Felt respect in political discussions with contrary-minded others

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Social and Personal Relationships Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1177/02654075231195531
Adrian Rothers, J. Cohrs
{"title":"Felt respect in political discussions with contrary-minded others","authors":"Adrian Rothers, J. Cohrs","doi":"10.1177/02654075231195531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes people feel respected or disrespected in political discussions with contrary-minded others? In two survey studies, participants recalled a situation in which they had engaged in a discussion about a political topic. In Study 1 ( n = 126), we used qualitative methods to document a wide array of behaviors and expressions that made people feel (dis)respected in such discussions, and derived a list of nine motives that may have underlain their significance for (dis)respect judgments. Study 2 ( n = 523) used network analysis tools to explore how the satisfaction of these candidate motives is associated with felt respect. On the whole, respect was associated with the satisfaction or frustration of motives for esteem, fairness, autonomy, relatedness, and knowledge. In addition, the pattern of associations differed for participants who reported on a discussion with a stranger versus with someone they knew well, suggesting that the meaning of respect is best understood within the respective interaction context. We discuss pathways towards theoretical accounts of respect that are both broadly applicable and situationally specific.","PeriodicalId":48288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231195531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What makes people feel respected or disrespected in political discussions with contrary-minded others? In two survey studies, participants recalled a situation in which they had engaged in a discussion about a political topic. In Study 1 ( n = 126), we used qualitative methods to document a wide array of behaviors and expressions that made people feel (dis)respected in such discussions, and derived a list of nine motives that may have underlain their significance for (dis)respect judgments. Study 2 ( n = 523) used network analysis tools to explore how the satisfaction of these candidate motives is associated with felt respect. On the whole, respect was associated with the satisfaction or frustration of motives for esteem, fairness, autonomy, relatedness, and knowledge. In addition, the pattern of associations differed for participants who reported on a discussion with a stranger versus with someone they knew well, suggesting that the meaning of respect is best understood within the respective interaction context. We discuss pathways towards theoretical accounts of respect that are both broadly applicable and situationally specific.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在与思想相反的人进行政治讨论时感受到尊重
在与持相反观点的人进行政治讨论时,是什么让人们感到被尊重或不被尊重?在两项调查研究中,参与者回忆了他们参与政治话题讨论的情景。在研究1 (n = 126)中,我们使用定性方法记录了各种各样的行为和表达,这些行为和表达使人们在这样的讨论中感到(不)受尊重,并得出了九种动机的列表,这些动机可能是他们对(不)尊重判断的重要性的基础。研究2 (n = 523)使用网络分析工具来探索这些候选动机的满意度如何与感觉尊重相关。总的来说,尊重与尊重、公平、自主、亲缘关系和知识动机的满足或挫折有关。此外,报告与陌生人和熟悉的人讨论的参与者的联想模式不同,这表明尊重的含义在各自的互动环境中得到最好的理解。我们讨论了对尊重的理论解释的途径,这些理论既广泛适用,又具体到具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
17.90%
发文量
187
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Personal Relationships is an international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research on social and personal relationships. JSPR is the leading journal in the field, publishing empirical and theoretical papers on social and personal relationships. It is multidisciplinary in scope, drawing material from the fields of social psychology, clinical psychology, communication, developmental psychology, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Social ties and social identification: Influences on well-being in young adults. The more useful, the more close: Instrumental deliberation boosts closeness with non-close others Social relationships in adults who were adopted following institutional deprivation Are there cross-cultural differences in the transformation of motivation process in close relationships? Joint trajectories of self-esteem and neuroticism among newlywed couples: Associations with marital quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1