Oedipus the King as a Paradigm for Family Trauma Cinema
G. Finney
求助PDF
{"title":"Oedipus the King as a Paradigm for Family Trauma Cinema","authors":"G. Finney","doi":"10.5406/jfilmvideo.72.3-4.0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2020 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois in a 2008 collection of essays titled Rethinking Tragedy, Rita Felski points out that despite a resurgence of work on tragedy in recent years, one area that has virtually ignored the subject of tragedy is film criticism (6). Although essays have appeared since that time on individual films, systematic work on the conjunction of the two media has not been done. Jennifer Wallace claims that “[f]ilm is not traditionally considered a tragic art form” (172): the pleasure and escapism associated with film viewing are inimical to the spirit and aim of tragedy. Yet she distinguishes certain subgenres of film that achieve a “new language of tragic cinema” (172), such as film noir, the epic film typified by the work of director David Lean, the Western epics of Sergio Leone, the European films exemplified by Krzysztof Kiéslowski’s Three Colours trilogy, and Lars von Trier’s “Dogma” school of filmmaking (172–76). I would disagree with the notion that film is opposed to the spirit of tragedy. It is my contention that the cinema today, as an organ of popular culture of mass proportions, plays a role in our culture similar to that which theater played for the ancient Greeks. Like Greek theater, which was intended to be performed and not read, film is a visual genre. Both Greek tragedy and film possess enormous cathartic power and broad aesthetic scope. The classical Greek tragedians, well aware that all that is necessary for a tragedy is a family, based many of their plays on transmitted myths about doomed families, above all the House of Atreus. Analogously, I have identified a further tragic subgenre in contemporary film in addition to those listed by Wallace: the cinema of family trauma in the United States. What do I mean by family trauma? Radical alienation between family members, addictions of all kinds, child and spousal abuse, child molestation and parentchild incest, sibling incest, loss of one’s child or parent, suicide, and murder—all in the family. Because the number of American films dealing with family trauma appears to have increased during the 1990s and especially around 2000, I focus on the millennium. Although family trauma is a perennial theme and also occurs in avant-garde and foreign films, its treatment in millennial mainstream American film often employs strategies of displacement, projection, repression, and sublimation in order to moderate traumatic experience that would otherwise be very difficult for actors to convey and/or for audiences to view. To mention a few examples:","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"72 1","pages":"64 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jfilmvideo.72.3-4.0064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
©2020 by the board of trustees of the university of illinois in a 2008 collection of essays titled Rethinking Tragedy, Rita Felski points out that despite a resurgence of work on tragedy in recent years, one area that has virtually ignored the subject of tragedy is film criticism (6). Although essays have appeared since that time on individual films, systematic work on the conjunction of the two media has not been done. Jennifer Wallace claims that “[f]ilm is not traditionally considered a tragic art form” (172): the pleasure and escapism associated with film viewing are inimical to the spirit and aim of tragedy. Yet she distinguishes certain subgenres of film that achieve a “new language of tragic cinema” (172), such as film noir, the epic film typified by the work of director David Lean, the Western epics of Sergio Leone, the European films exemplified by Krzysztof Kiéslowski’s Three Colours trilogy, and Lars von Trier’s “Dogma” school of filmmaking (172–76). I would disagree with the notion that film is opposed to the spirit of tragedy. It is my contention that the cinema today, as an organ of popular culture of mass proportions, plays a role in our culture similar to that which theater played for the ancient Greeks. Like Greek theater, which was intended to be performed and not read, film is a visual genre. Both Greek tragedy and film possess enormous cathartic power and broad aesthetic scope. The classical Greek tragedians, well aware that all that is necessary for a tragedy is a family, based many of their plays on transmitted myths about doomed families, above all the House of Atreus. Analogously, I have identified a further tragic subgenre in contemporary film in addition to those listed by Wallace: the cinema of family trauma in the United States. What do I mean by family trauma? Radical alienation between family members, addictions of all kinds, child and spousal abuse, child molestation and parentchild incest, sibling incest, loss of one’s child or parent, suicide, and murder—all in the family. Because the number of American films dealing with family trauma appears to have increased during the 1990s and especially around 2000, I focus on the millennium. Although family trauma is a perennial theme and also occurs in avant-garde and foreign films, its treatment in millennial mainstream American film often employs strategies of displacement, projection, repression, and sublimation in order to moderate traumatic experience that would otherwise be very difficult for actors to convey and/or for audiences to view. To mention a few examples:
《俄狄浦斯王》:家庭创伤电影的典范
©2020由伊利诺伊大学董事会在2008年的论文集《反思悲剧》中,丽塔·费尔斯基指出,尽管近年来关于悲剧的工作重新兴起,但有一个领域实际上忽略了悲剧的主题,那就是电影批评(6)。尽管从那时起就有关于个别电影的文章出现,但关于两种媒体结合的系统工作还没有完成。珍妮弗·华莱士声称“电影在传统上并不被认为是一种悲剧的艺术形式”(172):与观影相关的快乐和逃避主义与悲剧的精神和目的是背道而驰的。然而,她区分了一些实现“悲剧电影新语言”(172)的电影亚类型,如黑色电影,以导演大卫·里恩的作品为代表的史诗电影,塞尔吉奥·莱昂内的西方史诗电影,以克日什托夫·基姆斯洛斯基的《三色》三部曲为代表的欧洲电影,以及拉斯·冯·提尔的“教条”电影制作流派(172 - 76)。我不同意电影反对悲剧精神的观点。我的观点是,今天的电影,作为大众文化的一个器官,在我们的文化中所起的作用类似于戏剧在古希腊所起的作用。就像希腊戏剧是为了表演而不是为了阅读一样,电影也是一种视觉类型。希腊悲剧和电影都具有巨大的宣泄力量和广阔的审美范围。古典希腊悲剧家很清楚,一个悲剧所必需的只是一个家庭,他们的许多戏剧都是基于流传下来的关于注定要失败的家庭的神话,尤其是阿特柔斯家族。类似地,除了华莱士列出的那些,我还发现了当代电影中另一个悲剧亚类型:美国的家庭创伤电影。我说的家庭创伤是什么意思?家庭成员之间的极端疏远,各种各样的成瘾,虐待儿童和配偶,猥亵儿童和亲子乱伦,兄弟姐妹乱伦,失去孩子或父母,自杀和谋杀——所有这些都发生在家庭中。因为在20世纪90年代,尤其是2000年前后,处理家庭创伤的美国电影数量似乎有所增加,所以我把重点放在了千禧年。虽然家庭创伤是一个永恒的主题,也出现在前卫电影和外国电影中,但在千禧一代的美国主流电影中,家庭创伤的处理往往采用位移、投射、压抑和升华的策略,以缓和演员难以传达和/或观众难以观看的创伤体验。举几个例子:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。