Male and female Indonesian EFL undergraduate students’ metacognitive strategies in academic reading: planning, monitoring and evaluation strategies

Erina Andriani, C. Mbato
{"title":"Male and female Indonesian EFL undergraduate students’ metacognitive strategies in academic reading: planning, monitoring and evaluation strategies","authors":"Erina Andriani, C. Mbato","doi":"10.23971/jefl.v11i2.3006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metacognitive strategies have been investigated as helping tools for students’ reading comprehension, but their use may vary between males and females. Though gender is an essential factor in language learning, few studies highlighted the influence of gender on the metacognitive reading strategy use by Indonesian students. To fill in the gap, this study investigated the use of metacognitive strategies during academic reading from a gender perspective. A mixed-method was adopted, with open-ended and close-ended questionnaires and a semi-structured interview used to gather the data. From the quantitative data analysis, the students used most metacognitive strategies to a high degree. The only significantly different strategy use was guessing meaning (F=0.232, p<0.05), where male students used it more often. From the qualitative data analysis, the female students used more strategy variations than the male students (20 and 18 strategy variations respectively).  The students shared some similar and some different reasons to use metacognitive reading strategies. The results suggested the gender influence on male students to make predictions. The findings from this research will prompt English teachers to introduce metacognitive strategies in reading through appropriate instructions and guidance to enable the students to implement and develop their metacognitive strategies in academic reading.","PeriodicalId":31243,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.3006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Metacognitive strategies have been investigated as helping tools for students’ reading comprehension, but their use may vary between males and females. Though gender is an essential factor in language learning, few studies highlighted the influence of gender on the metacognitive reading strategy use by Indonesian students. To fill in the gap, this study investigated the use of metacognitive strategies during academic reading from a gender perspective. A mixed-method was adopted, with open-ended and close-ended questionnaires and a semi-structured interview used to gather the data. From the quantitative data analysis, the students used most metacognitive strategies to a high degree. The only significantly different strategy use was guessing meaning (F=0.232, p<0.05), where male students used it more often. From the qualitative data analysis, the female students used more strategy variations than the male students (20 and 18 strategy variations respectively).  The students shared some similar and some different reasons to use metacognitive reading strategies. The results suggested the gender influence on male students to make predictions. The findings from this research will prompt English teachers to introduce metacognitive strategies in reading through appropriate instructions and guidance to enable the students to implement and develop their metacognitive strategies in academic reading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼英语本科男女学生学术阅读的元认知策略:计划、监控和评价策略
元认知策略作为学生阅读理解的辅助工具已被研究,但其使用在男女之间存在差异。虽然性别是语言学习的重要因素,但很少有研究强调性别对印尼学生元认知阅读策略使用的影响。为了填补这一空白,本研究从性别角度研究了学术阅读过程中元认知策略的使用。采用混合方法,采用开放式封闭式问卷和半结构化访谈的方式收集数据。从定量数据分析来看,学生对元认知策略的使用程度较高。唯一显著不同的策略使用是猜测意义(F=0.232, p<0.05),其中男学生更经常使用它。从定性数据分析来看,女生比男生使用更多的策略变体(分别为20和18)。学生们分享了使用元认知阅读策略的一些相似和不同的原因。结果表明,性别影响了男学生做出预测。本研究的发现将促使英语教师通过适当的指导和引导,在阅读中引入元认知策略,使学生在学术阅读中实施和发展元认知策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Indonesian EFL teachers’ attitudes toward the differentiated curriculum in junior high schools and factors contributing to their attitudes Uncovering EFL students’ frequent difficulties in academic writing and the coping strategies: The case of a college in Indonesia Exploring influential factors and strategies for addressing speech delay of a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in English (L2) language acquisition A decade of Indonesian EFL students’ voices toward peer feedback practices during synchronous and asynchronous periods: A systematic literature review EFL students’ engagement in the post-pandemic teaching: Does technology matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1