comprised a series of opinion polls within the monitoring “Ukraine under quarantine” and “Assessment of Healthcare”, the sociological group “Rating” for 2020–2021. The results of the statistical analysis of psycho-emotional state of the population during the COVID-crisis showed significant differences in the responses of certain respondents groups by age, gender and place of residence. \nUsing non-parametric methods of statistics, the level of Ukrainian population trust in international and domestic medical institutions, as well as in information coming from various sources was estimated. It turned out that respondents are almost 20 times more willing to read news from regular Internet resources than from the official website of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine and rely more on WHO data. \nIn the perspective of further research, a statistical analysis of the demographic consequences of the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine is planned.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(93)2021.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has proved to be a real test of survival for modern humanity. The global crisis has affected not only the health care system, but also the entire social sphere. For the second year in a row, the world economy is under stress, and countries around the world are assessing and forecasting the scale of economic losses, trying to determine the size of direct and indirect demographic losses. It’s impossible to coordinate the implementation of anti-epidemic measures and disease prevention without adequate response and support from the population. And this requires an analysis of social behavior, its motivation and attitude to the relevant actions of state and local authorities. The article considers the current trends in the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine and in some European countries. Seasonal fluctuations and cyclical changes in the prevalence of this disease and the number of deaths caused by coronavirus are analyzed. The 7-day seasonal fluctuations are to some extent explained by the peculiarities of the initial registration of such events in Ukraine. After all, some of the test results and medical certificates of death caused by coronavirus disease are submitted to the relevant authorities with some delay. There is a multi-day registration lag after the weekend, when most instances do not work, so the input information is processed with a delay. The statistical estimates of expected daily number of infected with COVID-19 virus and deaths from this cause (data of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine for March-December 2020 and January 2021) are based on an analysis of these trends in the context of effectiveness of preventive measures from “quarantine in free day” up to a hard lockdown. The article provides a quantitative assessment of the population's response to anti-epidemic measures of government agencies. Database of research comprised a series of opinion polls within the monitoring “Ukraine under quarantine” and “Assessment of Healthcare”, the sociological group “Rating” for 2020–2021. The results of the statistical analysis of psycho-emotional state of the population during the COVID-crisis showed significant differences in the responses of certain respondents groups by age, gender and place of residence. Using non-parametric methods of statistics, the level of Ukrainian population trust in international and domestic medical institutions, as well as in information coming from various sources was estimated. It turned out that respondents are almost 20 times more willing to read news from regular Internet resources than from the official website of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine and rely more on WHO data. In the perspective of further research, a statistical analysis of the demographic consequences of the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine is planned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰COVID-19大流行:进程评估和意见分析
事实证明,新冠肺炎大流行是对现代人类生存的真正考验。这场全球危机不仅影响了卫生保健系统,还影响了整个社会领域。世界经济连续第二年承受压力,世界各国都在评估和预测经济损失的规模,试图确定直接和间接人口损失的规模。没有民众的充分响应和支持,就不可能协调实施防疫措施和预防疾病。这需要对社会行为、其动机和对国家和地方当局相关行动的态度进行分析。本文考虑了SARS-CoV2感染在乌克兰和一些欧洲国家传播的当前趋势。分析了该疾病流行率和冠状病毒死亡人数的季节性波动和周期性变化。7天的季节性波动在一定程度上可以用乌克兰这类事件最初登记的特殊性来解释。毕竟,一些检测结果和新冠肺炎死亡医学证明提交给有关部门的时间有些延迟。周末之后会有几天的注册延迟,此时大多数实例都不能工作,因此输入信息的处理会有延迟。预计每天感染COVID-19病毒的人数和由此导致的死亡人数的统计估计(乌克兰国家安全和国防委员会2020年3月至12月和2021年1月的数据)是根据对这些趋势的分析,从“自由日隔离”到“硬封锁”的预防措施的有效性。本文对民众对政府机构采取的防疫措施的反应进行了定量评估。研究数据库包括在监测"隔离下的乌克兰"和"保健评估"、社会学小组"评级" 2020-2021年范围内进行的一系列民意调查。对疫情期间人群心理情绪状态的统计分析结果显示,不同年龄、性别和居住地的部分被调查人群的反应存在显著差异。使用非参数统计方法,估计了乌克兰人口对国际和国内医疗机构以及来自各种来源的信息的信任程度。结果表明,受访者阅读常规互联网资源新闻的意愿几乎是乌克兰卫生部官方网站新闻的20倍,他们更依赖世卫组织的数据。从进一步研究的角度来看,计划对乌克兰SARS-CoV2感染传播的人口后果进行统计分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Ukrainian Trace on the Way of Development of the International Statistical Institute Information and Analytical Support for the Management of Law Enforcement and Socio-Economic Activities (on the Basis of Methodologies and Practices of Applied Statistics) The Mortality from External Causes: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the War in Ukraine Interaction of Social Capital Forms in the Structure of Civil Society Networks: Managerial Aspect Counteracting the Risks of International Investment in the Conditions of War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1