States and non-state actors in hegemonic and counter-hegemonic narratives in international law: the Nigerian experience

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/2049677x.2020.1830490
Joycelin Chinwe Eze-Okubuiro
{"title":"States and non-state actors in hegemonic and counter-hegemonic narratives in international law: the Nigerian experience","authors":"Joycelin Chinwe Eze-Okubuiro","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2020.1830490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical background of Nigeria as a state and how state and non-state actors within its domain influence the nation's domestic and international activities demonstrate the conflict and complexity between dominant ideologies and resistance between competing actors in Nigeria. Such struggles arose following the imposition of colonial rule and subsequent introduction of the English legal system, which unsettled existing indigenous systems that were hugely dependent on customary law. Although such platforms successfully served colonial interests, they were challenged by different resistance groups. Through historical narrative, this paper contributes to Global South scholarship in the hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourse in international law, with Nigeria as a case study. The paper shows that in order to successfully address hegemonic tendencies, which flow from the international system and are sustained by the Nigerian state, the resistant role of non-state actors is imperative in the making of international law to accommodate the Nigerian experience.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"144 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677x.2020.1830490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677x.2020.1830490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The historical background of Nigeria as a state and how state and non-state actors within its domain influence the nation's domestic and international activities demonstrate the conflict and complexity between dominant ideologies and resistance between competing actors in Nigeria. Such struggles arose following the imposition of colonial rule and subsequent introduction of the English legal system, which unsettled existing indigenous systems that were hugely dependent on customary law. Although such platforms successfully served colonial interests, they were challenged by different resistance groups. Through historical narrative, this paper contributes to Global South scholarship in the hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourse in international law, with Nigeria as a case study. The paper shows that in order to successfully address hegemonic tendencies, which flow from the international system and are sustained by the Nigerian state, the resistant role of non-state actors is imperative in the making of international law to accommodate the Nigerian experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法霸权和反霸权叙事中的国家和非国家行为者:尼日利亚的经验
尼日利亚作为一个国家的历史背景,以及其领域内的国家和非国家行为者如何影响国家的国内和国际活动,表明了尼日利亚主流意识形态与竞争行为者之间的冲突和复杂性。这种斗争是在实行殖民统治和随后引入英国法律制度之后产生的,这使严重依赖习惯法的现有土著制度感到不安。尽管这些平台成功地为殖民地利益服务,但它们受到了不同抵抗团体的挑战。通过历史叙述,本文以尼日利亚为例,对国际法中的霸权和反霸权话语中的全球南方学术做出了贡献。论文表明,为了成功应对来自国际体系并由尼日利亚国家维持的霸权主义趋势,非国家行为者在制定国际法时必须发挥抵抗作用,以适应尼日利亚的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Arbeit und Familie in Nordwesteuropa im Spätmittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit / Travail et famille en Europe du Nord-Ouest au bas Moyen Âge et à l’époque moderne We, the King. Creating royal legislation in the sixteenth century Spanish New World The ideal river: how control of nature shaped the international order Intervention and state sovereignty in Central Europe, 1500–1780 Comparative nomogenetics: revisiting Wigmore’s oriental(ist) encounter and the taxonomy of his approach to global legal history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1