Undermining teachers’ social capital: a question of trust, professionalism, and empowerment

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Sociology of Education Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1080/01425692.2023.2179018
N. Dulfer, Amy McKernan, J. Kriewaldt
{"title":"Undermining teachers’ social capital: a question of trust, professionalism, and empowerment","authors":"N. Dulfer, Amy McKernan, J. Kriewaldt","doi":"10.1080/01425692.2023.2179018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The question of professional trust urgently needs closer attention in relation to teacher recruitment and retention, as this research shows it has significant bearing on the symbolic capital that may help to attract, motivate, and sustain high quality teachers. In Australian schools, teachers are frequently subject to initiatives to improve their practice, address their perceived limitations, and hold them accountable for failing students, schools, or systems. We argue that teachers, in the advent of these reforms intended to improve them, come to believe they are distrusted in their professional roles. Denying teachers the sense of themselves as capable professionals risks contributing to the problems of retention that are becoming ever more urgent in the Australian context and elsewhere in the world. This article explores the impacts of discourses and policy directions on teachers’ perceptions of professional trust. Drawing on case study data from two schools in the state of Victoria, Australia, we highlight the ways discourses of professional distrust emerge through policy directives that position teachers as ‘the problem’ in education.","PeriodicalId":48085,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology of Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"418 - 434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2023.2179018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The question of professional trust urgently needs closer attention in relation to teacher recruitment and retention, as this research shows it has significant bearing on the symbolic capital that may help to attract, motivate, and sustain high quality teachers. In Australian schools, teachers are frequently subject to initiatives to improve their practice, address their perceived limitations, and hold them accountable for failing students, schools, or systems. We argue that teachers, in the advent of these reforms intended to improve them, come to believe they are distrusted in their professional roles. Denying teachers the sense of themselves as capable professionals risks contributing to the problems of retention that are becoming ever more urgent in the Australian context and elsewhere in the world. This article explores the impacts of discourses and policy directions on teachers’ perceptions of professional trust. Drawing on case study data from two schools in the state of Victoria, Australia, we highlight the ways discourses of professional distrust emerge through policy directives that position teachers as ‘the problem’ in education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
削弱教师的社会资本:信任、专业和赋权的问题
本研究表明,专业信任对吸引、激励和维持高质量教师的象征性资本具有重要影响,因此在教师招聘和保留中,专业信任问题迫切需要密切关注。在澳大利亚的学校里,教师经常要主动改进他们的实践,解决他们的局限性,并要求他们对失败的学生、学校或系统负责。我们认为,教师,在这些旨在提高他们的改革出现时,开始相信他们在他们的专业角色中是不被信任的。否认教师作为有能力的专业人士的意识可能会导致在澳大利亚和世界其他地方变得越来越紧迫的留用问题。本文探讨了话语和政策导向对教师专业信任感知的影响。根据澳大利亚维多利亚州两所学校的案例研究数据,我们强调了将教师定位为教育“问题”的政策指令所产生的专业不信任话语的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: British Journal of Sociology of Education is one of the most renowned international scholarly journals in the field. The journal publishes high quality original, theoretically informed analyses of the relationship between education and society, and has an outstanding record of addressing major global debates about the social significance and impact of educational policy, provision, processes and practice in many countries around the world. The journal engages with a diverse range of contemporary and emergent social theories along with a wide range of methodological approaches. Articles investigate the discursive politics of education, social stratification and mobility, the social dimensions of all aspects of pedagogy and the curriculum, and the experiences of all those involved, from the most privileged to the most disadvantaged. The vitality of the journal is sustained by its commitment to offer independent, critical evaluations of the ways in which education interfaces with local, national, regional and global developments, contexts and agendas in all phases of formal and informal education. Contributions are expected to take into account the wide international readership of British Journal of Sociology of Education, and exhibit knowledge of previously published articles in the field. Submissions should be well located within sociological theory, and should not only be rigorous and reflexive methodologically, but also offer original insights to educational problems and or perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Wrestling with the ghost of deficit: exploring the experiences of trainee English further education teachers Care experienced students’ transitions to university: learning identities, prior educational experiences and socio-cultural contexts Exploring student support, class solidarity and transformative pedagogy: insights from Working Class Academics ‘It’s sharing a point in time’: the temporal dimensions of shared reading in families Do you speak Français? The hidden social structures of bilingualism at an international boarding school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1