Recommendation and Acceptance of Counselling for Familial Cancer Risk in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Cases

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Care Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.1159/000517021
K. Kast, Julia Häfner, E. Schröck, A. Jahn, C. Werner, C. Meisel, P. Wimberger
{"title":"Recommendation and Acceptance of Counselling for Familial Cancer Risk in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Cases","authors":"K. Kast, Julia Häfner, E. Schröck, A. Jahn, C. Werner, C. Meisel, P. Wimberger","doi":"10.1159/000517021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In clinical routine, not every patient who is offered genetic counselling and diagnostics in order to investigate a familial cancer risk predisposition opts for it. Little is known about acceptance of counselling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in Germany. Methods: All primary breast cancer cases and patients with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) treated at the University Hospital of Dresden between 2016 and 2019 were included. The number of tumor board recommendations for genetic counselling on the basis of the GC-HBOC risk criteria was recorded. Acceptance was analyzed by number of cases with counselling in the GC-HBOC-Center Dresden. Results: Of 996 primary breast cancer and DCIS cases, 262 (26.3%) were eligible for genetic counselling. Recommendation for genetic counselling was accepted by 64.1% (168/262). Of these 90.5% (152/168) opted for molecular genetic analysis. The acceptance rate for counselling increased between 2016 and 2019 from 58.3 to 72.6%. Altogether, 20.4% (31/152) patients were found to carry a pathogenic variant in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. Conclusion: Acceptance of recommendation is increasing as clinical consequences augment. Optimization in providing information about hereditary cancer risk and in accessibility of counselling and testing is required to further improve acceptance of recommendation.","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"17 1","pages":"153 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000517021","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000517021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In clinical routine, not every patient who is offered genetic counselling and diagnostics in order to investigate a familial cancer risk predisposition opts for it. Little is known about acceptance of counselling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in Germany. Methods: All primary breast cancer cases and patients with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) treated at the University Hospital of Dresden between 2016 and 2019 were included. The number of tumor board recommendations for genetic counselling on the basis of the GC-HBOC risk criteria was recorded. Acceptance was analyzed by number of cases with counselling in the GC-HBOC-Center Dresden. Results: Of 996 primary breast cancer and DCIS cases, 262 (26.3%) were eligible for genetic counselling. Recommendation for genetic counselling was accepted by 64.1% (168/262). Of these 90.5% (152/168) opted for molecular genetic analysis. The acceptance rate for counselling increased between 2016 and 2019 from 58.3 to 72.6%. Altogether, 20.4% (31/152) patients were found to carry a pathogenic variant in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. Conclusion: Acceptance of recommendation is increasing as clinical consequences augment. Optimization in providing information about hereditary cancer risk and in accessibility of counselling and testing is required to further improve acceptance of recommendation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新诊断癌症患者家族性癌症风险咨询的推荐与接受
背景:在临床常规中,并不是每个患者提供遗传咨询和诊断,以调查家族性癌症风险倾向选择它。在德国,人们对新诊断的乳腺癌患者接受咨询和检测的情况知之甚少。方法:纳入2016年至2019年在德累斯顿大学医院治疗的所有原发性乳腺癌病例和DCIS(导管原位癌)患者。记录肿瘤委员会根据GC-HBOC风险标准提出的遗传咨询建议的数量。通过在德累斯顿gc - hboc中心接受咨询的病例数来分析接受情况。结果:996例原发性乳腺癌和DCIS患者中,262例(26.3%)符合遗传咨询要求。接受遗传咨询建议者占64.1%(168/262)。其中90.5%(152/168)选择分子遗传分析。从2016年到2019年,心理咨询的接受率从58.3%上升到72.6%。总共有20.4%(31/152)的患者被发现携带乳腺癌基因BRCA1或BRCA2的致病变异。结论:随着临床结果的增加,推荐的接受度也在增加。为了进一步提高建议的接受度,需要优化提供有关遗传性癌症风险的信息以及提供咨询和检测的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Breast-Conserving Surgery with Immediate Partial Breast Reconstruction by Using Pedicled Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap: A 7-Year Follow-Up of 50 Women. Comparing the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection versus Systemic Steroids in Treating Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience. Exploring the Impact of Sarcopenia on Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnosis, Approach, and Clinical Classification of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Consensus Report. Retrospective Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Breast Cancer Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1