PD51-11 REPORTING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOLS

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000000953.011
S. Williams, M. Cumberbatch, A. Kamat, P. Kerr, J. McGrath, H. Djaladat, J. Collins, I. Jubber, V. Packiam, G. Steinberg, Eugene K Lee, W. Kassouf, P. Black, Y. Cerantola, J. Catto, S. Daneshmand
{"title":"PD51-11 REPORTING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOLS","authors":"S. Williams, M. Cumberbatch, A. Kamat, P. Kerr, J. McGrath, H. Djaladat, J. Collins, I. Jubber, V. Packiam, G. Steinberg, Eugene K Lee, W. Kassouf, P. Black, Y. Cerantola, J. Catto, S. Daneshmand","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000000953.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UCB had a higher frequency of stage pT3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63e9.03; p[0.002) and risk of lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.15e5.76; p[0.02), ureteral marginpositive (OR 12.18; 95% CI, 4.62e32.13; p<0.00001), and perivesical soft tissue margin-positive (OR 12.31; 95% CI, 5.15e29.41; p<0.00001) status after radical cystectomy than those with C-UCB. Although there was no difference in CSM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82e2.40; p[0.22) between PV-UCB and C-UCB, PV-UCB had worse survival outcomes (OM) than C-UCB approaching the borderline of significance (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.98e2.68; p[0.06) when adjusted for other clinicopathological characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: PV-UCB was strongly associated with adverse clinicopathological features and worse OM compared to CUCB after adjusting other clinicopathological parameters, and PV histology of UCB is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival.","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000953.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

UCB had a higher frequency of stage pT3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63e9.03; p[0.002) and risk of lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.15e5.76; p[0.02), ureteral marginpositive (OR 12.18; 95% CI, 4.62e32.13; p<0.00001), and perivesical soft tissue margin-positive (OR 12.31; 95% CI, 5.15e29.41; p<0.00001) status after radical cystectomy than those with C-UCB. Although there was no difference in CSM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82e2.40; p[0.22) between PV-UCB and C-UCB, PV-UCB had worse survival outcomes (OM) than C-UCB approaching the borderline of significance (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.98e2.68; p[0.06) when adjusted for other clinicopathological characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: PV-UCB was strongly associated with adverse clinicopathological features and worse OM compared to CUCB after adjusting other clinicopathological parameters, and PV histology of UCB is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PD51-11 报告实施强化术后恢复(ERAS)方案后根治性膀胱切除术的结果
UCB具有较高的pT3期频率(比值比[OR],3.84;95%置信区间[CI],1.63e9.03;p[0.002)和淋巴结转移风险(OR,2.58;95%CI,1.15e5.76;p[0.02)、输尿管边缘阳性(OR 12.18;95%CI,4.62e32.13;p<0.0001)和膀胱周围软组织边缘阳性(OR12.31;95%CI 5.15e29.41;p<0.00001)与C-UCB患者相比,根治性膀胱切除术后的状态。尽管PV-UCB和C-UCB之间的CSM没有差异(危险比[HR],1.40;95%CI,0.82e2.40;p[0.22),但PV-UCB的生存结果(OM)比接近显著性边界的C-UCB差(HR,1.62;95%CI 0.98e2.68;p[0.06)当根据其他临床病理特征进行调整时。结论:在调整其他临床病理参数后,与CUCB相比,PV-UCB与不良临床病理特征和更差的OM密切相关,UCB的PV组织学是影响总生存率的独立预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Urologic Oncology: Bladder, Penis, and Urethral Cancer and Basic Principles of Oncology. Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid in Radical Cystectomy: Impact on Bleeding, Thromboembolism, and Survival Outcomes. Spontaneous Resolution of Primary Obstructive Megaureter: Risk Stratification and Prediction Based on Early Sonographic Factors. Validation of Prognostic Models for Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence, Cancer-Specific Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality. Development and Validation of the Length, Segment, and Etiology Anterior Urethral Stricture Disease Staging System Using Longitudinal Urethroplasty Outcomes Data From the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1