Patient perspectives of pain mitigation strategies for adult vaccine injections

K. Cull, S. Bowles, N. MacDonald, S. Mcneil, B. Taylor, K. Slayter, A. Steenbeek, A. Taddio, Lucie M. Bucci, J. Isenor
{"title":"Patient perspectives of pain mitigation strategies for adult vaccine injections","authors":"K. Cull, S. Bowles, N. MacDonald, S. Mcneil, B. Taylor, K. Slayter, A. Steenbeek, A. Taddio, Lucie M. Bucci, J. Isenor","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2021.1967113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate an educational pamphlet that incorporates evidence-based pain mitigation strategies during adult vaccine injections and determine its effect on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward use of such strategies among adults in the community receiving immunizations. Methods An evidence-based pamphlet about how to reduce pain during vaccination in adults was distributed to a convenience sample of community sites that administer vaccines, including family physician offices, travel clinics, and pharmacies. Providers at the community sites distributed a baseline (pre) questionnaire followed by the pamphlet to study participants. Then participants were vaccinated. Six weeks later, participants were contacted to complete a follow-up (post) questionnaire. Participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding pain mitigation strategies for vaccine injections were evaluated before and after access to the pamphlet. Results Seventy-four people receiving vaccines participated. Participants were predominantly university educated (69%) and female (66%), with a median age of 44.5 years (range, 18–71). Most participants received an injection at a travel or public health clinic (73%). Twenty-seven percent had prior accurate knowledge of pain mitigation strategies. Self-reported pain or fear of needle pain did not change from before access to the pamphlet to six weeks after. Twenty percent of participants used at least one strategy outlined in the pamphlet and found it helpful and 52% were interested in sharing the pamphlet with others. Conclusions An educational pamphlet about vaccination pain mitigation resulted in a positive change in knowledge and attitudes around pain mitigation strategies. Further research is needed to explore long-term impact.","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"5 1","pages":"183 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2021.1967113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate an educational pamphlet that incorporates evidence-based pain mitigation strategies during adult vaccine injections and determine its effect on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward use of such strategies among adults in the community receiving immunizations. Methods An evidence-based pamphlet about how to reduce pain during vaccination in adults was distributed to a convenience sample of community sites that administer vaccines, including family physician offices, travel clinics, and pharmacies. Providers at the community sites distributed a baseline (pre) questionnaire followed by the pamphlet to study participants. Then participants were vaccinated. Six weeks later, participants were contacted to complete a follow-up (post) questionnaire. Participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding pain mitigation strategies for vaccine injections were evaluated before and after access to the pamphlet. Results Seventy-four people receiving vaccines participated. Participants were predominantly university educated (69%) and female (66%), with a median age of 44.5 years (range, 18–71). Most participants received an injection at a travel or public health clinic (73%). Twenty-seven percent had prior accurate knowledge of pain mitigation strategies. Self-reported pain or fear of needle pain did not change from before access to the pamphlet to six weeks after. Twenty percent of participants used at least one strategy outlined in the pamphlet and found it helpful and 52% were interested in sharing the pamphlet with others. Conclusions An educational pamphlet about vaccination pain mitigation resulted in a positive change in knowledge and attitudes around pain mitigation strategies. Further research is needed to explore long-term impact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人疫苗注射疼痛缓解策略的患者视角
摘要目的本研究的目的是评估一本教育小册子,该小册子包含了成人疫苗注射过程中基于证据的疼痛缓解策略,并确定其对接受免疫接种的社区成年人使用此类策略的知识、态度和行为的影响。方法将一本关于如何减轻成人疫苗接种过程中疼痛的循证小册子分发到接种疫苗的社区站点的便利样本中,包括家庭医生办公室、旅行诊所和药店。社区站点的提供者向研究参与者分发了一份基线(预)问卷,然后是小册子。然后参与者接种了疫苗。六周后,联系参与者完成一份后续(事后)问卷。在获得小册子之前和之后,对参与者关于疫苗注射疼痛缓解策略的知识、态度和行为进行了评估。结果74名接种者参加了疫苗接种。参与者主要受过大学教育(69%)和女性(66%),中位年龄为44.5岁(18-21岁)。大多数参与者在旅行或公共卫生诊所接受注射(73%)。27%的人之前对疼痛缓解策略有准确的了解。从接触小册子之前到六周后,自我报告的疼痛或对针刺的恐惧没有改变。20%的参与者至少使用了小册子中概述的一种策略,并认为它很有帮助,52%的参与者有兴趣与他人分享小册子。结论一本关于疫苗接种缓解疼痛的教育小册子使人们对缓解疼痛策略的知识和态度发生了积极的变化。需要进一步研究以探索长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Prospective Preference Assessment for the Psilocybin for Enhanced Analgesia in Chronic nEuropathic PAIN (PEACE-PAIN) Trial. Assessing Quality of Referrals to a Community-Based Chronic Pain Clinic. The Influence of Loneliness on Pain Outcomes for Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Chronic pain experiences of immigrant Indian women in Canada: A photovoice exploration. [Enhancing Chronic Pain Management: Exploring the Essential Contribution of Primary Care Nurses].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1