Multivariable Model Predictive Control to Control Bio-H2 Production from Biomass

IF 2.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL ChemEngineering Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.3390/chemengineering7010007
Muhammad Adjisetya, A. Wahid
{"title":"Multivariable Model Predictive Control to Control Bio-H2 Production from Biomass","authors":"Muhammad Adjisetya, A. Wahid","doi":"10.3390/chemengineering7010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two significant units in biomass-based hydrogen plants are the compressor and steam reformer. The compressor works to achieve high pressure for further operations, while the steam reformer produces H2 gas. For the units to operate well against disturbances that may occur (regulatory control) or changes in the set point (servo control), as well as the interactions between the relevant process variables, a Multivariable Model Predictive Control (MMPC) is considered as a controller. The determination of MMPC parameters, including the sampling time (T), prediction horizon (P), and control horizon (M), is crucial for achieving such objectives. Therefore, in this study, MMPC parameter adjustment was performed. The Integral of Absolute Error (IAE) and Integral of Square Error (ISE) were used as control performance indicators. For comparison, we considered the IAE and ISE from the Single-Input Single-Output (SISO)-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) from previous research. As a result, the optimum MMPC parameters were found to be T = 1, P = 341, and M = 121 for the compressor unit, and T = 1, P = 45, and M = 21 for the steam reformer unit. The average increases in control performance (IAE and ISE), compared to the MPC (SISO) used in previous research, were 85.84% for compressor unit 1, 61.39% for compressor unit 2, 94.57% for compressor unit 3, and 73.35% for compressor unit 4. Meanwhile, in the steam reformer unit, the increases in control performance were 63.34% for the heater and 80.16% for the combustor.","PeriodicalId":9755,"journal":{"name":"ChemEngineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering7010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two significant units in biomass-based hydrogen plants are the compressor and steam reformer. The compressor works to achieve high pressure for further operations, while the steam reformer produces H2 gas. For the units to operate well against disturbances that may occur (regulatory control) or changes in the set point (servo control), as well as the interactions between the relevant process variables, a Multivariable Model Predictive Control (MMPC) is considered as a controller. The determination of MMPC parameters, including the sampling time (T), prediction horizon (P), and control horizon (M), is crucial for achieving such objectives. Therefore, in this study, MMPC parameter adjustment was performed. The Integral of Absolute Error (IAE) and Integral of Square Error (ISE) were used as control performance indicators. For comparison, we considered the IAE and ISE from the Single-Input Single-Output (SISO)-based Model Predictive Control (MPC) from previous research. As a result, the optimum MMPC parameters were found to be T = 1, P = 341, and M = 121 for the compressor unit, and T = 1, P = 45, and M = 21 for the steam reformer unit. The average increases in control performance (IAE and ISE), compared to the MPC (SISO) used in previous research, were 85.84% for compressor unit 1, 61.39% for compressor unit 2, 94.57% for compressor unit 3, and 73.35% for compressor unit 4. Meanwhile, in the steam reformer unit, the increases in control performance were 63.34% for the heater and 80.16% for the combustor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物质产氢的多变量模型预测控制
生物质制氢装置中的两个重要装置是压缩机和蒸汽转化炉。压缩机工作以获得进一步操作所需的高压,而蒸汽转化炉产生H2气体。为了使机组能够很好地应对可能发生的干扰(调节控制)或设定值的变化(伺服控制)以及相关过程变量之间的相互作用,多变量模型预测控制(MMPC)被认为是一种控制器。MMPC参数的确定,包括采样时间(T)、预测水平(P)和控制水平(M),对于实现这些目标至关重要。因此,本研究进行了MMPC参数调整。以绝对误差积分(IAE)和平方误差积分(ISE)作为对照性能指标。为了进行比较,我们考虑了先前研究中基于单输入单输出(SISO)的模型预测控制(MPC)的IAE和ISE。结果表明,压缩机组的最佳MMPC参数为T = 1, P = 341, M = 121,蒸汽转化机组的最佳MMPC参数为T = 1, P = 45, M = 21。与先前研究中使用的MPC (SISO)相比,压缩机组1的控制性能(IAE和ISE)的平均增幅为85.84%,压缩机组2的增幅为61.39%,压缩机组3的增幅为94.57%,压缩机组4的增幅为73.35%。同时,在蒸汽转化装置中,加热器和燃烧室的控制性能分别提高了63.34%和80.16%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ChemEngineering
ChemEngineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Catalysts Based on Iron Oxides for Wastewater Purification from Phenolic Compounds: Synthesis, Physicochemical Analysis, Determination of Catalytic Activity Effect of Inserting Baffles on the Solid Particle Segregation Behavior in Fluidized Bed Reactor: A Computational Study Force Field for Calculation of the Vapor-Liquid Phase Equilibrium of trans-Decalin Antisolvent Crystallization of Papain Ultrafiltration to Increase the Consistency of Fruit Pulps: The Role of Permeate Flux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1