The Archaeological Activities of the Scott-Stevensons in Cyprus, 1878–1883

IF 1.2 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Bulletin of the History of Archaeology Pub Date : 2020-10-27 DOI:10.5334/bha-629
A. Reeve
{"title":"The Archaeological Activities of the Scott-Stevensons in Cyprus, 1878–1883","authors":"A. Reeve","doi":"10.5334/bha-629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The British administration of Cyprus from July 1878 marked the beginning of the end of the ‘mythical age’ of Cypriot archaeology, as it was characterised by the British archaeologist John Linton Myres (1869–1954) (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899). Prior to this, Ottoman laws governing the excavation and export of antiquities were in operation, but not always consistently enforced. Some collectors managed to remove huge numbers of objects, most notoriously the Italian-American consul Luigi Palma di Cesnola (1832–1904) whose Cypriot antiquities formed the founding collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, and his brother Alessandro (1839–1914) (Goring 1988; Kiely and Ulbrich 2012; Masson 1992). After the advent of the British administration, the official position was initially to ban private excavation (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi), though this ban appears to have been lifted around May 1879 (Stanley-Price 2001: 269). Small-scale exploration was undertaken by the German archaeologist Max Ohnefalsch-Richter, on behalf of museums and private individuals (Stanley-Price 2001, 2018). The first British-led larger scale excavations under the new regime, in 1882, were proposed by Lieutenant Herbert Kitchener (1850–1916), Director of Survey, and supervised by the colonial administrator George Gordon Hake (1847–1903). Funded by the South Kensington Museum rather than the British Museum, they focused on obtaining aesthetically pleasing objects rather than archaeological recording (Bailey 1965; Kiely 2011). The Cyprus Museum, the first national institution for discovering, storing, displaying and studying the island’s antiquities, was founded in 1882, and under the Ottoman Law of Antiquities of 1874 had first claim on one-third of finds excavated through private initiatives, and ownership of all the products of any excavations it sponsored (StanleyPrice 2001: 270). However, it was stymied by lack of funds, affecting its ability to undertake excavations, provide proper facilities for storage and display, and ensure that its dues from private excavations were collected (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi). The early years of the British administration were characterised by an unfocused and casual approach to excavating antiquities. For the new administration, grappling with a range of complex issues and hampered by limited funding, proper governance of antiquities was not a high priority. Meanwhile, military and civilian officials posted to Cyprus purchased antiquities from local excavators and collectors and explored its archaeology, considered to be one of the leisure activities afforded by the island, in a spirit of idle enquiry. Spending a limited amount of time on the island – sometimes just a few months – these temporary residents lacked the opportunities of earlier consular collectors and local antiquarians to build up expertise and an appreciation of the island’s history. University of Leeds, GB anna.h.reeve@gmail.com Reeve, A. 2020. The Archaeological Activities of the Scott-Stevensons in Cyprus, 1878–1883. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 30(1): 7, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-629 Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","PeriodicalId":41664,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The British administration of Cyprus from July 1878 marked the beginning of the end of the ‘mythical age’ of Cypriot archaeology, as it was characterised by the British archaeologist John Linton Myres (1869–1954) (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899). Prior to this, Ottoman laws governing the excavation and export of antiquities were in operation, but not always consistently enforced. Some collectors managed to remove huge numbers of objects, most notoriously the Italian-American consul Luigi Palma di Cesnola (1832–1904) whose Cypriot antiquities formed the founding collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, and his brother Alessandro (1839–1914) (Goring 1988; Kiely and Ulbrich 2012; Masson 1992). After the advent of