Individual Approach to the Shadow Economy

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics Pub Date : 2017-06-30 DOI:10.1177/0260107917709169
Marco Tolla
{"title":"Individual Approach to the Shadow Economy","authors":"Marco Tolla","doi":"10.1177/0260107917709169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the relationship between the shadow economy and tax evasion in order to verify if their dynamics are substantially identical or may present elements of differentiation, even though the two aforementioned phenomena appear (on the basis of certain statistical definitions) to overlap in terms of economic values. To this end, the article proceeds by providing a series of terminological definitions that are useful to properly classify these phenomena and then it lists the main methodologies used for their quantification. Although such methods and their strengths and weaknesses are well known in economic studies, it is useful to recall them in order to underline some questions connected with the development of a model aimed at describing the approach to the shadow economy and tax evasion from a microeconomic perspective. The first question is if the underground economy can exist in absence of tax evasion and, in that case, which are the factors that allow it. A related question is how is it possible from a microeconomic perspective to estimate in percentage the overall disadvantage (fiscal and non-fiscal) deriving from the total declaration of economic activities to public authorities compared to firms that work in the underground economy? On this matter, reference to case law and regulatory measures, performed in order to create an economic-juridical parallel on the shadow economy and tax evasion, has been made with regard to the Italian legal system, so as to fit the mathematical model as much as possible to observed facts. JEL: K42, H26, O17","PeriodicalId":42664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0260107917709169","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107917709169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between the shadow economy and tax evasion in order to verify if their dynamics are substantially identical or may present elements of differentiation, even though the two aforementioned phenomena appear (on the basis of certain statistical definitions) to overlap in terms of economic values. To this end, the article proceeds by providing a series of terminological definitions that are useful to properly classify these phenomena and then it lists the main methodologies used for their quantification. Although such methods and their strengths and weaknesses are well known in economic studies, it is useful to recall them in order to underline some questions connected with the development of a model aimed at describing the approach to the shadow economy and tax evasion from a microeconomic perspective. The first question is if the underground economy can exist in absence of tax evasion and, in that case, which are the factors that allow it. A related question is how is it possible from a microeconomic perspective to estimate in percentage the overall disadvantage (fiscal and non-fiscal) deriving from the total declaration of economic activities to public authorities compared to firms that work in the underground economy? On this matter, reference to case law and regulatory measures, performed in order to create an economic-juridical parallel on the shadow economy and tax evasion, has been made with regard to the Italian legal system, so as to fit the mathematical model as much as possible to observed facts. JEL: K42, H26, O17
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人对影子经济的看法
本文分析了影子经济与逃税之间的关系,以验证它们的动态是否基本相同或可能存在差异,即使上述两种现象(基于某些统计定义)在经济价值方面出现重叠。为此,本文首先提供了一系列有助于对这些现象进行适当分类的术语定义,然后列出了用于量化这些现象的主要方法。虽然这些方法及其优缺点在经济研究中是众所周知的,但回顾它们是有用的,以便强调与旨在从微观经济角度描述处理影子经济和逃税方法的模型的发展有关的一些问题。第一个问题是,地下经济是否可以在没有逃税的情况下存在,如果是这样的话,是哪些因素允许它存在。一个相关的问题是,与从事地下经济的公司相比,如何可能从微观经济学的角度估计向公共当局申报经济活动总额所产生的总体劣势(财政和非财政)的百分比?在这个问题上,参考了判例法和管制措施,以便在影子经济和逃税问题上建立经济-司法的平行关系,并就意大利的法律制度进行了讨论,以便使数学模型尽可能符合观察到的事实。耶利米书:k42, h26, o17
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The explosion of information and research that has taken place in recent years has had a profound effect upon a variety of existing academic disciplines giving rise to the dissolution of barriers between some, mergers between others, and the creation of entirely new fields of enquiry.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Evolution Analysis of Cryptocurrency Market: A Network Science Study Green Transitions in Developing Countries: Perspectives on Women’s Political Leadership Can Cryptocurrencies Provide Better Diversification Benefits? Evidence from the Indian Stock Market A Bibliographic Review of Illusion of Knowledge in the Financial Field Assessment and Forecasting of the Military, Economic and Demographic Impact of the Russian–Ukrainian War on the National Economy of Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1