{"title":"An Overview of Energy Savings Approaches on Hydraulic Drive Systems","authors":"Anil C. Mahato, S. Ghoshal","doi":"10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different procedures to improve the energy efficiency of a hydraulic drive system have been surveyed in this article. The energy-saving approaches are classified into four categories: hybridization, control algorithms, waste energy recovery and reduction of energy losses. Also, the sub-categories of each strategy are discussed individually in brief. The energy efficiency can go up to 69% using a hybridization strategy, whereas using a fuel-saving strategy is within the range of 20–40%. Another strategy, i.e., control algorithms, yields 40% of fuel savings on the displacement-controlled excavator system. Similarly, the maximum potential to recover the braking energy is about 78% in the case of the Constant Pressure System (CPS) system using flywheel under the category of waste energy recovery. Moreover, 56–66.1% throttling energy saving potential is observed on an On/Off high-speed valve-controlled hydraulic system under the reduction of energy loss strategy. Different energy saving potentials of the hydraulic system have been presented in tabular form for a clear understanding of the historical development in this field.","PeriodicalId":13977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fluid Power","volume":"1 1","pages":"81–118-81–118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fluid Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Different procedures to improve the energy efficiency of a hydraulic drive system have been surveyed in this article. The energy-saving approaches are classified into four categories: hybridization, control algorithms, waste energy recovery and reduction of energy losses. Also, the sub-categories of each strategy are discussed individually in brief. The energy efficiency can go up to 69% using a hybridization strategy, whereas using a fuel-saving strategy is within the range of 20–40%. Another strategy, i.e., control algorithms, yields 40% of fuel savings on the displacement-controlled excavator system. Similarly, the maximum potential to recover the braking energy is about 78% in the case of the Constant Pressure System (CPS) system using flywheel under the category of waste energy recovery. Moreover, 56–66.1% throttling energy saving potential is observed on an On/Off high-speed valve-controlled hydraulic system under the reduction of energy loss strategy. Different energy saving potentials of the hydraulic system have been presented in tabular form for a clear understanding of the historical development in this field.