the British administration, the official position was initially to ban private excavation (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi), though this ban appears to have been lifted around May 1879 (Stanley-Price 2001: 269). Small-scale exploration was undertaken by the German archaeologist Max Ohnefalsch-Richter, on behalf of museums and private individuals (Stanley-Price 2001, 2018). The first British-led larger scale excavations under the new regime, in 1882, were proposed by Lieutenant Herbert Kitchener (1850–1916), Director of Survey, and supervised by the colonial administrator George Gordon Hake (1847–1903). Funded by the South Kensington Museum rather than the British Museum, they focused on obtaining aesthetically pleasing objects rather than archaeological recording (Bailey 1965; Kiely 2011). The Cyprus Museum, the first national institution for discovering, storing, displaying and studying the island’s antiquities, was founded in 1882, and under the Ottoman Law of Antiquities of 1874 had first claim on one-third of finds excavated through private initiatives, and ownership of all the products of any excavations it sponsored (StanleyPrice 2001: 270). However, it was stymied by lack of funds, affecting its ability to undertake excavations, provide proper facilities for storage and display, and ensure that its dues from private excavations were collected (Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi). The early years of the British administration were characterised by an unfocused and casual approach to excavating antiquities. For the new administration, grappling with a range of complex issues and hampered by limited funding, proper governance of antiquities was not a high priority. Meanwhile, military and civilian officials posted to Cyprus purchased antiquities from local excavators and collectors and explored its archaeology, considered to be one of the leisure activities afforded by the island, in a spirit of idle enquiry. Spending a limited amount of time on the island – sometimes just a few months – these temporary residents lacked the opportunities of earlier consular collectors and local antiquarians to build up expertise and an appreciation of the island’s history. University of Leeds, GB anna.h.reeve@gmail.com Reeve, A. 2020. The Archaeological Activities of the Scott-Stevensons in Cyprus, 1878–1883. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 30(1): 7, pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-629 Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯科特-斯蒂文森家族在塞浦路斯的考古活动,1878-1883
1878年7月英国对塞浦路斯的管理标志着塞浦路斯考古学“神话时代”的结束,正如英国考古学家John Linton Myres(1869-1954)所描述的那样(Myres and ohnefalch - richter 1899)。在此之前,管理文物挖掘和出口的奥斯曼法律一直在运作,但并不总是始终如一地执行。一些收藏家设法移走了大量物品,最臭名昭著的是意大利裔美国领事路易吉·帕尔马·迪·切斯诺拉(Luigi Palma di Cesnola, 1832-1904)和他的兄弟亚历山德罗(Alessandro, 1839-1914)(戈林1988;Kiely and Ulbrich 2012;马森1992)。在英国政府上台后,官方最初的立场是禁止私人挖掘(Myres and Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi),尽管这一禁令似乎在1879年5月左右被解除了(Stanley-Price 2001: 269)。德国考古学家Max Ohnefalsch-Richter代表博物馆和个人进行了小规模的勘探(Stanley-Price 2001, 2018)。1882年,英国领导的第一次大规模发掘是在新政权下进行的,由测量主任赫伯特·基奇纳中尉(1850-1916)提议,并由殖民地行政长官乔治·戈登·哈克(1847-1903)监督。由南肯辛顿博物馆而不是大英博物馆资助,他们专注于获得美学上令人愉悦的物品,而不是考古记录(Bailey 1965;基利2011)。塞浦路斯博物馆成立于1882年,是第一个发现、储存、展示和研究该岛古物的国家机构,根据1874年的奥斯曼古物法,塞浦路斯博物馆首先对通过私人倡议挖掘的三分之一的发现拥有所有权,并对其赞助的任何挖掘的所有产品拥有所有权(StanleyPrice 2001: 270)。然而,由于缺乏资金,它受到了阻碍,影响了它进行挖掘的能力,提供适当的储存和展示设施,并确保其从私人挖掘中收取的费用(Myres和Ohnefalsch-Richter 1899: vi)。英国政府早期的特点是挖掘文物的方法不集中和随意。对于新一届政府来说,要应对一系列复杂的问题,并受到资金有限的阻碍,对文物的妥善管理并不是当务之急。与此同时,派驻塞浦路斯的军事和文职官员从当地的挖掘者和收藏家那里购买古物,并本着无所事事的调查精神探索其考古,这被认为是该岛提供的休闲活动之一。这些临时居民在岛上的时间有限,有时只有几个月,他们缺乏早期领事收藏家和当地古物学家积累专业知识和对该岛历史的欣赏的机会。英国利兹大学anna.h.reeve@gmail.com Reeve, A. 2020。斯科特-斯蒂文森家族在塞浦路斯的考古活动,1878-1883。考古通报,30(1):7,pp. 1 - 13。DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bha-629考古学历史公报
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
‘Archaeology is but Ethnology in the past tense’. Theoretical Proofs and Intellectual Technologies in André Leroi-Gourhan’s Archived Archéologie du Pacifique-Nord, 1946 Mr Miles, Mr Oldfield and Professor Huxley: Early Thoughts on the Origins of the Australians Rewriting the Past for the Changing Present: The Need for New and Pluriversal Histories of Archaeology Smuggling Cuneiform Tablets in Aniseed Bags: Profile of a Sale Made by Elias Gejou to the British Museum in 1896 Christian Archaeology in Malta between the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries from Two Unknown Letters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1