Development of a pyrolysis model for oriented strand board: Part II—Thermal transport parameterization and bench-scale validation

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Fire Sciences Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1177/07349041211036651
Junhui Gong, Hongen Zhou, Hong Zhu, Conor G. McCoy, S. Stoliarov
{"title":"Development of a pyrolysis model for oriented strand board: Part II—Thermal transport parameterization and bench-scale validation","authors":"Junhui Gong, Hongen Zhou, Hong Zhu, Conor G. McCoy, S. Stoliarov","doi":"10.1177/07349041211036651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oriented strand board is a widely used construction material responsible for a substantial portion of the fire load of many buildings. To accurately model oriented strand board fire response, kinetics and thermodynamics of its thermal decomposition and combustion were carefully characterized using milligram-scale testing in part I of this study. In the current work, Controlled Atmosphere Pyrolysis Apparatus II tests were performed on representative gram-sized oriented strand board samples at a range of radiant heat fluxes. An automated inverse analysis of the sample temperature data obtained in these tests was employed to determine the thermal conductivities of the undecomposed oriented strand board and condensed-phase products of its decomposition. A complete pyrolysis model was formulated for this material and used to predict the mass loss rates measured in the Controlled Atmosphere Pyrolysis Apparatus II experiments. These mass loss rate profiles were predicted well with the exception of the second mass loss rate peak observed at 65 kW m−2 of radiant heat flux, which was underpredicted. To further validate the model, cone calorimeter tests were performed on oriented strand board at 25 and 50 kW m−2 of radiant heat flux. The results of these tests, including both mass loss rate and heat release rate profiles, were predicted reasonably well by the model.","PeriodicalId":15772,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fire Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fire Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07349041211036651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Oriented strand board is a widely used construction material responsible for a substantial portion of the fire load of many buildings. To accurately model oriented strand board fire response, kinetics and thermodynamics of its thermal decomposition and combustion were carefully characterized using milligram-scale testing in part I of this study. In the current work, Controlled Atmosphere Pyrolysis Apparatus II tests were performed on representative gram-sized oriented strand board samples at a range of radiant heat fluxes. An automated inverse analysis of the sample temperature data obtained in these tests was employed to determine the thermal conductivities of the undecomposed oriented strand board and condensed-phase products of its decomposition. A complete pyrolysis model was formulated for this material and used to predict the mass loss rates measured in the Controlled Atmosphere Pyrolysis Apparatus II experiments. These mass loss rate profiles were predicted well with the exception of the second mass loss rate peak observed at 65 kW m−2 of radiant heat flux, which was underpredicted. To further validate the model, cone calorimeter tests were performed on oriented strand board at 25 and 50 kW m−2 of radiant heat flux. The results of these tests, including both mass loss rate and heat release rate profiles, were predicted reasonably well by the model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定向刨花板热解模型的发展:第二部分-热传递参数化和实验规模验证
定向刨花板是一种广泛使用的建筑材料,承担了许多建筑物的很大一部分火灾负荷。为了准确地模拟面向刨花板的火灾反应,本研究的第一部分使用毫克级测试仔细表征了其热分解和燃烧的动力学和热力学。在当前的工作中,受控气氛热解装置II在一定范围的辐射热通量下对具有代表性的克级定向板样品进行了测试。对这些测试中获得的样品温度数据进行自动反分析,以确定未分解的定向刨花板及其分解后的冷凝相产物的导热系数。建立了该材料的完整热解模型,并用于预测可控气氛热解装置II实验中测量的质量损失率。除了在辐射热流密度为65 kW m−2时观测到的第二个质量损失率峰值被低估外,这些质量损失率曲线都得到了很好的预测。为了进一步验证该模型,在定向刨花板上进行了辐射热通量为25和50 kW m - 2的锥形量热仪测试。这些试验的结果,包括质量损失率和放热率分布,都可以通过模型很好地预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fire Sciences
Journal of Fire Sciences 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fire Sciences is a leading journal for the reporting of significant fundamental and applied research that brings understanding of fire chemistry and fire physics to fire safety. Its content is aimed toward the prevention and mitigation of the adverse effects of fires involving combustible materials, as well as development of new tools to better address fire safety needs. The Journal of Fire Sciences covers experimental or theoretical studies of fire initiation and growth, flame retardant chemistry, fire physics relative to material behavior, fire containment, fire threat to people and the environment and fire safety engineering. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
An experimental case study of escooter fire in a four-story building Measuring the fire growth potential of combustible solids using a cone calorimeter Reduced scale test bench for investigating the upward flame heat impact on external thermal insulation composite system facades Computational study on the glowing combustion of a wooden ember landing on a non-reacting substrate Fire-induced flows for complex fire scenarios in a mechanically ventilated two-storey structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1