An audit of complications of complex operative gynaecological laparoscopy at a tertiary healthcare facility in South Africa

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.7196/sajog.1640
C. N. Omile, S. Ramphal, J. Moodley
{"title":"An audit of complications of complex operative gynaecological laparoscopy at a tertiary healthcare facility in South Africa","authors":"C. N. Omile, S. Ramphal, J. Moodley","doi":"10.7196/sajog.1640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Operative laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over traditional/open laparotomy. However, it is also associated with complications particularly when performed for complex gynaecological procedures. There are very few reports on operative laparoscopic surgery from developing countries. Objective. To evaluate the intraand postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic surgery performed for complex gynaecological conditions by a single surgeon at a tertiary institution. Method. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent complex laparoscopic surgery between 2004 and 2016. Results. We retrieved 446 patient records. Surgery for extensive endometriosis (29.8%) and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (29.8%) were the most common procedures. Less than a tenth of patients (4.3%; n=19) had complications, 9 had minor injuries (4 inferior epigastric vessel injury, 1 peritoneal vessel injury, 1 omental vessel injury, 1 surface tissue bleeding and 2 cases of postoperative ileus) and 10 had major injuries (6 intestinal, 2 ureteric and 3 bladder). More than a quarter of complications (26.3%; n=5) occurred at the time of abdominal entry, 63.2% (n=12) occured intraoperatively and 10.5% (n=2) occurred postoperatively. All entry injuries were vascular. Intestinal injury was the most common intraoperative complication. Conclusion. Despite the many advantages of laparoscopic surgery, complications occur particularly in patients with complex gynaecological pathology.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajog.1640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Operative laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over traditional/open laparotomy. However, it is also associated with complications particularly when performed for complex gynaecological procedures. There are very few reports on operative laparoscopic surgery from developing countries. Objective. To evaluate the intraand postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic surgery performed for complex gynaecological conditions by a single surgeon at a tertiary institution. Method. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent complex laparoscopic surgery between 2004 and 2016. Results. We retrieved 446 patient records. Surgery for extensive endometriosis (29.8%) and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (29.8%) were the most common procedures. Less than a tenth of patients (4.3%; n=19) had complications, 9 had minor injuries (4 inferior epigastric vessel injury, 1 peritoneal vessel injury, 1 omental vessel injury, 1 surface tissue bleeding and 2 cases of postoperative ileus) and 10 had major injuries (6 intestinal, 2 ureteric and 3 bladder). More than a quarter of complications (26.3%; n=5) occurred at the time of abdominal entry, 63.2% (n=12) occured intraoperatively and 10.5% (n=2) occurred postoperatively. All entry injuries were vascular. Intestinal injury was the most common intraoperative complication. Conclusion. Despite the many advantages of laparoscopic surgery, complications occur particularly in patients with complex gynaecological pathology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一家三级医疗机构复杂妇科腹腔镜手术并发症的审计
背景腹腔镜手术与传统/开放式剖腹手术相比有许多优点。然而,它也与并发症有关,尤其是在进行复杂的妇科手术时。发展中国家关于腹腔镜手术的报道很少。客观的评估在三级机构由一名外科医生为复杂妇科疾病进行腹腔镜手术的术内和术后并发症。方法这是对2004年至2016年间接受复杂腹腔镜手术的患者的回顾性图表回顾。后果我们检索了446份患者记录。手术治疗广泛性子宫内膜异位症(29.8%)和腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(2.98%)是最常见的手术。不到十分之一的患者(4.3%;n=19)有并发症,9例有轻微损伤(4例上腹部下血管损伤,1例腹膜血管损伤,一例网膜血管损伤,一面组织出血和2例术后回肠),10例有严重损伤(6例肠损伤,2例输尿管损伤和3例膀胱损伤)。超过四分之一的并发症(26.3%;n=5)发生在腹部入路时,63.2%(n=12)发生在手术中,10.5%(n=2)发生在术后。所有入路损伤均为血管性损伤。肠损伤是术中最常见的并发症。结论尽管腹腔镜手术有很多优点,但并发症尤其发生在有复杂妇科病理的患者身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Does adding coenzyme Q10 to dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate positively impact fertility outcomes in young, poor responder infertile women undergoing antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI cycles? Prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety in infertile female patients attending an academic hospital in central South Africa Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1