Transformation of the office: territorial behaviour and place attachment in shared desk design

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0043
Luca Frankó, Ajna Erdélyi, A. Dúll
{"title":"Transformation of the office: territorial behaviour and place attachment in shared desk design","authors":"Luca Frankó, Ajna Erdélyi, A. Dúll","doi":"10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present an environmental psychological case study regarding an office design change. The employees of the researched company had the chance to decide whether to stay in the classic open office set-up or to switch to a shared desk supplemented by a one-day-a-week home office possibility. The authors examined the development of participants’ territorial behaviour and place attachment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe given organizational situation is a quasi-experimental design; the variables were examined via questionnaire in a longitudinal model. Quantitative measurement was supplemented with focus group discussions.\n\n\nFindings\nThe degree of personalization (a type of territorial behaviour) decreased significantly not only among those who lost their permanent workstations – as we expected – but also in the entire population. Workplace attachment stagnated for the entire population, but workstation attachment showed a significant decrease among those who switched to the shared desk.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe limitations and the advantages are also followed by the nature of a case study: high ecological validity with relatively low sample size.\n\n\nPractical implications\nRedesigning an office is never just an economic or interior design issue, but a psychological one. This paper provides practical environmental psychological insights into implementing office designs without permanent individual workstations.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper presents the environmental psychological background of shared desk design implementation. The authors point out the significance of repressing personalization behaviour and as per the authors’ knowledge, they are the first to introduce the concept of workstation attachment.\n","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-12-2021-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present an environmental psychological case study regarding an office design change. The employees of the researched company had the chance to decide whether to stay in the classic open office set-up or to switch to a shared desk supplemented by a one-day-a-week home office possibility. The authors examined the development of participants’ territorial behaviour and place attachment. Design/methodology/approach The given organizational situation is a quasi-experimental design; the variables were examined via questionnaire in a longitudinal model. Quantitative measurement was supplemented with focus group discussions. Findings The degree of personalization (a type of territorial behaviour) decreased significantly not only among those who lost their permanent workstations – as we expected – but also in the entire population. Workplace attachment stagnated for the entire population, but workstation attachment showed a significant decrease among those who switched to the shared desk. Research limitations/implications The limitations and the advantages are also followed by the nature of a case study: high ecological validity with relatively low sample size. Practical implications Redesigning an office is never just an economic or interior design issue, but a psychological one. This paper provides practical environmental psychological insights into implementing office designs without permanent individual workstations. Originality/value This paper presents the environmental psychological background of shared desk design implementation. The authors point out the significance of repressing personalization behaviour and as per the authors’ knowledge, they are the first to introduce the concept of workstation attachment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
办公室的转型:共享办公桌设计中的地域行为和位置依恋
目的本文的目的是提供一个关于办公室设计变更的环境心理学案例研究。这家被调查公司的员工有机会决定是留在传统的开放式办公室,还是换成共享办公桌,再加上每周一天的家庭办公。作者研究了参与者的地域行为和地点依恋的发展。设计/方法论/方法给定的组织情境是一种准实验性设计;通过纵向模型中的问卷调查来检验变量。重点小组讨论补充了定量测量。发现个性化程度(一种地域行为)不仅在那些失去永久工作站的人中——正如我们所预期的那样——而且在整个人群中都显著下降。工作场所依恋在整个人群中停滞不前,但在那些改用共享办公桌的人中,工作站依恋显著减少。研究局限性/含义案例研究的性质也有局限性和优势:高生态有效性和相对较低的样本量。实际意义重新设计办公室从来不仅仅是一个经济或室内设计问题,而是一个心理问题。本文为在没有永久性个人工作站的情况下实现办公室设计提供了实用的环境心理学见解。创意/价值本文介绍了共享办公桌设计实施的环境心理背景。作者指出了抑制个性化行为的重要性,并根据作者的知识,他们率先引入了工作站依恋的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis The predictive power of prior attitudes: understanding employee workspace satisfaction in activity-based work environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1